Advanced Search Results
Ramesh Chand JaIn Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.
Delhi
Oct-27-1998
Service
Service Law
77(1999)DLT460; 1999(48)DRJ578
Ambrish Kumar, Adv
Vijender Jain, J. 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition for issuance of appropriate writ to quash the order dated 16.4.1991 and the order dated 5.9.1991. Petitioner, who was working as Junior Engineer with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Kumar. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Dec-13-2012
Land Acquisition
Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 146(1), 145, 145(1); Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39 Rule 1, Order 39 Rule 2, Section 151
K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Leave granted.2. We are, in this case, concerned with the validity of an Order of attachment passed under Section 146(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure by Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM), Haridwar on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Bank Vs. R.K. Bawaja, Etc.
Delhi
Mar-17-1981
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10
ILR1981Delhi124
Ambrish Kumar and; N.C. Sikri, Advs
S.S. Chadha, J. (1) This order will dispose of Civil Writs 851/70 and 1120/70 filed by the Indian Bank and Shri Chidambaram respectively under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India against the award...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Chairman-cum-m.D., T.N.C.S. Corpn. Ltd. and ors. Vs. K. Meerabai
Supreme Court of India
Jan-23-2006
Service
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 409 and 477A; ;Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR2006SC3522; (SCSuppl)2006(2)CHN124; 2006(1)CTC348; [2006(108)FLR940]; (2006)ILLJ826SC; (2006)1MLJ166(SC); 2006(1)SCALE546; (2006)2SCC255; 2006(2)SLJ158(SC)
Ambrish Kumar, Adv
AR. Lakshmanan, J.1.The present appeal was preferred against the final judgment and order dated 19.04.2004 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras passed in Writ Appeal No. 2592 of 2001 dismissing the same. Factual...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Rajarathinam Vs. State of T.N. and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-06-1996
Service
Evidence Act
1996VIIAD(SC)327; [1996(74)FLR2394]; JT1996(8)SC447; (1997)ILLJ224SC; 1996(7)SCALE21; (1996)10SCC371; [1996]Supp5SCR593; 1997(1)SLJ10(SC); (1997)1UPLBEC152
Ambrish Kumar, Adv
ORDER1. Delay condoned.2. This special leave petition has been filed against an order of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, made on February 26, 1996 in OA No. 2152 of 1991. The petitioner, while working...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMela Singh Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.
Delhi
Feb-10-1987
Property
Constitution of India - Article 226; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4
1987(12)DRJ265
Ambrish Kumar,; R.K. Anand and; S.P. Sharma, Advs
B.N. Kirpal, J. (1) The challenge in this writ petition under Article- 226 of the Constitution is to the cancellation of an allotment of plot of land which had been made in favor of the petitioner....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Epilson Publishing House Pvt. Limited, Uttar Pradesh Vs. M/S. Gra ...
Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Jul-09-2007
MRTP
Ambrish Kumar.
(Circuit Bench at New Delhi) Honble Shri Z. S. Negi, Vice-Chairman: The applicant company has through its managing director Smt. S. Bhasin filed the rectification application under sections 47, 57 and 125 of the Trade Marks...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahendra Pratap Singh (Deceased) and Another Vs. Smt. Padam Kumari Dev ...
Allahabad
May-22-1992
Property
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 183; Power of Attorney Act, 1882 - Sections 2; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 77 - Order 3, Rule 1 - Order X, Rules 2 and 4 - Order 26, Rules 7, 13 and 20 - Order 32, Rules 1 to 14, 15, 16 and 21 - Order 32A, Rules 1, 2 and 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 109 and 165
AIR1993All143
A.K. Sharma, ;P.M. Gupta and ;K.S. Chauhan, Advs.
1. A very ugly situation faces the Court, the High Court, in its original jurisdiction in these cases. Many questions have been flung at the Court. The Court must answer them as they are all questions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Bank Vs. K. Usha and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-28-1998
Labour and IndustrialService
Banking Regulation Act, 1949 -- Sections 2 and 45; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 -- Sections 2 and 18 (1); Specific Relief Act, 1963 -- Sections 2 and 19; Constitution of India -- Article 136; Companies Act, 1956
1998IAD(SC)498; AIR1998SC866; JT1998(1)SC265; 1998(1)SCALE226; (1998)2SCC663; [1998]1SCR358
Shri. Ambrish Kumar
ORDERJudgement pronounced by S.B. Majmudar, J.1. Leave granted in Special Leave Petitions.2. By consent of learned advocates appearing for contesting parties this group of nine appeals was heard finally and is being disposed of by this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Mahudeswaran and ors. Vs. Govt. of T.N. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-12-1996
Service
Service Law; Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 10 and 23
1996IVAD(SC)63; [1996(73)FLR1669]; JT1996(5)SC506; 1996(3)SCALE289; (1996)8SCC617; [1996]3SCR312
S. Sivasubramanium,; R. Mohan,; V.G. Pragasam and;
ORDER1. Delay condoned2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.3. Leave granted.4. The facts are not in dispute. Consequent upon the abolition of the post of the Village Officer in the year 1982, around 2000...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »