Advanced Search Results

Prayag NaraIn and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16, 39 and 226

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC1755; (1998)3UPLBEC2125

Advocate for Appellant : Amit Saxena and ;P.N. Saxena, Advs.

O.P. Garg, J.1. All the petitioners in these five writ petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, are employed as class IV employee in thePublic Works Department in district Fatehpur. They are working on...

Committee of Management, V.K. Higher Secondary School and anr. Vs. Sta ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Salaries Act, 1971; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921

Reported in : (2004)3UPLBEC2892

Advocate for Appellant : Amit Saxena, Adv.

Vineet Saran, J.1. Both these writ petitioners are based on same facts and raise similar questions and hence they have been heard together and, with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, they are...

Shri Kishore and anr. Vs. Roop Kishore

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 103; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27 and 27(1)

Reported in : AIR2006All103; 2006(2)AWC1486

Advocate for Appellant : Amit Saxena, Adv.

ORDERVineet Saran, J.1. Petitioners Shri Kishore and Bacchan Babu as well as respondent Roop Kishore are all real brothers having their landed properties situated in the village. After the death of their father, they inherited the...

Committee of Management, Janta Inter College and ors. Vs. State of U.P ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ConstitutionElection

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 16(A), 16A(7)

Reported in : (2005)1UPLBEC671

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Saxena and ;Amit Saxena, Advs.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri P. N. Saxena, assisted by Sri Amit Saxena on behalf of the petitioner, Learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3, Sri Irshad Ali on behalf of...

Maharaji Educational Trust No. 1 Through Its Secretary and ors. Vs. Pu ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : BankingTrusts and Societies

Acts : Recovery of Dues due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19 and 21

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2851

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Singh, ; C.B. Yadav and ;Amit Saxena, Advs.

Vineet Saran, J.1. The petitioner-Trust had taken a loan from the respondent-Punjab & Sind Bank, which could not be repaid within time. Initially negotiations for one time settlement were going on between the petitioners and the...

Bhagwan Deen Verma, Son of Sri Mullu Vs. State of U.P. Through Princip ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Panchayat Raj Act - Sections 19(1), 95(1) and 95(1)(3); Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhan, Up-Pradhan and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997; Constitution of India - Article 226; Panchayat Raj Rules, 1946 - Rule 256; Panchayat Raj Regulations

Reported in : 2005(4)AWC3281; 2005(3)ESC2106

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Saxena and ;Amit Saxena, Advs.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard P.N. Saxena Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Amit Saxena Advocate on behalf of the petitioner, Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Sri A.N. Verma Advocate on behalf...

Nutan Kumar and ors. Vs. Iind Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2459

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Saxena, ;Amit Saxena, ;S.K. Shukla and ;R.K. Pandey, Advs.

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. The petitioners are the landlord and had filed a suit for arrears of rent and for the ejectment of respondent No. 3, who was a tenant in the premises in dispute. The Judge...

Shiv Nathi Vs. Raj Deo and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 23, Rule 3A and 3; Indian Contract Act, 1872

Reported in : 2001(4)AWC2863

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Saxena and ;Amit Saxena, Advs.

S.K. Singh, J.1. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought relief of quashing the judgment and order dated 27.10.1988 (Annexure-7 to the writ petition) passed by the District Judge, Allahabad.2. The respondent No....

Court on Its Own Motion vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Maninder Acharya, Mr. K.M.Nataraj, Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, Mr. Anmol Chandan, Mr. Abhigyan Siddhant, Mr. Tushar Sannu, Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Mr. Manan Kumar Misra, Mr. S. Prabhakaran, Mr. Ram Shankar, Mr. K.C. Mittal, Ms. Suman Rani

$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11652/2019 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION Through: Court on its own motion ........ Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS...

Court on Its Own Motion vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Prabhakaran, Mr. Manan, Mr. Ram Shankar, Ms. Maninder Acharya, Mr. Rakesh K. Khanna, Ms. Preeti Singh, Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Mr. Mohit Mathur, Mr. Abhijat, Mr. Amit Saxena, Mr. Mahavir Sharma, Mr. Dhir Singh Kasana, Mr. C.M. Patel

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.11652/2019 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION Versus Through: Court on its own motion. ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Kumar...