Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: alok aradhe · Page 1 of about 437 results (0.060 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Jan 16 2003

Daya Ram and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-16-2003

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 234, 237 (1), 237(3); Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code Amendment Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code Amendment Act, 2001 - Sections 9; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16(4), 21, 40 and 243-G; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam 1993 - Sections 7 and 7A; Karnataka Rules - Rule 5

Reported in : 2003(4)MPHT435

Advocate for Appellant : Imtiaz Husain, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 3300, 3302, 4072, 4073, 4074, 4075, 4259, 4260, 4261, 4282, 4283, 4536, 6972, 6973 and 6974/2002 ;Narendra Sharma, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 4264, 4265, 4395 and 7098/2002, ;A

ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. The questions of law involved being similar and the writ petitions being inter linked and inter connected were heard analogously and are hereby disposed of by this common order. As the pleadings...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
May 13 2004

Surtyomal Vs. Smt. Chandabai

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-13-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Madhya Pradesh Accomodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 23E and 23E(2)

Reported in : AIR2004MP225; 2004(3)MPLJ438

Advocate for Appellant : Alok Aradhe and ;V. Tripathi, Advs.

Arun Mishra, J.1. This reference has been made by the learned single Judge Hon'ble Shri Justice S.K. Pandey on the question whether revision under Section 23-E of M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter to be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Apr 24 2000

Kunjulal Yadu and ors. Vs. Parasram Sharma

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-24-2000

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 23A, 23C and 23J; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR2000MP235; 2000(3)MPHT355; 2000(2)MPLJ514

Advocate for Appellant : Alok Aradhe, Adv.

Dipak Misra, J. 1. Finding conflict between two Division Bench decisions rendered in the cases of B. Jhonson Bernard v. C. S. Naidu, 1985 MPLJ 675 and Jenendra Kumar v. Roshanlal, 1994 JLJ 19, the learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Sep 28 2001

Raj Kumar College Society and anr. Vs. State of M.P. (Now Chhattisgarh ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Sep-28-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 295, 295(3), 299A and 307

Reported in : 2002(2)MPHT12(CG)

Advocate for Appellant : Alok Aradhe, Adv.

ORDERR.S. Garg, J. 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners seek to challenge the correctness, validity and propriety of the order dated 6-5-2000. (Annexure P-19) passed by the Ministry...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Apr 26 2000

Swarnjee Singh Vs. Asharam Gamne

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-26-2000

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 22, Rule 10; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 12(1)

Reported in : 2001(1)MPHT396

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Alok Aradhe, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. In this civil revision preferred under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') the defendant-petitioner has called in question the legal validity of the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
May 08 2000

Mahesh Kumar Jagatramka Vs. Suresh Kumar Jagatramka and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-08-2000

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR2000MP324; 2000(3)MPLJ590

Advocate for Appellant : Alok Aradhe, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short `the CPC') the defendant No. 4/petitioner has called in question the legal validity of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Apr 25 2000

Suryakant Chandrakar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-25-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Notaries Rules, 1956 - Rules 6 and 7

Reported in : AIR2000MP260

Advocate for Appellant : Alok Aradhe and ;Sharad Verma, Advs.

ORDERC.K. Prasad, J. 1. Suryakant Chandrakar (petitioner in W.P. No. 3715/1998), Mukund Marotirao Khanti (petitioner in W.P. No. 2704/98) as also Smt. Gyani Lunia, (respondent No. 3 in both the writ petitions), Manju Kiran Kalia (respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
May 08 2000

Mahesh Kumar Jagatramka Vs. Suresh Kumar Jagatramka and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-08-2000

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 10 and 115 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order XXXIII, Rules 1 and 2; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Reported in : 2001(2)MPHT116

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Alok Aradhe, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short 'the CPC') the defendant No. 4/petitioner has called in question the legal validity of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Feb 28 2000

Ghanshyamdas Vyas and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-28-2000

Subject : CompanyCommercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 5, 5(1), 6, 11, 11(3), 11 (4), 17-A and 17-A (2); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3 (1); Mineral Concessions Rules, 1960 - Rules 54, 75 and 75(A) (2); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001(1)MPHT22; 2000(2)MPLJ571

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Alok Aradhe, Adv.

ORDERC.K. Prasad, J. 1.Both the writ petitions have been directed to be heard together. Facts emanating from the pleading of W.P. No. 5462/99 are being narrated hereinafter for disposal of both the writ petitions.1-a. Petitioner applied...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Dec 02 1998

Ranu Wd/O Sudhir Ghosh Vs. Rai Bahadur Bhootnath Dey and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-02-1998

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 12, 12(1), 13(1), 13(6) and 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 33

Reported in : 1999(1)MPLJ388

Advocate for Appellant : Alok Aradhe, Adv.

ORDERR.S. Garg, J.Shri Alok Aradhe, learned counsel for the applicant.Shri H.B. Agrawal, Learned counsel for the non-applicant No. 1.1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is finally heard.2. In a suit filed under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales