Advanced Search Results
Terumo Penpol Private Limited vs.union of India and Anr.
Delhi
Feb-25-2019
Land Acquisition
Mr. S. Ganesh, Mr. Samudra Sarangi, Ms. Shruti Raina, Mr. Shahab Ahmad
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1922/2019 & CM Nos. 8947-8948/2019 TERUMO PENPOL PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Mr Samudra Sarangi, Ms Shruti...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Singari Devi and ors. Vs. Govind Thakur and ors.
Patna
May-02-2006
CivilFamily
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 8, 12, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 16 and 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 22, Rules 1, 2, 3 and 4; Hindu Law
Pushkar Narain Shahi, Partha Sarthy, Ritesh Kumar No. 1, Kumar Vikram, Onkar Nath, Ved Prakash Roy and Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advs.
Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.1. This civil revision application raises an interesting issue arising out of a matter relating to substitution of legal representatives of deceased-plaintiff under Order 22 Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure (In...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Singari Devi and ors. Vs. Govind Thakur and ors.
Jharkhand
May-02-2006
Civil
[2006(4)JCR683(Jhr)]
Shri. Pushkar Narain Shahi
Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.1. This civil revision application raises an interesting issue arising out of a matter relating to substitution of legal representatives of deceased-plaintiff under Order XXII, Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sm. Krishna Sarbadhikary Vs. Alok Ranjan Sarbadhikary
Kolkata
May-16-1984
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 13(1)
AIR1985Cal431,89CWN156
B.C. Dutt and ;Bhaskar Bhattacharjee, Advs.
Chittatosh Mookerjee, J.1. The principal question in this appeal is whether the learned Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Alipore was justified in dissolving the marriage of the appellant wife with the respondent husband on the ground...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrakash Chand Vs. State of H.P.
Himachal Pradesh
Apr-25-2007
Criminal
2007(II)ShimLC334
V.K. Ahuja, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment of the Court of learned Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Hamirpur, dated 31.12.2005, vide which the appellant was held guilty under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamesh Chandra Biswas Vs. the State and anr.
Kolkata
Apr-29-1993
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 42, 252, 375(B) and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 201, 218, 290 and 302; ;Arms Act, 1955 - Sections 25 and 27; ;Indian Explosive Act - Section 9(3)
(1993)2CALLT310(HC),97CWN1053
Alok Ranjan Sengupta and ;Kollol Das Gupta, Advs.;Manas Ranjan Chakrabarty and ;Pratima Goswami, Advs.
A.K. Dutta, J.1. The question emerging for consideration in the instant Revisional Application by the Petitioner Under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is whether a police officer can be prosecuted for an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSirtaj Constructions Ltd. Vs. Col. Suresh Chander Dogra and anr.
Himachal Pradesh
Mar-18-2005
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2
AIR2005HP47
Alok Ranjan and; K.D. Sood, Advs.
ORDERM.R. Verma, J. 1. This application under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure is preferred by the applicant/plaintiff (hereafter referred to as 'the plaintiff') seeking interim...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Sandhya Basu Mallick and Anr. Vs. Sri Pramatha Nath Sen
Kolkata
Dec-15-2016
Land Acquisition
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present: The Hon’ble Justice Shivakant Prasad CS No.540 of 1988 Smt. Sandhya Basu Mallick & Anr. Versus Sri Pramatha Nath Sen For the plaintiffs...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGaurab Chauhan Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Patna
Mar-30-1993
Constitution
S.B. Sinha, J.1. In this application the petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the respondents to allow him to sit in the 1990 Supplementary Examination to be held from 4th July, 1992.2. The fact of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJanak Singh Vs. Ram Das Rai and ors.
Patna
Sep-26-2003
Election
Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 81, 82, 83 and 117; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rule 63
S.N.P. Sharma, Adv. for the Election Petitioner
P.K. Deb, J. 1. This petition has been filed under Sections 80, 80A and 81 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') questioning the election of returned candidate, namely, Ram...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »