Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ambrish kumar · Page 1 of about 151 results (0.106 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 27 1998

Ramesh Chand JaIn Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-27-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Reported in : 77(1999)DLT460; 1999(48)DRJ578

Advocate for Appellant : Ambrish Kumar, Adv

Vijender Jain, J. 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition for issuance of appropriate writ to quash the order dated 16.4.1991 and the order dated 5.9.1991. Petitioner, who was working as Junior Engineer with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 2012

Ashok Kumar. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-13-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 146(1), 145, 145(1); Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39 Rule 1, Order 39 Rule 2, Section 151

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Leave granted.2. We are, in this case, concerned with the validity of an Order of attachment passed under Section 146(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure by Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM), Haridwar on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 1981

Indian Bank Vs. R.K. Bawaja, Etc.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-17-1981

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10

Reported in : ILR1981Delhi124

Advocate for Appellant : Ambrish Kumar and; N.C. Sikri, Advs

S.S. Chadha, J. (1) This order will dispose of Civil Writs 851/70 and 1120/70 filed by the Indian Bank and Shri Chidambaram respectively under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India against the award...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 23 2006

Chairman-cum-m.D., T.N.C.S. Corpn. Ltd. and ors. Vs. K. Meerabai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-23-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 409 and 477A; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2006SC3522; (SCSuppl)2006(2)CHN124; 2006(1)CTC348; [2006(108)FLR940]; (2006)ILLJ826SC; (2006)1MLJ166(SC); 2006(1)SCALE546; (2006)2SCC255; 2006(2)SLJ158(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Ambrish Kumar, Adv

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1.The present appeal was preferred against the final judgment and order dated 19.04.2004 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras passed in Writ Appeal No. 2592 of 2001 dismissing the same. Factual...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 1996

N. Rajarathinam Vs. State of T.N. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-06-1996

Subject : Service

Acts : Evidence Act

Reported in : 1996VIIAD(SC)327; [1996(74)FLR2394]; JT1996(8)SC447; (1997)ILLJ224SC; 1996(7)SCALE21; (1996)10SCC371; [1996]Supp5SCR593; 1997(1)SLJ10(SC); (1997)1UPLBEC152

Advocate for Appellant : Ambrish Kumar, Adv

ORDER1. Delay condoned.2. This special leave petition has been filed against an order of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, made on February 26, 1996 in OA No. 2152 of 1991. The petitioner, while working...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 1987

Mela Singh Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-10-1987

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4

Reported in : 1987(12)DRJ265

Advocate for Appellant : Ambrish Kumar,; R.K. Anand and; S.P. Sharma, Advs

B.N. Kirpal, J. (1) The challenge in this writ petition under Article- 226 of the Constitution is to the cancellation of an allotment of plot of land which had been made in favor of the petitioner....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 2007

M/S. Epilson Publishing House Pvt. Limited, Uttar Pradesh Vs. M/S. Gra ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on : Jul-09-2007

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Ambrish Kumar.

(Circuit Bench at New Delhi) Honble Shri Z. S. Negi, Vice-Chairman: The applicant company has through its managing director Smt. S. Bhasin filed the rectification application under sections 47, 57 and 125 of the Trade Marks...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 1992

Mahendra Pratap Singh (Deceased) and Another Vs. Smt. Padam Kumari Dev ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-22-1992

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 183; Power of Attorney Act, 1882 - Sections 2; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 77 - Order 3, Rule 1 - Order X, Rules 2 and 4 - Order 26, Rules 7, 13 and 20 - Order 32, Rules 1 to 14, 15, 16 and 21 - Order 32A, Rules 1, 2 and 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 109 and 165

Reported in : AIR1993All143

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Sharma, ;P.M. Gupta and ;K.S. Chauhan, Advs.

1. A very ugly situation faces the Court, the High Court, in its original jurisdiction in these cases. Many questions have been flung at the Court. The Court must answer them as they are all questions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 1998

Indian Bank Vs. K. Usha and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-28-1998

Subject : Labour and IndustrialService

Acts : Banking Regulation Act, 1949 -- Sections 2 and 45; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 -- Sections 2 and 18 (1); Specific Relief Act, 1963 -- Sections 2 and 19; Constitution of India -- Article 136; Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : 1998IAD(SC)498; AIR1998SC866; JT1998(1)SC265; 1998(1)SCALE226; (1998)2SCC663; [1998]1SCR358

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ambrish Kumar

ORDERJudgement pronounced by S.B. Majmudar, J.1. Leave granted in Special Leave Petitions.2. By consent of learned advocates appearing for contesting parties this group of nine appeals was heard finally and is being disposed of by this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 1996

A. Mahudeswaran and ors. Vs. Govt. of T.N. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-12-1996

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 10 and 23

Reported in : 1996IVAD(SC)63; [1996(73)FLR1669]; JT1996(5)SC506; 1996(3)SCALE289; (1996)8SCC617; [1996]3SCR312

Advocate for Appellant : S. Sivasubramanium,; R. Mohan,; V.G. Pragasam and;

ORDER1. Delay condoned2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.3. Leave granted.4. The facts are not in dispute. Consequent upon the abolition of the post of the Village Officer in the year 1982, around 2000...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial