Advanced Search Results

Smt. Rana Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1972 - Sections 5, 5(1) and 9; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC3016

Khem Karan, J. 1. In this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Smt. Rana Singh has prayed for the following reliefs : (a) to command the opposite parties to ensure...

Rajesh Malhotra Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: Santosh Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, Mrs. B. Rana, R2, S.M. Zulfiqar Alam, R4, Alok Gupta, R6, S.K. Singh, Advocates.

DR. RAMESH CHandRA PandA, MEMBER (A): 1. The applicant is an officer of the Indian Information Service (IIS) and belongs to 1989 batch. He is aggrieved by the seniority list issued by the official respondents dated...

Punjab National Bank Vs. Leo Electronics and Allied Industries and Sh. ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 163; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 - Schedule - Article 122; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 9, Rule 9

Reported in : II(2007)BC237; 137(2007)DLT43; 2007(94)DRJ483

Advocate for Appellant : Purnima Maheshwari, Adv

J.M. Malik, J.1. At the centre of the controversy is the question whether the appellant offered sufficient and reasonable cause for not filing application under Order 9 Rule 9 within the leeway granted by law. This...

M/s Aravali Power Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Vedprakash

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : GAURAV __

CA16921693/2020 1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos 1692-1693 of 2020 M/s Aravali Power Co Pvt Ltd Appellant Versus Vedprakash and Another Respondents W I T H Civil Appeal...

Sisir Kumar Dutta and ors. Vs. Susil Kumar Dutta

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Section 7; ;Suits Valuation Act, 1887 - Sections 3 and 8

Reported in : AIR1961Cal229,65CWN1

Advocate for Appellant : Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv.

Banerjee, J. 1. This is a reference to a Special Division Bench,under the second proviso to Rule 1 Ch. II of the High Court Appellate Side Rules. The particularquestion of law referred for determination by theSpecial...

Sanjeev Kumar Chaswal Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

Reported in : 2012(5)CTC(IP)22

SURESH KAIT, J. 1. Vide the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking the following reliefs:- “I. Issue a writ of certiorari thereby quashing the illegal opinion of the Vice Chairman IPAB wherein the Vice Chairman has...

Alok Gupta & Ors. vs the State Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Anubhav Dadhich, Ms. Manjeet Arya, Mr. Abhimanyu Arya, Mr. Kuldeep Singh

$~31 & 77* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4202/2026 CRL.M.A. 16970/2026 ALOK GUPTA & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anubhav Dadhich, Adv.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet...

Dr. Ghanshyam Dev and anr. Vs. Dr. Ranbir Singh and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956 - Rule 24 and 24(1); ;Jammu and Kashmir Medical Education (Gazetted) Recruitment Rules, 1979 - Rule 13; ;Government Doctors (Relaxation of Restrictions on Private Practice) Rules, 1987 - Rule 4

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ1

Advocate for Appellant : A.V. Gupta, Sr. Adv.,; K.R. Gupta and; Y.E. Tak, Adv

J.P. Singh, J.1. Aggrieved by judgment dated 16.07.1999 of the Writ Court and the interpretation of learned Single Judge of Rule 24(1Kb) of Jammu & Kashmir Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules 1956, Dr. Ghanshyam...

Sarvesh Kumar Vs. Pwd and anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Alok Gupta, Ms. Pinky Anand, Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Ms. Namrata Sharma, Mr. Amar Nath Saini, Mr. Abul Sattar, Mr. Amiet Andlay, Mr. Arun K. Sharma, Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Ms. Zubeda Begum, Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Ms. Bandana Shukla

$~46,10,14,23 to 28 and 40&41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:10. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5118/2013 & CM 11517/2013 M/S BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr....

Pratibha Advertising Pvt Ltd Vs. Pwd and anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Alok Gupta, Ms. Pinky Anand, Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Ms. Namrata Sharma, Mr. Amar Nath Saini, Mr. Abul Sattar, Mr. Amiet Andlay, Mr. Arun K. Sharma, Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Ms. Zubeda Begum, Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Ms. Bandana Shukla

$~46,10,14,23 to 28 and 40&41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:10. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5118/2013 & CM 11517/2013 M/S BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr....