Advanced Search Results

The Province of Bengal Vs. Maulvi Md. Yusuf and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1943Cal122

R.C. Mitter, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Special Land Acquisition Judge passed on a reference made under Section 18, Land Acquisition Act. The question in the appeal is whether the whole...

Asgarali and ors. Vs. Dinanath Kumar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 11; ;Debt Law; ;Bengal Money-lenders Act, 1940 - Sections 30, 30(1) and 31

Reported in : AIR1950Cal135

Advocate for Appellant : Amaresh Chandra Roy, Adv.

Das, J.1. This appeal is on behalf of the plaintiff and arises out of a suit under Section 36, Bengal Money-lenders Act. The suit has been dismissed by the Courts below. The plaintiff now appeals to...

Balurghat Kaliagunge Assn. and ors. Vs. S.T.A. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 63 and 68; ;Bengal Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940 - Rules 64, 83 and 84

Reported in : AIR1957Cal186

Advocate for Appellant : Amaresh Chandra Roy and ;Purnendu Narayan Biswas, Advs. (in No. 139 of 1954), ;Ajoy Kumar Basu, Adv. (in No. 37 of 1955) and ;Amaresh Chandra Roy, Adv. (in No. 38 of 1955)

ORDERSinha, J.1. There are three applications before me, viz., Civil Revision Cases Nos. 139 of 1954, 37 of 1955 and 38 of 1955. These three Rules are based on facts which are common. I shall now...

Asta Bala Dasi Vs. Bejoy Kumar Das and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : LimitationProperty

Acts : Tenancy Law; ;Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 - Section 26F(8); ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 120 and 148

Reported in : AIR1954Cal253

Advocate for Appellant : Amaresh Chandra Roy, Adv. and ;Prafullya Kumar Roy, Jr. Adv.

P.N. Mookerjee, J.1. The principal point -- or I would rather say the only point -- which requires consideration in this appeal is whether a suit by the mortgagor under Section 26-G, Sub-section (8), Clause (a),...

Md. Mahboob and anr. Vs. Bibhuti Bhusan Gupta

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 480

Reported in : AIR1960Cal63

Advocate for Appellant : Amaresh Chandra Roy and ;Sudhindra Kumar Palit, Advs.;Bimal Chandra Chatterjee, Adv. for No. 533, ;Ajit Kumar Dutt and ;Bimal Chandra Chatterjee, Advs. for No. 535/55, ;N.K. Basu and ;Surathi Mohan Sa

Bhattacharya, J.1. These four petitions in revision are heard together for the sate of convenience. In two cases, Rules were obtained by the accused and in the other two Rules were granted to the complainant regarding...

Saibal Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. B.K. Sen

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 134, 134(1) and 215; ;Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Section 3

Reported in : AIR1959Cal106,1959CriLJ172

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Bose, ;E. Meyer and ;Bireswar Chatterjee, Advs.;Amaresh Chandra Roy, Adv.

P. Chakravartti, C.J. 1. The three petitioners before us have been found by a Division Beach to have committed contempt of this Court as also the Court of a Magistrate and have been sentenced to pay...

Metropolitan Structural Works Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 29 and 47(7)

Reported in : AIR1956Cal396,[1955]28ITR432(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Amaresh Chandra Roy and ;Kishore Mukherjee, Advs.

Chakkavartti, C.J.1. The short point involved in this case is a point of limitation. It appears that the petitioner was assessed to a certain amount of tax and in respect of the amount so assessed, a...

Krishna Khandelwal and anr. Vs. Director of Land Hiring and Disposal E ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Requisitioned Land (Continuance of Powers) Act, 1947 - Section 3; ; Requisitioned Land (Continuance of Powers) Act, 1946; ; Defence of India Rules, 1939 - Rules 43 and 75A; ; Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 31, 31(5) and 226

Reported in : AIR1952Cal16,56CWN306

Advocate for Appellant : Amaresh Chandra Roy and ; J.M. Bannerjea, Advs.

ORDERDas, J.1. This Rule was obtained by the petitioners calling upon the opposite parties to show cause why a writ in the nature of mandamus should not be issued and possession of the premises mentioned in...

Nagendra Nath Choudhury Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 233 and 439; ;Bengal Highways Act, 1925; ;West Bengal Highways (Amendment) Act, 1953 - Section 2

Reported in : AIR1955Cal555,1955CriLJ1356

Advocate for Appellant : Amaresh Chandra Roy, Adv.

ORDERDebabrata Mookerjee, J.1. The petitioner is being proceeded against for alleged infringements of the provisions of the Bengal Highways Act 3 of 1925 as amended by the West Bengal Act 17 of 1953 before a Magistrate...

Ram Dayal Tewari Vs. Corporation of Calcutta

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 - Sections 386, 386(1), 488 and 531; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 208, 338 and 340

Reported in : AIR1953Cal76,56CWN329

Advocate for Appellant : Amaresh Chandra Roy, Adv.

Chakravartti, J. 1. The petitioner hag been convicted under Section 386 (i) (c), read with Section 488, Calcutta Municipal Act, for having kept some cattle at NOS. 22A and 22B, Southern Avenue, without having a license...