Advanced Search Results
Vinod Pandurang Bharsakade Vs. Returning Officer and anr.
Mumbai
Dec-17-2002
Election
Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1959 - Sections 15 and 15A; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 243O
2003(4)MhLj359
M.V. Mohokar, ;R.V. Gaikwad, ;L.A. Mohta, ;V.R. Choudhari, ;A.M. Ghare and ;N.A. Padhye, Advs.
C. K. Thakker, C.J. 1. A common question of law has been raised inall the petitions. To appreciate the controversy raised in the present group ofpetitions, few relevant facts in the first petition may be noted.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVenkalakshmi Ammal and ors. Vs. Jagannathan (Minor) and ors.
Chennai
Jun-19-1961
Family
Hindu Law; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956
AIR1963Mad316
K.V. Venkatasubramania Ayyar and ;P.S. Srisailam, Advs.
Anantanarayanan, J. 1. The main appeal (A. S. No. 93 of 1957) is by defendants 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 in the Court below in a suit by a minor represented by his next friend...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Union of India (Uoi) Vs. the Official Assignee of Bombay
Mumbai
Dec-10-1970
Constitution
(1971)73BOMLR623; 1971MhLJ884
S.P. Kotval, C.J.1. A rather interesting question arises in this appeal as to the scope and extent of a solicitor's right to his costs and expenses in an administration suit against a rival claim of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
B.D.K. Process Controls Private Ltd. and anr. Vs. Bharatiya Mazdoor Sa ...
Karnataka
Jul-05-2005
Labour and Industrial
Companies Act; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33, 33A, 33(1) and 33(2) ; Payment of Wages Act
[2006(108)FLR306]; ILR2005KAR5110; (2006)IILLJ151Kant
S. Vijaya Shankar, Sr. Adv. and ;C.K. Subramanya, Adv.
P. Vishwanatha Shetty, J.1. In this appeal, the appellants have called in question the correctness of the order dated 29th August 2001 made in W.P.Nos. 25578-79/2000 by the learned Single Judge wherein he has confirmed the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ullasini N. Kamble and ors.
Karnataka
Mar-27-2001
Civil
2001ACJ1797
S.P. Shankar, Adv.
Hari Nath Tilhari, J.1. These appeals arise out of common judgment and award delivered by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal No. 10, Bangalore City, in M.V.C. Case No. 1222 of 1986. The Tribunal by award dated 9.8.88,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSreenivas Lad Vs. Ekanath and ors.
Karnataka
Aug-22-2005
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 40, Rule 1
AIR2005Kant405; 2005(6)KarLJ62
G.S. Visweswara, Sr. Adv. for ;V. Srinivasa Raghavan for ;Indus Law, Advs.
Anand Byrareddy, J.1. This is a plaintiffs appeal against the dismissal of his application tinder Order 40, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'CPC' for brevity).2. The facts are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommittee of Management, Nityanand Ved Mahavidyalaya, Through Its Mana ...
Allahabad
Feb-01-2005
Trusts and SocietiesCivil
Societies Registration Act, 1960 - Sections 4 and 25(2); State Universities Act - Sections 68; Banaras Hindu University Act, 1850 - Sections 5(7)
2005(2)AWC1720; 2005(2)ESC874; (2005)1UPLBEC806
R.S. Maurya, ;P.K. Srivastava and ;Lal Babu Lal, Advs.
Arun Tandon, J.1. These are three writ petitions in respect of the same society and the institutions managed by it.2. Heard Sri R.S. Maurya Advocate on behalf of the Committee of Management with Sri Raghuvansh Pandey...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChand and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-18-1978
Constitution
Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972 - Sections 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18(7), 18(8) and 18(9); ;Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953; Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955
AIR1979P& H19
S.S. Sandhawalia, C.J.1. In this set of five hundred and thirty four connected civil writ petitions ably argued by a galaxy of learned counsel, the focal point that falls for determination is indeed a single one--whether...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNathu Ram Agrawal Vs. Rajasthan Silicate and Glass Industries Private ...
Rajasthan
Jan-29-1988
Company
1988(1)WLN432
Shri. Anant Kasliwal
P.C. Jain, J.1. In this company petition under Sections 433, 334 and 439 of the Companies Act, petitioner Nathu Ram Agarwal has prayed that M/s Rajasthan Silicate and Glass Industries Pvt. Ltd. be wound up and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnanda @ Annasaheb Dnyanu Shinde Vs. Akkatai W/O Bhagwan Patil
Mumbai
Sep-18-1999
FamilyProperty
(2000)102BOMLR36
R.M. Lodha, J.1. This is a dispute between the daughter and adopted son of a Hindu widow Chandrabai in relation to a dwelling-house and the question involved in this appeal is whether the daughter can pray...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »