Advanced Search Results

Galaxy Indo Fab Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F

Reported in : 2006(193)ELT413(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Pankaj Bhatia and ;Amit Awasthi, Advs.

Rajes Kumar, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order of Tribunal dated 17-8-2005 passed on the application under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') the Act, by which...

Commissioner of Customs (Export) vs. Kothari Foods & Fragrance Pvt ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Amit Bansal

$~ 10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :26. 11.2018 + CUSAA1472018 & CM APPL. 23960/2018 COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (EXPORT) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Bansal, Senior KOTHARI FOODS & FRAGRANCE...

Somani Iron and Steels Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1998)(100)ELT393TriDel

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Amit Awasthi

1. Appeal is directed against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Allahabad upholding the order-in-original passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Division II, Kanpur. By his said order-in-original, the Assistant Commissioner...

Pasupati Alloys Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1999)(114)ELT735TriDel

1. This is an appeal on determination of annual capacity of induction furnace. The appellants opted for payment of duty under Sub-rule (3) of Rule 96ZO. The adjudicating authority determined the capacity of the furnace higher...

Pravesh Castings P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1999)(112)ELT67TriDel

1. Shri Amit Awasthi, learned Counsel arguing the application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty submits that the applicants had submitted an application for re-determination of the capacity of the two furnaces installed in their factory....

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Venus Auto (P) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2000)(118)ELT347TriDel

1. When the case was called Shri Amit Awasthi, learned Advocate appeared on behalf of the Respondents.2. Learned JDR appearing on behalf of the applicant Revenue submits that in this case the Final Order was passed...

V.V.S. Concast Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2000)(120)ELT436TriDel

1. Ld. Commissioner in the impugned order held: "I disallow the abatement claims for the period 26-5-1998 to 30-6-1998 and 30-10-1998 to 2-12-1998 filed by M/s. V.V.S. Concast Ltd. for non-compliance of the provisions of Rule...

Pushpa Industrial Corporation Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2001)(127)ELT429TriDel

1. Shri Amit Awasthi, learned Counsel arguing the application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty, submits that the applicants had applied for re-determination of the capacity of their re-rolling mill after opting for payment of duty...

Om Shiv Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(160)ELT202Tri(Chennai)

1. Both these appeals arise from a common Order-in-Original No. 51/2001 dt. 20-2-2001 passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Chennai. The appellants had imported one photo-composing machine vide Bill of Entry dated 24-12-92 declaring the item...

Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex. Vs. Somani Iron and Steels Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(184)ELT201TriDel

1. Perused the records and heard both sides. The Revenue's appeal is directed against the rejection of their appeal by Order-in-Appeal No.49-CE/Appl/Knp/2004, dated 13-2-2004. That Order-in-Appeal was passed against the corrigendum dated 26-10-2001 to the Order-in-Original...