Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: amitabh verma · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.038 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 11 2003

Administrator and anr. Vs. Ramadhar Sharma and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-11-2003

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, 1935

Advocate for Appellant : Amitabh Verma, IAS Administrator and Rakesh Kumar, Adv.

Ravi S. Dhavan, CJ. 1. Bihar State Co-operative Union Limited (BISCOMAUN) is a registered society under the Bihar Co- operative Societies Act, 1935. It is one of the largest society of its kind in east India,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 24 2014

Amitabh Verma Vs. Sneh Lata Malhotra

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-24-2014

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajat Aneja, Ms. Rashmi Verma

$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA2102014 Decided on 24th December, 2014 AMITABH VERMA ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Rajat Aneja and Ms. Rashmi Verma, Advs. versus SNEH LATA MALHOTRA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 24 2014

Amitabh Verma Vs. Sneh Lata Malhotra

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-24-2014

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajat Aneja, Ms. Rashmi Verma

$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA2102014 Decided on 24th December, 2014 AMITABH VERMA ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Rajat Aneja and Ms. Rashmi Verma, Advs. versus SNEH LATA MALHOTRA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 10 2014

Dushyant Kumar Vs. M.C.D. of Delhi and anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-10-2014

Subject : Labour and Industrial

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. h September, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 5512/2011 DUSHYANT KUMAR ..... Petitioner Represented by:Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advs. versus M.C.D....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 1995

Satya Narayan Athya Vs. High Court of M.P. and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-24-1995

Subject : ConstitutionService

Reported in : 1996IAD(SC)387; AIR1996SC750; 1996LabIC757; 1995(7)SCALE138; (1996)1SCC560; [1995]Supp5SCR679

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Mathur and; Amitabh Verma, Advs

ORDERD.P. Mohapatra, J.1. The core question that arises for determination in this appeal is whether Section 9 of the Carriers Act, 1865 (Act 3 of 1865) is applicable to a proceeding under the Consumer Protection Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2007

Braj Kishore Prasad and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Bihar and ors. Etc ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-31-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, 1935 - Sections 14(3); Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 21

Advocate for Appellant : Janardan Pd. Singh, Md. Abu Haidar, Anil Singh, Arbind Kr. Singh, Durganand Jha, Rupak Kumar andRatan Kumar Sinha, Advs.Rajesh Pd. Choudhary, Adv.

V.N. Sinha, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, the State and the Bihar State Co-operative Marketing Union Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'BISCOMAUN').2. The aforesaid two contempt applications have been filed asserting that BISCOMAUN has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2013

Sonali Pramod Dhawde Vs. Central Bank of India and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-01-2013

Subject : Education

Khanwilkar, J. 1. Rule. Respondents waive notice through their respective Counsel. 2. Rule returnable forthwith, by consent. Heard Counsel appearing for the parties, including the interventionists in the companion petition, which has been disposed of today...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2012

M/S Magma Leasing Limited Vs. Bharat Singh

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on : Aug-13-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Prashant Jain

ANUPAM DASGUPTA The respondent in this revision petition was the complainant before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum II, New Delhi (the District Forum, in short) and the petitioner was the opposite party (OP). For convenience,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial