Advanced Search Results
DolphIn Bar and Restaurant Vs. Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, ...
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-18-2005
Excise
Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970 - Rule 29
2005(2)ALD459; 2005(2)ALT711
T. Amarnath Goud and ;P. Balamukunda Rao, Advs.
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. Certain common questions of fact and law are involved in these two writ petitions. Hence, they are disposed of through a common judgment.2. Petitioner in W.P. No. 209 of 2005 is an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: K.L. Gauba
Mumbai
Apr-23-1954
Civil
Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 10, 10(2), 11, 11(1) and 12; Supreme Court Advocates (Practice in High Courts) Act, 1951 - Sections 2; Supreme Court Rules - Order 4, Rule 30; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23 and 31; Legal Practitioners (Fees) Act, 1926 - Sections 3; Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 13, 28, 29 and 30; Legal Practitioners Act, 1846 - Sections 8; Bombay Pleaders Act, 1920 - Sections 17, 19 and 28; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19; Attorney's and Solicitors Act, 1870
AIR1954Bom478; (1954)56BOMLR838; ILR1955Bom11
H.M. Choksi, Govt. Pleader, For the State of Bombay,
Gajendragadkar, J.1. This is an application under our disciplinary jurisdiction against Mr. K.L. Gauba. It came to the notice of this Court that Mr. Gauba, who is an advocate of this Court, had entered Into an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmar Nath Agarwal Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Delhi
Feb-28-2000
Direct Taxation
(2000)67TTJ(Del)551
C.S. Aggarwal &; RX. Gupta, for the Appellant; Abhey Tayal, for the Responden
ORDERPhool Singh, J.M.:These two appeals of different assessees, relating to the same group, involving lock assessment period 1-4-1986 to 10-10-1996, were heard together and are being disposed of by a composite order for the sake of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shri Tukaram S. Dighole Vs. Shri Manikrao Shivaji Kokate
Mumbai
Jan-25-2008
Election
Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Sections 21, 22, 23, 86, 123(3), 123(4) and 169; Evidence Act - Sections 76; Conduct of Election Rules - Rule 93(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 8, Rule 5; Representation of People Act 1951 - Sections 100(1)
2008(2)ALLMR370; 2008(3)BomCR141; 2008(2)MhLj281
Pradeep Rajgopal, Adv., i/b., Mandar Goswami, Adv.
Nishita Mhatre, J.1. This election petition challenges the declaration of the respondent as the elected candidate from 69, Sinnar constituency at the election held on 13.10.2004. It has been filed by a candidate of the NCP-Congress...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Umeshwar Vs. Electronics Corporation of India, Hyd. and Others
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-27-2000
Civil
Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29, 30, 32 and 33; Legal Practitioners Act, 1879; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3, Rule 2
2000(4)ALD184; 2000(3)ALT791
Mr. S.S. Sonwalkar apppeared, Party-in-person,;Mr. D. Srinivas, SC for ECIL and;Mr. T. Amarnath Goud,(Amicus Curiae)
ORDER1. The petitioner in this writ petition prays for issuance of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Corporation in 'not conducting the enquiry against the 5th respondent which will reveal why the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR. Kannan. Vs. the Government of India, Rep. by Its Secretary, and anr ...
Chennai
Aug-18-2010
Constitution
Constitution Of India - Article 226
Mr. R.N. Amarnath, Adv.
1. The writ petition is filed, seeking an order in the nature of writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent dated 03.04.2003 in No.52/CC/TN/280/2000-FF/SZ and quash the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR. Yadaiah and anr. Vs. Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Ranga R ...
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-15-2002
Commercial
Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 - Sections 31(1); Andhra Pradesh Excise (Lease of Right to Sell Liquor in Retail) Rules - Rule 7
2002(2)ALD839; 2002(6)ALT288
T. Amarnath Goud, Adv.
P.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri Prasanna Kumar, Counsel representing Sri Amarnath Goud, the learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Chandraiah, the learned Government Pleader for Excise.2. The facts of the case are simple. The writ...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamya Wines Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-27-2003
Civil
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign Rules, 1970 - Rules 28, 30 and 66A; Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 - Sections 17 and 28; Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign (Amendment) Rules, 1998 - Rule 2
2003(4)ALD519; 2003(5)ALT780
K.L.N. Swamy and ;Government Pleader for Excise, ;T. Amarnath Goud, ;S. Ramamoorthy, ;M. Sai Murali Krishna, ;P. Laxma Reddy, ;M. Srinivasa Rao, ;O. Manohar Reddy, ;P. Sri Raghuram, ;L.J. Veera Reddy
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. All the petitioners are holders of Form IL-24 licence issued under the A.P. Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970. By virtue of the licence granted to them, they are permitted to sell...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskY. Venkateswar Rao and ors. Vs. Prohibition and Excise Superintendent ...
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-28-2005
Excise
Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 263 and 263(1); Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 - Sections 516, 521, 521(1), 528, 539, 596, 622, 622(2), 623 and 625; Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation Act, 1979; Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968; Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970; Punjab Municipalities Act, 1976 - Sections 90(4); Excise Law; Andhra Pradesh Excise Rules
2006(1)ALD445; 2006(1)ALT443
Amarnath Goud Thodupunuri, ;Venkateswara Rao Kadiam, ;Dhanamjaya, ;A. Jagannadha Rao, ;S.V. Ramana and ;G. Jhansi, Advs.
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. A short, but interesting question, as to power of the Municipality or Municipal Corporation constituted under A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 (for short 'the Municipalities Act') and/or the Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 (for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG. Raj, Manager, Syndicate Bank, Nandanam Branch Vs. the Senior Branch ...
Chennai
Sep-19-2003
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226
(2004)ILLJ290Mad
R.N. Amarnath, Adv.
ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J.1. The writ petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ of certiorari calling for the records of the second respondent in his office proceedings No. ZOCH/PD/OS/154831/STO 232/2003, dated 6.5.2003 and to quash...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »