Advanced Search Results

Shambhu Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Ved Prakash

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138, 141 and 142; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : 151(2008)DLT333; 2008(105)DRJ538

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Goswami, Adv

Vipin Sanghi, J.1. These four petitions under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order since they raise identical issues and the respondent in all the petitions...

Narinder Chugh vs Union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

$~J * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on: 02.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 6612/2025 SH. MUKUL MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Mr. Bhuvnesh Satija, Mr. Udit Sharma and Mr. Aniket Khanduri,...

Hardeep Singh vs Union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment pronounced on: 02.02.2026+ W.P.(C) 6612/2025SH. MUKUL MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Mr. Bhuvnesh Satija, Mr. Udit Sharma and Mr. Aniket Khanduri, Advocates.versusSR. SUPERINTENDENT POLICY REGIONAL...

Amit Aggarwal vs Union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment pronounced on: 02.02.2026+ W.P.(C) 6612/2025 SH. MUKUL MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Mr. Bhuvnesh Satija, Mr. Udit Sharma and Mr. Aniket Khanduri, Advocates.versusSR. SUPERINTENDENT POLICY...

Sh. Mukul Mittal vs Sr. Superintendent Policy Regional Passport Office

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment pronounced on: 02.02.2026+ W.P.(C) 6612/2025 SH. MUKUL MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Mr. Bhuvnesh Satija, Mr. Udit Sharma and Mr. Aniket Khanduri, Advocates.versusSR. SUPERINTENDENT POLICY...

Yum! Restaurants India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 44AB, 92, 139, 142, 142(2A), 142(2B), 142(2C), 143 and 288(2); Customs Act - Sections 110(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2005)196CTR(Del)435; 122(2005)DLT370; 2005(83)DRJ102; [2005]278ITR401(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Syali, Sr. Adv.,; Satyen Sethi and; Manu K. Giri,

Swatanter Kumar, J.1. Whether the Maxim Audi Alteram Partem, if at all and to what extent is applicable to the proceedings before the Assessing officer while passing a direction as contemplated under Section 142(2A) of the...

Dr. Kuldeep Verma and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 420, 474 and 511

Reported in : 99(2002)DLT25

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Lekhi, Sr. Adv. and; Anurag Dubey, Adv.,; Salman Khurs

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Petitioners numbering 23, who are Doctors, holding MBBS Degrees and are the applicants for admission to MD/MS and MDS courses, had taken All India Post Graduate Medical Entrance Examination-2002, for short (AIPGMEE-2002), conducted...

Present: Mr. Anand Chhibber Senior Advocate with Vs. Unknown

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

203 CR-2676-1993 (O&M) JIT SINGH VS SUKHDEV SINGH Present: Mr.Dhirinder Chopra, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Mr.A.S.Narang, Advocate for the respondent. Learned counsel submit that efforts to settle the issue amicably have failed. They wish to address on...

Manjit Kaur and anr. Vs. Shri Narinder Bhargav

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. COCP No.2867 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision:30. 11.2012 Manjit Kaur & anr. -----Petitioner(s) versus Shri Narinder Bhargav -----Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1...

Present: Mr.Amit Aggarwal Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

CWP No.395 o”1. IN THE PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH ..CWP No.395 of 2013 Date of decision :02. 05.2013 Jagman Inderjit Singh ..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIVE...