Advanced Search Results
Kailash Kumar and ors. Vs. R.L. Kapur
Delhi
Apr-21-1994
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)
1994IIAD(Delhi)416; 54(1994)DLT342; 1994(29)DRJ234; 1994RLR387
R.P. Bansal,; S.Poddar and; R.L. Kohli, Advs
P.K. Bahri, J. (1) These two appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated September 30, 1991, of the Rent Control Tribunal by which he had dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants and also...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShiril Babulal Shah Vs. Kusumben Wd/O. Chhaganlal Shah Through Her Leg ...
Gujarat
Aug-28-2002
TenancyCivil
Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13(1) and 29(2)
(2003)1GLR298
Anand Sharma, Adv. for; Sunil C. Patel, Adv.
B.J. Shethna, J.1. Heard learned Counsel Shri Sharma for the petitioner and learned Counsel Shri J. B. Pardiwala, for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3, appearing on Caveat. The respondent Nos. 4/1 to 4/4, legal heirs...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sumitra Devi and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Jul-25-2002
Constitution
II(2002)ACC98,2003ACJ262
Anand Sharma, Adv.
Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. This case came up on 10.7.2002 for consideration of application filed by respondent Nos. 1 to 6, claimants for the release of the amount deposited in this writ and two of them,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Saini and Co. Vs. Union of India
Himachal Pradesh
Sep-08-2000
Direct Taxation
[2001]113TAXMAN55(NULL)
Mohan Jain and N.K. Thakur, for the Assessee K.S. Rathore, M.S. Guleria, Vivek Thakur, Anand Sharma, Indar Singh and Vijay Thakur, for the Revenue
Thakker, C.J. This petition is placed before the Full Bench pursuant to an order dated 8-12-1999, passed by a Division Bench in CMP No. 439 of 1999. The said order reads as under:'Heard learned counsel for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRainbow Ezung Vs. Mhao Lotha and ors.
Guwahati
Jun-05-1984
Election
Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 123
P.K. Goswami, A.K. Bhattacharyya, J.M. Choudhury and S.N. Sarma, Advs.
B.L. Hansaria, J. 1. 4 (Four) candidates were in the fray in this election from No. 38-Wokha Assembly Constituency in the State of Nagaland. The petitioner was a candidate of Congress(I), whereas respondent No. 1 (the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHar NaraIn Vs. Vinod Kumar
Allahabad
Oct-15-1986
ElectionCivil
Constitution of India - Article 141; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 and 151; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 83, 123(2) and 123(4)
AIR1987All319
V. Bhauguna and ;R.N. Pant, Advs.
ORDEROm Prakash, J. 1. The application A-59 has been made by the respondent under Order 6, Rule 16 and Section 151 C.P.C praying that the paragraphs Nos. 10, 13, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuperintending Engineer, Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. and Anoth ...
Himachal Pradesh
Jul-20-2011
Labour and Industrial
Mr. Anand Sharma
V.K. Sharma, J. (Oral). Heard Mr. Anand Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Award dated 20.5.2010 (Annexure P-1), passed by the learned Presiding Judge, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Dharamshala, H.P., in Reference No. 44 of 2007,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnand Sharma Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Delhi
Oct-29-2014
Land Acquisition
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : October 10, 2014 Judgment Delivered on : October 29, 2014 + CRL.A.937/2012 ANAND SHARMA Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.Samrat Nigam, Advocate versus...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMeera vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Delhi
Feb-24-2026
Land Acquisition
Mr. Kshitij Gaur, Mr. Devanand Kumar, Mr. Shahdi Raza, Mr. Sachidanand, Ms. Simran Saba
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 6/2026 MEERA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kshitij Gaur, Mr. Devanand Kumar, Mr. Shahdi Raza, Mr. Sachidanand, Ms. Simran Saba, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNasir Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-20-2013
Education
Shri. Anand Naik
Cr.R.No.2211/2012 20.3.2013 Shri Anand Naik, counsel for the applicants. Shri S.K.Kashyap, Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State. As prayed by learned counsel for the parties, matter is heard finally. The applicants have challenged the order dated 2.11.2012...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »