Advanced Search Results

Shambhu Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Ved Prakash

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138, 141 and 142; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : 151(2008)DLT333; 2008(105)DRJ538

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Goswami, Adv

Vipin Sanghi, J.1. These four petitions under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order since they raise identical issues and the respondent in all the petitions...

Narinder Chugh vs Union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

$~J * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on: 02.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 6612/2025 SH. MUKUL MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Mr. Bhuvnesh Satija, Mr. Udit Sharma and Mr. Aniket Khanduri,...

Hardeep Singh vs Union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment pronounced on: 02.02.2026+ W.P.(C) 6612/2025SH. MUKUL MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Mr. Bhuvnesh Satija, Mr. Udit Sharma and Mr. Aniket Khanduri, Advocates.versusSR. SUPERINTENDENT POLICY REGIONAL...

Amit Aggarwal vs Union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment pronounced on: 02.02.2026+ W.P.(C) 6612/2025 SH. MUKUL MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Mr. Bhuvnesh Satija, Mr. Udit Sharma and Mr. Aniket Khanduri, Advocates.versusSR. SUPERINTENDENT POLICY...

Sh. Mukul Mittal vs Sr. Superintendent Policy Regional Passport Office

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment pronounced on: 02.02.2026+ W.P.(C) 6612/2025 SH. MUKUL MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Mr. Bhuvnesh Satija, Mr. Udit Sharma and Mr. Aniket Khanduri, Advocates.versusSR. SUPERINTENDENT POLICY...

Shri Bhagwan Das Smriti Trust vs Millenium Education Management Pvt. L ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Nitesh Jain, Mr. Nishant Bhargava, Ms. Apurva, Mr. Achint Singh Gyani, Ms. Bhawna Gandhi, Mr. Amit Aggarwal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 25.02.2026+ O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 78/2026 & I.A. 5183/2026 (For Exemption)SHRI BHAGWAN DAS SMRITI TRUST .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitesh Jain, Mr. Nishant Bhargava & Ms. Apurva,...

Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Vs. Vishwa Jagriti Mission

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Mr. Karan Chauhan, Mr. N. K. Poddar, Mr. Rajender Singhvi, Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Mr. Anurag Dubey

* % + + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h September, 2012 Date of Decision:21. t December, 2012 ITA 773/2010 ITA 775/2010 ITA 1092/2010...

Rajiv Bhatnagar vs.ish Bhatnagar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Ms. Vidhi Goel, Mr. Vinod Kapoor

$~44 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"12th March, 2018 C.R.P. 38/2018 and CM APPL.9405-9406/2018 RAJIV BHATNAGAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Adv. with Ms. Vidhi Goel, Adv. &...

Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Vs. Vishwa Jagriti Mission

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Mr. Karan Chauhan, Mr. N. K. Poddar, Mr. Rajender Singhvi, Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Mr. Anurag Dubey

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h September, 2012 Date of Decision:21. t December, 2012 % + + + + + + + + + ITA 754/2010 & C.M. APPL....

Yum! Restaurants India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 44AB, 92, 139, 142, 142(2A), 142(2B), 142(2C), 143 and 288(2); Customs Act - Sections 110(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2005)196CTR(Del)435; 122(2005)DLT370; 2005(83)DRJ102; [2005]278ITR401(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Syali, Sr. Adv.,; Satyen Sethi and; Manu K. Giri,

Swatanter Kumar, J.1. Whether the Maxim Audi Alteram Partem, if at all and to what extent is applicable to the proceedings before the Assessing officer while passing a direction as contemplated under Section 142(2A) of the...