Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: alok ranjan and · Page 1 of about 49 results (0.085 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 25 2019

Terumo Penpol Private Limited vs.union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-25-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Ganesh, Mr. Samudra Sarangi, Ms. Shruti Raina, Mr. Shahab Ahmad

$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1922/2019 & CM Nos. 8947-8948/2019 TERUMO PENPOL PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Mr Samudra Sarangi, Ms Shruti...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2006

Ram Singari Devi and ors. Vs. Govind Thakur and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-02-2006

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 8, 12, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 16 and 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 22, Rules 1, 2, 3 and 4; Hindu Law

Advocate for Appellant : Pushkar Narain Shahi, Partha Sarthy, Ritesh Kumar No. 1, Kumar Vikram, Onkar Nath, Ved Prakash Roy and Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advs.

Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.1. This civil revision application raises an interesting issue arising out of a matter relating to substitution of legal representatives of deceased-plaintiff under Order 22 Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure (In...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2006

Ram Singari Devi and ors. Vs. Govind Thakur and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-02-2006

Subject : Civil

Reported in : [2006(4)JCR683(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Pushkar Narain Shahi

Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.1. This civil revision application raises an interesting issue arising out of a matter relating to substitution of legal representatives of deceased-plaintiff under Order XXII, Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 16 1984

Sm. Krishna Sarbadhikary Vs. Alok Ranjan Sarbadhikary

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-16-1984

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 13(1)

Reported in : AIR1985Cal431,89CWN156

Advocate for Appellant : B.C. Dutt and ;Bhaskar Bhattacharjee, Advs.

Chittatosh Mookerjee, J.1. The principal question in this appeal is whether the learned Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Alipore was justified in dissolving the marriage of the appellant wife with the respondent husband on the ground...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2007

Prakash Chand Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-25-2007

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2007(II)ShimLC334

V.K. Ahuja, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment of the Court of learned Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Hamirpur, dated 31.12.2005, vide which the appellant was held guilty under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 1993

Ramesh Chandra Biswas Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-29-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 42, 252, 375(B) and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 201, 218, 290 and 302; ;Arms Act, 1955 - Sections 25 and 27; ;Indian Explosive Act - Section 9(3)

Reported in : (1993)2CALLT310(HC),97CWN1053

Advocate for Appellant : Alok Ranjan Sengupta and ;Kollol Das Gupta, Advs.;Manas Ranjan Chakrabarty and ;Pratima Goswami, Advs.

A.K. Dutta, J.1. The question emerging for consideration in the instant Revisional Application by the Petitioner Under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is whether a police officer can be prosecuted for an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2005

Sirtaj Constructions Ltd. Vs. Col. Suresh Chander Dogra and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-18-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR2005HP47

Advocate for Appellant : Alok Ranjan and; K.D. Sood, Advs.

ORDERM.R. Verma, J. 1. This application under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure is preferred by the applicant/plaintiff (hereafter referred to as 'the plaintiff') seeking interim...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2016

Smt. Sandhya Basu Mallick and Anr. Vs. Sri Pramatha Nath Sen

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-15-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present: The Hon’ble Justice Shivakant Prasad CS No.540 of 1988 Smt. Sandhya Basu Mallick & Anr. Versus Sri Pramatha Nath Sen For the plaintiffs...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1993

Gaurab Chauhan Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-30-1993

Subject : Constitution

S.B. Sinha, J.1. In this application the petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the respondents to allow him to sit in the 1990 Supplementary Examination to be held from 4th July, 1992.2. The fact of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2003

Janak Singh Vs. Ram Das Rai and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-26-2003

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 81, 82, 83 and 117; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rule 63

Advocate for Appellant : S.N.P. Sharma, Adv. for the Election Petitioner

P.K. Deb, J. 1. This petition has been filed under Sections 80, 80A and 81 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') questioning the election of returned candidate, namely, Ram...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial