Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: anand · Page 1 of about 26,804 results (0.685 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 30 2006

Kay Kay Embroideries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cloth Markets and Shops Board and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-30-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 2(3), 2(4), 2(9), 2(11), 2(12), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25F and 170B; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Factories Act, 1948; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; Maharashtra Factories Rules, 1963; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1923; Security Guards Act; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Employees Provident Funds and Family Pension Act, 1952; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abo

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR5; 2006(6)BomCR739; [2007(112)FLR273]; (2007)ILLJ865Bom; 2006(6)MhLj377

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama, ;A.K. Jalisatgi and ;S.K. Talsania, Sr. Counsels, ;Mohit Kapoor, ;Aditya Chitale, ;Anand Grover, ;Bharati Patil, ;Prakash Mahadik, ;S.C. Naidu, ;N.P. Dalvi, ;M.S. Karnik, ;P.K. Rele, ;R.P

J.N. Patel and Roshan Dalvi, JJ.1. The Division Bench of this Court while considering a group of petitions filed by the petitioner employers relating to the application of the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other ., (Writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2009

R.K. Anand Vs. Registrar, Delhi High Court

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-29-2009

Subject : Contempt of CourtCriminal

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 3, 3(3), 12, 13, 14, 17 and 19(1); Evidence Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 164, 311 and 313; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30, 34, 34(1), 38 and 49; Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 - Sections 3 and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 129, 142, 145, 215, 219, 227 and 235; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898

Reported in : JT2009(10)SC1; (2010)5MLJ1377(SC); 2009(10)SCALE164; (2009)8SCC106

Aftab Alam, J.1. The present is a fall out from a criminal trial arising from a hit and run accident on a cold winter morning in Delhi in which a car travelling at reckless speed crashed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 2003

Vishwanatha and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-17-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 318, 329, 330 and 331; India Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 84

Reported in : ILR2004KAR2828

Advocate for Appellant : B. Anand, Amicus Curiae

S.R. Bannurmath, J.1. These two appeals arise from the common judgment dated 27.11.2002 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Uttarakannada, Karwar in S.C. No. 55 of 2002 (original S.C NO. 8 of 1979), finding the accused...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 21 2008

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-21-2008

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1972 - Sections 2; Police and Criminal Evidence Act, 1984 - Sections 78; Representation of the People Act, 1951; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Parliament Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 311; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 304 and 308; Evidence Act - Sections 7 and 8; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 215

Reported in : 2009CriLJ677; 151(2008)DLT695; 2008(105)DRJ557

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind Nigam, Adv. and Amicus Curia; Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv.,;

Madan B. Lokur, J.1. The question for our consideration is whether Mr. R.K. Anand and Mr. I.U. Khan, Senior Advocates and Mr. Sri Bhagwan Sharma, Advocate have committed criminal contempt of Court or not. We have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2000

Shankar Vs. the Assistant Executive Engineer, Grbc, Sub-division 7 and ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-06-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 28(1)

Reported in : 2001ACJ1119; [2000(86)FLR871]; ILR2000KAR2632; 2000(5)KarLJ577

Advocate for Appellant : Sri Anand Kumar for Sri Jagadish Patil, Adv.

B.K. Sangalad1. The appellant is the applicant who has filed the application for the compensation on 21-1-1992 stating that he was working as a Coolie under the respondent 2. On 12-6-1991 when he was working, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2002

Abdul Razak Chand Vs. Mohammed Sayeed and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-28-2002

Subject : Property

Acts : Muslim Law

Reported in : 2002(3)ALD572

Advocate for Appellant : T. Veerabhadrayya and ;T.S. Anand, Adv.

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. In this appeal, the 3rd defendant in OS No.486 of 1983 on the file of the 3rd Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, challenges the judgment and decree therein. The parties are referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 2005

Josyula Jagan Mohandas and ors. Vs. Pyda Venkatesam and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-23-2005

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 7, 7(1), 7(3) and 22; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 27

Reported in : 2006(2)ALT41

Advocate for Appellant : T.S. Anand, Adv.

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. The revision petitioners are the legal representatives of the landlady, Kalava (sic) Das. The landlady filed R.C.C, No. 31 of 1991 on the file of the Principal District Munsiff-cum-Rent Controller, Vizianagaram praying for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 29 2000

Jai Bhagwan and Others Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-29-2000

Subject : Property

Acts : Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 21 and 22; Delhi Development Authority (Disposal of Developed Nazul Land) Rules, 1981 - Rules 2, 4, 6 and 12

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)440

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.K. Anand and; Mr. Arun Birbal, Advs

ORDERDr. M.K. Sharma, J.1. In all these writ petitions issues raised on fact and on law are similar in nature and thereforee, I propose to dispose of all the writ petitions by this common judgment/order. 2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2019

Ms Rupal Anand vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-14-2019

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, Mr. Raghavendra Pratap Singh, Ms. Shumaila Altaf

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12680/2018 & CM Nos. 49294/2018, 53247/2018, 53726/2018 MS RUPAL ANAND ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Kamini Jaiswal, Senior Advocate, Mr Rohit Kumar Singh, Mr...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2004

V.N. Krishna Rao Vs. Turnkey Constructions (P.) Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-17-2004

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 30, 33 and 39(1)

Reported in : I(2006)BC58; [2005]125CompCas109(Kar); 2004(7)KarLJ269; [2004]54SCL278(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : Shwetha Anand, Adv.

Ram Mohan Reddy, J.1. The appellant being aggrieved by the common order dated 28-6-2001 passed in AC No. 48/1995 and 50/1999, on the file of the VI Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore City, CCH-11 ('the Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial