Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: amarnath · Page 1 of about 1,991 results (0.605 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 18 2005

DolphIn Bar and Restaurant Vs. Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-18-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970 - Rule 29

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD459; 2005(2)ALT711

Advocate for Appellant : T. Amarnath Goud and ;P. Balamukunda Rao, Advs.

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. Certain common questions of fact and law are involved in these two writ petitions. Hence, they are disposed of through a common judgment.2. Petitioner in W.P. No. 209 of 2005 is an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 1954

In Re: K.L. Gauba

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-23-1954

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 10, 10(2), 11, 11(1) and 12; Supreme Court Advocates (Practice in High Courts) Act, 1951 - Sections 2; Supreme Court Rules - Order 4, Rule 30; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23 and 31; Legal Practitioners (Fees) Act, 1926 - Sections 3; Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 13, 28, 29 and 30; Legal Practitioners Act, 1846 - Sections 8; Bombay Pleaders Act, 1920 - Sections 17, 19 and 28; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19; Attorney's and Solicitors Act, 1870

Reported in : AIR1954Bom478; (1954)56BOMLR838; ILR1955Bom11

Advocate for Appellant : H.M. Choksi, Govt. Pleader, For the State of Bombay,

Gajendragadkar, J.1. This is an application under our disciplinary jurisdiction against Mr. K.L. Gauba. It came to the notice of this Court that Mr. Gauba, who is an advocate of this Court, had entered Into an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2000

Amar Nath Agarwal Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-28-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2000)67TTJ(Del)551

Advocate for Appellant : C.S. Aggarwal &; RX. Gupta, for the Appellant; Abhey Tayal, for the Responden

ORDERPhool Singh, J.M.:These two appeals of different assessees, relating to the same group, involving lock assessment period 1-4-1986 to 10-10-1996, were heard together and are being disposed of by a composite order for the sake of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 25 2008

Shri Tukaram S. Dighole Vs. Shri Manikrao Shivaji Kokate

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-25-2008

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Sections 21, 22, 23, 86, 123(3), 123(4) and 169; Evidence Act - Sections 76; Conduct of Election Rules - Rule 93(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 8, Rule 5; Representation of People Act 1951 - Sections 100(1)

Reported in : 2008(2)ALLMR370; 2008(3)BomCR141; 2008(2)MhLj281

Advocate for Appellant : Pradeep Rajgopal, Adv., i/b., Mandar Goswami, Adv.

Nishita Mhatre, J.1. This election petition challenges the declaration of the respondent as the elected candidate from 69, Sinnar constituency at the election held on 13.10.2004. It has been filed by a candidate of the NCP-Congress...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 2000

K. Umeshwar Vs. Electronics Corporation of India, Hyd. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-27-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29, 30, 32 and 33; Legal Practitioners Act, 1879; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3, Rule 2

Reported in : 2000(4)ALD184; 2000(3)ALT791

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.S. Sonwalkar apppeared, Party-in-person,;Mr. D. Srinivas, SC for ECIL and;Mr. T. Amarnath Goud,(Amicus Curiae)

ORDER1. The petitioner in this writ petition prays for issuance of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Corporation in 'not conducting the enquiry against the 5th respondent which will reveal why the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2010

R. Kannan. Vs. the Government of India, Rep. by Its Secretary, and anr ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-18-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.N. Amarnath, Adv.

1. The writ petition is filed, seeking an order in the nature of writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent dated 03.04.2003 in No.52/CC/TN/280/2000-FF/SZ and quash the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2002

R. Yadaiah and anr. Vs. Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Ranga R ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-15-2002

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 - Sections 31(1); Andhra Pradesh Excise (Lease of Right to Sell Liquor in Retail) Rules - Rule 7

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD839; 2002(6)ALT288

Advocate for Appellant : T. Amarnath Goud, Adv.

P.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri Prasanna Kumar, Counsel representing Sri Amarnath Goud, the learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Chandraiah, the learned Government Pleader for Excise.2. The facts of the case are simple. The writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2003

Ramya Wines Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-27-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign Rules, 1970 - Rules 28, 30 and 66A; Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 - Sections 17 and 28; Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign (Amendment) Rules, 1998 - Rule 2

Reported in : 2003(4)ALD519; 2003(5)ALT780

Advocate for Appellant : K.L.N. Swamy and ;Government Pleader for Excise, ;T. Amarnath Goud, ;S. Ramamoorthy, ;M. Sai Murali Krishna, ;P. Laxma Reddy, ;M. Srinivasa Rao, ;O. Manohar Reddy, ;P. Sri Raghuram, ;L.J. Veera Reddy

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. All the petitioners are holders of Form IL-24 licence issued under the A.P. Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970. By virtue of the licence granted to them, they are permitted to sell...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2005

Y. Venkateswar Rao and ors. Vs. Prohibition and Excise Superintendent ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-28-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 263 and 263(1); Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 - Sections 516, 521, 521(1), 528, 539, 596, 622, 622(2), 623 and 625; Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation Act, 1979; Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968; Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970; Punjab Municipalities Act, 1976 - Sections 90(4); Excise Law; Andhra Pradesh Excise Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD445; 2006(1)ALT443

Advocate for Appellant : Amarnath Goud Thodupunuri, ;Venkateswara Rao Kadiam, ;Dhanamjaya, ;A. Jagannadha Rao, ;S.V. Ramana and ;G. Jhansi, Advs.

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. A short, but interesting question, as to power of the Municipality or Municipal Corporation constituted under A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 (for short 'the Municipalities Act') and/or the Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 (for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2003

G. Raj, Manager, Syndicate Bank, Nandanam Branch Vs. the Senior Branch ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-19-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2004)ILLJ290Mad

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Amarnath, Adv.

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J.1. The writ petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ of certiorari calling for the records of the second respondent in his office proceedings No. ZOCH/PD/OS/154831/STO 232/2003, dated 6.5.2003 and to quash...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial