Advanced Search Results

Ashok Gyanchand Vohra Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 1 to 4, 5, 5(1), 6, 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 9(2), 9(3), 9(4), 10, 11, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 23(1), 23(2), 24, 25, 29, 50 and 58(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 2(2), 3, 4, 4(2), 6, 9, 24, 25, 26, 36, 39, 154 to 176, 190, 190(1), 193, 195, 197, 197(1), 200 to 203, 204, 340 and 438; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 143, 147, 149, 166, 182, 191, 192, 193, 195, 196, 218 and 323; Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 29, 29(1) and 50; Terrorists and Dangerous Activities Act; Maharashtra Control of Organized Crimes Act, 1990; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 14(1), 20A(1) and 20A(2); narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Prevention of

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1270; 2006(3)MhLj163

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Agarwal, ;A.M. Sarogi and ;Girish Agarwal, Advs., ;Asmita Sarangdhar, Adv. in Cri. Application No. 3172 of 2004, ;Sushilkumar, Sr. Counsel, ;S.K. Jain, ;Rajendra Shirodkar, ;H. Jain, ;Lalit Chava

V.G. Palshikar, Acg. C.J.1. The above writ petitions were heard by us and the judgment was reserved. Then I prepared the judgment of the Bench in November, 2005 and circulated it to my learned colleagues on...

Bharat Parikh Vs. C.B.i. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 207, 227, 238 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 468, 471 and 477A; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3540; 2008(10)SCALE86; (2008)10SCC109; 2008AIRSCW4842

Advocate for Appellant : Amit Desai, Sr. Adv.,; Bhargava V. Desai,; Rahul Gupta,;

Altamas Kabir, J.1. Leave granted.2. Two legal propositions fall for consideration in this appeal. The first proposition deals with the question as to whether having framed charges against an accused, a Magistrate has the jurisdiction in...

Harshad S. Mehta Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B and 409; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ,1973 - Sections 164, 190, 306, 307 and 308; Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 6 and 9(2); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1 and 2) and 5; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 118 and 133; Constitution of India - Article 14; Cope of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1898 - Sections 337; Criminal Law Amendments Act, 1952 - Sections 8(1); Special Court Act, 1979

Reported in : 1998(5)BomCR783; (1998)2BOMLR114

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. Sushma S. Singh, ;Mohan Pungalia,; Harish Gulati, ;Dinesh Parekh, ;V.G. Pradhan and ;R.S. Mhamane, Advs., ;M.R. Jethmalani and ;A.D. Chougule, Advs., i/by Chougule & Co., Amit Desai and ;Vija

ORDERM.S.Rane, J.1. These applications have been presented by and on behalf of accused Nos. 1, 2 and 5. Reliefs claimed in both these applications and the grounds upon which same are claimed being indentical, the same...

Sai Accumulator Industries Sangamner, Through its Partner, Kacheshvar ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Service Tax

1. This is an Appeal against acquittal of Respondent original accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ("Act" in brief). 2. Facts in brief may be stated as follows: (A). The Appellant original...

Car Mart Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Apollo Finvest India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141

Reported in : 2001(5)BomCR261; 2000ALLMR(Cri)1476

Advocate for Appellant : Amit Desai and ;Prakash Naik, Advs.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Heard Mr. Amit Desai with Mr. Prakash Naik for the petitioner. Mr. A.K. Saxena for respondent No. 1 and the learned A.P.P. for respondent No. 2.2. Through this application preferred under section 482...

Kartongen Kemi Och Forvaltning Ab and ors. Vs. State Through Cbi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 227 and 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 161, 420 and 465; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63 and 78(6)

Reported in : 2004(72)DRJ693

Advocate for Appellant : Alok Sen Gupta, Sr. Adv.,; Rajan Narain,; Sajan Narain,

J.D. Kapoor, J.1. The petitioners, M/s A.B. Bofors, S.P. Hinduja, G.P. Hinduja and P.P. Hinduja, have through these petitions challenged the impugned order dated 14.11.2002 passed by the learned Special Judge whereby he has charged them...

Sunil Bharti Mittal Vs. Cbi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : ( 2015) 4 SCC 609; [2015] 1 SCR 377; 2015 INSC 18

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.34 OF2015(arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.2961 of 2013) |SUNIL BHARTI MITTAL |.....APPELLANT(S) | |VERSUS | | |CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION |.....RESPONDENT(S)...

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : FOX MANDAL & CO. __

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.4634 OF2014VIJAY MADANLAL CHOUDHARY & ORS. ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.28394 OF2011SPECIAL...

Shailesh Ramanlal Mahimtura Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with the consent of the parties and taken up for final disposal. 2. By this application, the applicant has impugned the order dated 17th January, 2014 passed by the learned...

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Jagan Gagansingh Nepali.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Section 2(e), 2(d), 2(f), 3, 23, 11; Partnership Act - Section 69(3),; Food Products Order (1955) - clause 2(d) (v); Displaced Persons (Verification of Claims) Supplementary Rules, 1954 - Rule 18, Clause (4); Constitution of India - Article 19, 14, 43(1), 42(1),; Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Act, 1998 - Section 2(35); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 28, 146, 153A, 400, 401, 413, 506; Companies Act - Section 630(1), 56(1); Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act 1987 - Section 15, 12, 5, 3(e),

JUDGMENT : (Per B.R.Gavai, J.) 1. Since the Division Bench of this Court vide its order dated 26th April 2011 passed in Criminal Appeal No.20/2011 has disagreed with the view taken earlier by two Division Benches...