Advanced Search Results

Ram Pukar Singh Vs. Bhimsen and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 12(1) and 23A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 116; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 8, Rule 5; ; Rent Control Law

Reported in : 2006(2)MPHT153; 2006(1)MPLJ381

Advocate for Appellant : Amitabh Gupta, Adv.

Abhay M. Naik, J.1. Appeal is heard on the following substantial question of law :-Whether the Courts below erred in decreeing the suit for eviction under Section 12(1)(f) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, particularly when...

Cit Vs. Ganeshi Lal Ram Krishna

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2006]154TAXMAN238(All)

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Mahajan, for the Revenue Amitabh Agrawal and P.K. Jain, for the Assessee,

ORDERR.K. Agrawal, J. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, has referred the following questions of law under section 256(l) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for opinion to this Court:'Whether,...

Modern Food Industries (India) Limited Vs. I.K. Malik and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 20, Rule 12 - Order 23 Rules 3 and 11; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 53A, 106 and 107; Delhi Rent Control Act; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 2(7) and 49; Amended Delhi Rent Control Act

Reported in : 2002VIIIAD(Delhi)88; 98(2002)DLT593; 2002(63)DRJ451

Advocate for Appellant : Amitabh Narayan, Adv

Usha Mehra, J.CM No. 774/20021. Appellant Modern Food Industries (India) Limited was a tenant in the premises bearing No. C-17, L.S.C.-I Paschimi Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi. The premises consisted of first and Mezzanine floors measuring...

Cit Vs. Vidya Sagar Dewan and Sons

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]147TAXMAN35(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Amitabh Agarwal and P.K. Jain, for the Applicant A.N. Mahajan, for the Respondent.

ORDER1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, has referred the following question of law under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for opinion to this Court:'1. Whether...

Cit Vs. Electra India Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]147TAXMAN595(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Shambhoo Chopra, for the Applicant Amitabh Agrawal & P.K. Jain, for the Respondent.

ORDERBy the Court The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi has referred the following question of law under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for opinion to this Court:'Whether...

Kasturi Lal Dewan and Sons. Vs. Cit

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]147TAXMAN625(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Amitabh Agarwal & P.K. Jain, for the Applicant A.N. Mahajan, for the Respondent.

ORDERBy the CourtThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi has referred following question of law under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for opinion to this Court:'(1) Whether on...

Mahila Jagran Manch, Bangalore Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 19(1) and (2), 21, 32 and 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 292; Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986; Indecent Representation of Women (Amendment) Act, 1986 - Sections 3; National Security Act, 1980

Reported in : 1999(4)KarLJ295

Advocate for Appellant : M/s. Vagdevi Associates, Adv.

R.P. Sethi, C.J.1. 'Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder' is the centuries old saying which is universally acknowledged. Such a belief has been attempted to be belied by few in the later part of...

Babuda Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304, 325 and 447; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 313

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3366

Advocate for Appellant : Amitabh Acharya, Adv.

N.N. Mathur, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 17-3-1998 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Pratapgarh, convicting the appellant of offence under Section 302, I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and to...

Subramani Gopalakrishnan Vs. Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ind ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 409, 420, 468, 471, 477A, 201, 120B; Constitution of India - Article 20(3); Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 - Sections 21(2), 22 read with 21; Chartered Accountants (Procedure of Investigation of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases) Rules, 2007 - Rule 18

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shyam Divan; Mr. R. Sudhinder; Mr. Rahul Ravindran; Ms. Prerna Amitabh, Advs.

1. Keeping in view the similitude pertaining to the legal controversy in both the appeals, despite the fact that there is a slight difference in the factual matrix, these appeals were heard together and are being...

M/S. Hamdard Industries, Uttar Pradesh Versus M/S. Hamdard National Fo ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ajay Amitabh Suman, Monika Vij, Advocates.

(Circuit Bench sitting at Delhi) Honble Shri Justice S. Jagadeesan The petitioner has preferred this appeal against the order of the Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks, New Delhi dated 23.7.2004 wherein the opposition of the first...