Advanced Search Results

Chinta Devi and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161 and 482; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 25, 42, 50 and 161; ;Evidence Act

Reported in : (1997)1CALLT367(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Amit Talukdar, ;Ashutosh Pal, ;Fazle Rabi and ;T. Ghosh, Advs.

Dibyendu Bhushan Dutta, J. 1. A proceeding being C case No. 7 of 1996 arising out of G.R. Case No. 228 of 1996 pending in the court of learned Judge, Special Court, (under the Narcotic Drugs...

Sona Ghosh (In Jail) and Three ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 323 and 324;; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 161

Reported in : (1998)3CALLT450(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Dilip Dutta, ;Mrs. Amit Talukdar and ;Ms. Joysree Chakraborty, Advs.

K.J. Sengupta, J. 1. In this appeal the appellants/accused have challenged the judgment and sentence of a convinction passed by the learned Additional , Session Judge, 3rd Court, Krishnanagar, Nadia in Sessions Trial No. V of...

Abdul Nawaz Vs. State of West Bengal.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302, 392, 411, 201, 120B, 341, 109, 300, 304(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 161

T.S. THAKUR, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by special leave arises out of a judgment and order dated 30th August, 2010 passed by the High Court of Calcutta whereby Criminal Appeal No.5 of 2010 filed by...

Sankar Prosad Ghosh Vs. Lakshmi Rani Ghosh

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 125

Reported in : II(1998)DMC53,I(1999)DMC624

Advocate for Appellant : Amit Talukdar and ;Kallol Mondal, Advs.

Bhagabati Prosad Banerjee, J.1. In view of two conflicting decisions of two learned Single Judges of this Court regarding the date from which order for maintenance could be passed by the learned Magistrate under Section 125...

Vivek Kathotia Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 9, 81, 156, 156(3), 392, 437, 438, 438(1A), 439, 439(2) and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 406, 420, 467, 468, 469 and 471

Reported in : 2009(1)CHN119

Advocate for Appellant : Sekhar Basu, ;Kallol Mondal, ;Koushik Chatterjee and ;Moumita Chattarjee, Advs.

INTRODUCTION1. What was felt to be just desert by the opposite party Nos. 2, 3 and 4 was not found to be just justice for the petitioner. This antithesis has paved the way for filing of...

Jyoti Bhusan Bose and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226;; West Bengal Town & Country (Planning & Development) Act, 1979 - Sections 2(7, 12 and 13), 46, 46(2, 3 and 4) and 134;; West Bengal Fisheries (Acquisition and Requisition) Act, 1965;; Land Reforms Act, 1955;; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986;; Planning Act, 1997 - Section 46(3)

Reported in : (2000)2CALLT243(HC),2000(1)CHN768

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sardar Amjad Ali and ;Mr. Mrityunjoy Das Majumdar, Advs.;Anindya Mitra, ;Mr. Alak Kumar Ghosh and ;Mr. Achintya Kumar Banerjee, Advs.;MR. Uma Prasad Mukherjee and ;Mr. Janardan Modal, Adv.

R.K. Mitra, J. 1. This applicant had been made by the petitioners in an endeavour to restrain the Calcutta Municipal Corporation from fllling-up of a 'pond and/or swamp' commonly known as 'Rani Kuthlr Pukur' situate in...

Saroj Tikader Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 104B, 304B, 307, 369, 498A, 511 and 561A;; West Bengal Act, 1988 - Section 167(5);; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125, 155(3), 192(2), 200, 202, 203, 208, 209, 227, 251, 262, 362, 397, 401 and 482;; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 26

Reported in : (1998)2CALLT314(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.S. Ray, Adv.

D.B. Dutta, J.1. Saroj Tikader, one of the accused persons (accused No. 1) of C.R. Case No. 208 of 1995 pending in the Court of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Islampore has preferred the present revisional application...

Raghubirsaran JaIn and anr. Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Section 11; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161, 170, 173, 173(2), 173(5), 173(7), 190, 190(1), 193 and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 47, 420 and 468; ;Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : 1995CriLJ4117

Advocate for Appellant : Dilip Dutta, ;Jayshree Chowdhury, ;S. Ganguly and ;R.L. Mitra, Advs.

ORDERA.K. Dutta, J.1. By this Revisional Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as Code) the two accused petitioners Raghubir Saran Jain and Ashok Kr. Jain (hereinafter referred to as...

Saroj Mondal and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Section 63; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 323, 363, 365 and 366; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 157(1), 161, 164, 313 and 464

Advocate for Appellant : Shibadas Banerjee, ;Y. Dastoor, ;P. Majumdar, ;Sudipto Maitra, ;S.G. Mukherjee and ;Debobrata Mondal, Advs.

Dipankar Datta, J.1. The six appellants [Saroj, Abhimanya, Abani, Sagar, Shyam @ Shyamal and Dinesh (hereafter A-1, A-2, A-3, A-4, A-5 and A-6 respectively)] were arraigned in Sessions Trial No. VII (March) of 2001 before the...

Abdul Rehman Jumakhan Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3

Reported in : 1988(2)Crimes537; 35(1988)DLT140

Advocate for Appellant : Harjinder Singh,; Rohit Kochhar,; S.K. Mishra,;

G.C. Jain, J. (1) This judgment shall also dispose Criminal Writ Petition No. 530/87 (Sh. Sattar Usman Wadiwala v. Union of India & Ors.) as both these petitions raise common questions of fact and law. On...