Advanced Search Results
S.K. Kapur vs. N.D.M.C.
Delhi
Aug-09-2002
Service
101(2002)DLT347
S.K. Jain, Adv
Manmohan Sarin, J. 1. Rule.With the consent of the parties, writ petition is taken up for disposal.2. Petitioner was employed with NDMC as Head Assistant and sought voluntary retirement w.e.f. 31.3.1981. Petitioner was entitled to medical...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskL. NizamuddIn Vs. Union of India
Delhi
Dec-19-1997
Service
Air Force Rules, 1961 - Rule 7; Air Force Regulations, 1961 - Regulation 173;
1998IAD(Delhi)787; 1998(45)DRJ370
R.N. Sharma and ; Alapana Poddar, Advs
Usha Mehra, J.(1) Petitioner was recruited in the Indian Army on 3rd December, 1968. At the time of his enrolment in the Army he was considered medically fit and fixed in medical category 'AYE'. Petitioner successfully...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBeena Chattree Vs. D.D.A.
Delhi
May-01-2006
Service
130(2006)DLT91; 2006(90)DRJ257; 2007(1)SLJ329(Delhi)
J.P. Singh, Adv
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. Issue Rule. Ms. Alpana Poddar, counsel for respondent waives notice of Rule. With consent of counsel for the parties the petition was heard finally.2. The controversy in this case is as to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shri Girdhari Singh Negi Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council and anr.
Delhi
Aug-27-2001
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 39
2002(61)DRJ161
Mr. Sanjay Parikh, Adv
ORDERVikramajit Sen, J. 1. In this writ petition filed in September 1999 the Petitioner has prayed for the regularisation of his services as an Office Attendant and for the payment of equal pay for equal work....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSharita Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Feb-18-1998
Service
Regulations for the medical service of the Armed Forces - Sections 423
1998IVAD(Delhi)330; 74(1998)DLT6
Mr. N.L. Bareja, Adv
ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The Petitioner's claim for grant of special family pension was rejected by the respondents on 22.02.1996.2. The case of the petitioner tersely stated in the following terms. The husband of the petitioner was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKhema Nand (L/Nk.) Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Jul-19-1999
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226
2000IIIAD(Delhi)316; 2000(53)DRJ397
Mr. N.L. Bareja, Adv
ORDERK. Ramamurthy, J.1. The writ petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :- 'In view of the aforesaid submissions and in the interest of justice, it is, thereforee, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. J.K. Goel, Jr. Engineer Vs. Delhi Development Authority Through It ...
Delhi
Feb-14-2005
Civil
117(2005)DLT652; 2005(80)DRJ652
Apurb Lal, Adv
Vijender Jain, J.1. Counsel for the appellant has contended that his matter may be disposed of in terms of the decision in DDA vs. B.R. Sehgal in LPA No.955/2002 decided on 2nd February, 2005 where Division...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaurang Singh (Ex- Constable ) Vs. the Director General
Delhi
Jul-16-1998
Service
1998VAD(Delhi)7; 74(1998)DLT377; 1998(46)DRJ482
Mr. C.M Khanna, Adv
ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the order of removal dated 01.04.1992 which was confirmed in appeal by order dated 24.12.1992 and the order by the Revisional Authority dated 22.09.1993.2. The case of the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPahlad Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Mar-10-1998
Constitution
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226
1998IVAD(Delhi)52; 72(1998)DLT572; 1998(45)DRJ165
Mr. S.K. Choudhary, Adv
Dr. M.K. Sharma, J.1. By this writ petition, the petitioners have sought for quashing of the letters dated 6th October, 1981, 3rd January, 1983 and 29th July, 1986, whereby the respondent No.1 rejected the applications filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Mange Ram Gupta Vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee
Delhi
May-02-2002
Property
Motor Vehicles Act; Specific Relief Act - Sections 41; Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 56 and 173; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100 - Order 10, Rule 2; Urban Land Ceiling (Regulations) Act
2002IVAD(Delhi)973; 99(2002)DLT129; 2002(63)DRJ51
L.R. Gupta, Sr. Adv. and; J.N. Aggarwal, Adv
R. C. Jain, J.1. A triangular piece of land measuring about 45 square yards exists in front of Premises No. 7., Tolstoy Lane, New Delhi is the subject matter of this second appeal which has been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »