Advanced Search Results

Chhotelal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32

Reported in : 2005(1)MPHT374

Advocate for Appellant : Amod Gupta, Adv.

Dipak Misra, J.1. The appellant, Chhotelal, and Girjabai the accused have been charged under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'the IPC) in Sessions Trial No. 322/93 on the allegation that Chhotelal had...

Dr. Digambar Behera Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: A.K. Behera, Advocate. For the Respondents: R5, Balram Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Sudarshan Rajan, R4, Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Tarun Gupta, R1 to R3, Amit Anand, Advocates.

DR. VEENA CHHOTRAY: 1. The applicant, though considered for the post of Director PGIMER Chandigarh, was not selected. Impugning the selection process on various grounds, the OA seeks by way of relief; Quash and set aside...

Sukhna and anr. Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Amod Gupta, Shri. Alok Vagrecha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.1713/1996 Sukhna & another VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Amod Gupta, counsel for the appellant No.1 duly...

Lakhan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Amod Gupta

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.K.Gupta, J.Criminal Appeal No.06 of 2007 Lakhan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Amod Gupta, counsel for the appellant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel...

Govind, and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 465, 34, 468, 34, 471, 34 ;

Advocate for Appellant : Shri M.A.Khan, Adv.

1. The applicants/accused have preferred this revision under section 397(1) of the Cr.P.C being aggrieved by Order dated 17.2.10 passed by the Vth Add. Sessions Judge (Fast Track) Chhindwara in S.T.No.180/09 framing charges against them for...

Chandu Lal. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Rakesh Jain, Adv.

1. Challenging the order passed by Respondent No.1 as contained in AnnexureP1 and P10 rejecting the claim made by the petitioner with regard to his premature retirement on the basis of a wrong date of birth...

Langra Through Lr\'s: Kalawati Vs. Buddhi Bai Through Lr's: Dhungsu

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Amod Gupta

S.A.No.477/2013 26.6.2013 Shri Amod Gupta, counsel for the appellants. Heard on admission. It would be proper to peruse the records of both the Courts below before considering the question of admission. Office is directed to call...

Bharat Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Criminal Revision No.2051/2012 07.01.2013 Shri Amod Gupta, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Punit Shroti, Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.1-State. None for the respondent No.2. Since the charge sheet was filed by the police in the...

Anil Kumar Pathak Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. S.P.Mishra, Shri. Mishra, Shri. Rajneesh Gupta

1 W.A.No.1286/2011 Anil Kumar Pathak State of M.P.& others 18.9.2012 Shri S.P.Mishra, Counsel for appellant. Shri K.S.Wadhwa, Counsel for respondents No.2 & 3. This appeal is directed against an order dated 20.9.2010 in W.P.No.3262/2009(s) by which...

Smt. Shanti Jaiswal Vs. Indralal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Amod Gupta

Writ Petition No.959/2013 (I) 01.10.2013 Shri Amod Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.decree holdeRs.Shri K.S.Jha, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4- judgment debtor. None for respondent Nos.2 and 3, although served. The petitioneRs.decree holders...