Advanced Search Results

Shri Rajesh Bhardwaj Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 389; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 313, 406, 498A and 506

Reported in : 2008(101)DRJ380

Advocate for Appellant : Aman Lekhi, Sr. Adv. an; Dhanesh Relan, Adv

Reva Khetrapal, J.1. This is an application filed by the appellant under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking suspension of his substantive sentence during the pendency of the appeal in this Court.2. The...

Kamaljeet Singh (In Judicial Custody) Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Control of organized Crimes Act, 1999 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 3(4), 3(5), 4, 12, 14, 18, 18(1), 18(4), 23(1) and 23(2); Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 8 and 9; Immoral Traffic (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 1986; Contract Act; Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 21; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules, 1987 - Rule 15; Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002; Cattle-trespass Act, 1871 - Sections 21; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 7; Petroleum Storage and Distribution Act; Evidence Act, 1872; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 146, 153A, 255, 249, 260, 263, 376, 400, 401, 413, 420, 472, 474 and 478; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2(4) and 506; Constitution of In

Reported in : 148(2008)DLT170; 2008(101)DRJ582

Advocate for Appellant : Aman Lekhi, Sr. Adv.; Madhukar Pandey; Jaspreet S. Rai; Rajan K. Chourasia; Rakesh Kumar an; Rohit Nagpal

Reva Khetrapal, J.1. By this appeal filed under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Control of organized Crimes Act, 1999 (for short the MCOCA), the appellant seeks to assail the order on charge dated 12th October, 2006...

Siddhartha Behura Vs. C.B.i.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 468, 471, 120B; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 13(2), 13(1)(d); Constitution of India

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Aman Lekhi; Mr. Pramod Jalan; Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi, Advs.

1. Siddhartha Behura, the petitioner herein is seeking bail in case RC No.DAI-2009-A-0045 P.S. ACB, CBI New Delhi under Sections 420, 468, 471 and 120B IPC and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the P.C. Act....

Delhi High Court Bar Association and Anr. Vs. Hon'ble Chief Justice Hi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 1991 - Sections 4

Reported in : 50(1993)DLT532; 1993(26)DRJ99

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Lekhi,; Aman Lekhi,; Ashok Kashyap,;

D.P. Wadhwa, J. (1) The petitioners, numbering two, by this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seek a declaration that 4 of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 1991 (for short 'the...

Keshav Metal Works and anr. Vs. Jitender Kumar Verma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 1994IAD(Delhi)81; 1994(28)DRJ206; 1994RLR126

Advocate for Appellant : Aman Lekhi and; Vijay Kishan, Advs

Usha Mehra, J.(1) M/.S. Keshav Metal Works and Mrs. Manorma Vaid, petitioners herein were tenant in the premises bearing No.A-8/A-7/2 New Friends Colony, New Delhi. respondent Mr. J.K. Verma,landlord of the premises sought the eviction under...

Sh. Arun Mehra and anr. Vs. Durga Builders Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Company Act, 1956 - Sections 111, 235, 237, 397, 398, 402 and 403; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 37

Reported in : [2007]138CompCas935(Delhi); (2007)6CompLJ465(Del); [2007]75SCL1(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Aman Lekhi, Sr. Adv. and; Jayant Mehta, Adv. in Co. Appeal No. 7/2006 and Parag Tripathi, Sr. Adv in Co

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. The two appeals are directed against a common order dated 2.2.2006 passed by the Company Law Board disposing of CP No.54/2005 and CP No. 59/2005.2. Vide the CP No. 54/2005, Arun Mehra and...

V.L.S. Finance Limited and anr. Vs. High Court of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 15 and 20; ; Constitution of India - Articles 129 and 215

Advocate for Appellant : Aman Lekhi, Sr. Adv.,; Meenakshi Lekhi,; Vishal Balecha

Valmiki J. Mehta, J.1. The issue raised in the present petition by the petitioner is if the Law Officer as mentioned in Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred as the Act...

Tata Sky Ltd. and Another Vs. Espn Software India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : For Petitioner: Mr.Aman Lekhi, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Kuashik Mishra and Ms.Sngandha Somani, Advocates. For Respondent: Mr.N. Ganapathy, Advocate.

S.B. Sinha Introduction Validity and/or legality of several provisions of the Reference Interconnect Order issued by the respondent herein is in question in these petitions wherein the following prayers have been made :- (a) Set aside...

S.P.Gupta Vs. Ashutosh Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalContract

Acts : Criminal Procedure Code - Section 482; Indian Penal Code - Sections 420(34), 120(B), 415; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Section 18

Reported in : 2010(6)SCC562

Advocate for Appellant : Aman Lekhi, Adv.

ALTAMAS KABIR, J. 1. In this Special Leave Petition, the Petitioner, S.P. Gupta, has challenged the order dated 19th February, 2008, passed by the learned Single Judge 2 of the Delhi High Court in Crl.M.C. No.847...

Mukhtiar Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302

Reported in : AIR2009SC1854; 2009CriLJ1744; JT2009(1)SC443; 2009(1)SCALE655; (2009)11SCC257; 2009AIRSCW1475; 2009(1)LHSC521; 2009(2)KCCR1376

Advocate for Appellant : Aman Lekhi, Sr. Adv.,; Ajay Kumar Jain,; Meenakshi Lekhi,

Mukundakam Sharma, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment and order of the Division Bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court, allowing the appeal filed by the respondent State. By the impugned judgment the...