Advanced Search Results
Mcd Vs. Maman Chand
Delhi
Jun-02-2006
Service
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 17 and 33C; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226
2006(90)DRJ624
Amita Gupta, Adv
Gita Mittal, J.1. The present writ petition exhibits an unwarranted zeal on the part of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to punish an employee for alleged misdemeanors which are not even provided under its rules. There...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMcd Vs. Hamdard (Wakf) Laboratories India
Delhi
Aug-25-2004
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 164(2)
114(2004)DLT142
Amita Gupta, Adv
D.K. Jain, J.1. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, whereby the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (for short 'the MCD') prays for condensation of delay of 213 days in filing the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Punjab Vs. Surjit Kaur (Dead) Through L.Rs. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-26-2002
Property
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 41
JT2001(10)SC42
Khare, J.1. The erstwhile Pepsu government in lieu of meritorious services rendered by late Jangir Singh, Havaldar in Sikh regiment decided to allot land measuring 89 canals 5 biswas situated in village Magha to Smt. Bachan...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Narinder Singh and Another Vs. State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
Apr-06-2000
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302, and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Evidence Act - Sections 27
AIR2000SC2212; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)861; 2000(1)ALT(Cri)294; 2000CriLJ3462; JT2000(4)SC306; 2000(3)SCALE128; (2000)4SCC603; [2000]2SCR1022
Anil Kumar Gupta,; Rajiv Dutta and; Amita Gupta, Advs
D.P. Wadhwa, J.1. The two appellants were tried for offence under Section 302/34, Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC'). They were acquitted by the Sessions Judge, Jalandhar by judgment dated January 8, 1991. Against their acquittal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHari Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Nov-26-2021
Criminal
AMITA GUPTA __
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.186 of 2018 Hari & Anr. .... Appellants Versus The State of Uttar Pradesh …. Respondent With Criminal Appeal Nos. 190-192 of 2018 Criminal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Rishi Raj JaIn and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-14-2006
Municipal Tax
Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 115, 115(4) and 129; Delhi Land Reforms Act - Sections 9 and 81; Income Tax Act; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 128(1) and 140(1)
AIR2006SC3268; JT2006(12)SC62; 2006(9)SCALE266; 2006(2)LC1217(SC)
Amita Gupta, Adv
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. The Respondent is owner of a farm house. He had constructed a dwelling house therein. The area of the farm house is said to be 2.5 acres. The said land is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Dharma Properties and anr.
Delhi
Mar-04-2005
Municipal Tax
Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 44, 124, 124(2)(3), 126, 126(1), 126(2), 126(4), 169, 444 and 444(1); General Clauses Act - Sections 27; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138
120(2005)DLT588
Amita Gupta and; Geeta Mehrotra, Advs
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. The present appeal under letters patent is directed against the judgment and order of a learned Single Judge dated 21st February, 2002, rejecting the writ petition preferred by the appellant (hereafter called...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.C.D. Vs. Brij Bala and anr.
Delhi
Sep-09-2003
Labour and Industrial
Recruitment Rules
2004IAD(Delhi)331; 108(2003)DLT696
Amita Gupta, Adv
Mukul Mudgal, J.1. Rule. 2. With the consent of both the counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up today for final hearing.3. This writ petition challenges the impugned Award dated 1st July, 1999,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Abid Raza Zaidi and anr.
Delhi
Sep-26-2003
Labour and Industrial
Labour Law
2004(74)DRJ218; 2004(2)SLJ369(Delhi)
Amita Gupta, Adv
Mukul Mudgal, J.1. Rule.2. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up today for final hearing.3. This writ petition challenges the Award dated 15th October, 1999 by Labour Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Corporation of Delhi Through Its Commissioner Vs. Smt. Rupa ...
Delhi
Apr-26-2007
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(I)(C), 12(5) and 25F; Minimum Wages Act
140(2007)DLT506; [2007(114)FLR119]
Amita Gupta, Adv
Kailash Gambhir, J.1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the ex-parte award dated 1.3.96 passed by the Labour Court in I.D. No. 95/90. Pursuant to the reference made by the Secretary (Labour)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »