Advanced Search Results
S.P. Dhandapani Pondicherry Vs. the State Transport Authority and Othe ...
Chennai
Aug-06-1992
Motor Vehicles
Constitution of India - Article 226; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 51(9), 89(1) and 90; Pondicherry Motor Vehicles Taxation Act ; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939
AIR1993Mad44
Mr. K. Alagiriswami, Sr. Adv. and;Mr. C.S. Prakasa Rao, Adv.
ORDER1. The petitioner has filed theabove writ petition to call for the records inF.No. TD/TP.1/11/92 dated 4-3-1992 on thefile of the 1st respondent and quash the sameand for any other appropriate order ordirection.2. The petitioner's grievance...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Ponnusamy Vs. Returning Officer and Special Grade Executive Officer ...
Chennai
Dec-18-2000
Election
Tamil Nadu Panchayat (Election) Rules, 1995 - Rules 63 and 64 to 67;
(2001)1MLJ649
Mr. K. Alagiriswamy, ;Senior Counsel for Mr. V. Chithranjandoss
ORDER1. The writ petition is for the issue of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records connected with the judgment and decree dated 23.9.1998 made in Election Original Petition No.67 of 1996 on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskE.i.D. Parry India Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India and anr.
Chennai
Mar-14-1986
Excise
Tamil Nadu Act, 1979; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 46 and 49; Tamil Nadu Act, 1946; Tamil Nadu Essential Articles Control and Regulationing (Temporary Powers) Act, 1949; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19(1) and 201; Sale of Goods Act - Sections 64-A; Tariff Act - Sections 4; Excise Act
1987(27)ELT64(Mad)
S. Ramasubramaniam, ;King and Pattridge and ;K. Alagiriswami, Advs.
ORDER1. In all these writ petitions, petitioners have sought for issue of a writ of Mandamus to forbear respondents from demanding and collecting the Central Excise Surcharge of three paise per unit as provided in Part...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
A. Sahadevan Pillai and ors. Vs. T. Vasanthakumari and anr.
Chennai
Sep-30-1993
Family
(1994)1MLJ60
Mr. S.P. Subramaniam
A.R. Lakshmanan, J.1. A.A.O. No. 994 of 1992 is against the order of the District Judge of Kanyakumari, dated 13.10.1992 in O.P. No. 26 of 1991. The respondents in O.P. No. 26 of 1991 are the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.G. Narayanaswami Naidu and anr. Vs. M. Balasundaram Naidu and ors.
Chennai
Sep-28-1951
FamilyTrusts and Societies
Hindu Law; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 42; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 11 and 92; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 142 and 144
AIR1953Mad750; (1952)1MLJ487
P.S. Raghavarama Sastri and ;M.R. Narayanaswami, Advs.
1. Both these appeals arise out of the decrees of the Sub-Court, Madura in O. S. No. 1 of 1946, wherein a preliminary decree for the framing of a scheme, after removing the appellant from ithe...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMuthu Karu V. Alagappa Chettiar and anr. Vs. Krishnier and ors.
Chennai
Nov-25-1925
Contract
AIR1927Mad62; 97Ind.Cas.866
Venkatasubba Rao, J.1. The question to be decided in this appeal is whether the plaintiff is entitled to the return of the advance paid by him in respect of a yarn contract. The contract was entered...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Kunjithapatham and ors. Vs. the Thiruvilaiyattam Village Co-operati ...
Chennai
Aug-11-1978
Trusts and Societies
(1979)1MLJ6
ORDERT. Ramaprasada Rao, C.J.1. The interesting question raised in this civil revision petition is whether the proceedings initiated against the petitioners, amongst others, under Section 71 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, is maintainable at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Ram Mohan and Co Rep. by Its Proprietrix R. Renuka and Another Vs ...
Chennai
Mar-19-1999
Property
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 100 and 106; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 -- Sections 11 -- Order 43, Rule 1; Registration Act, 1908 -- Sections 17 and 49; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960
1999(3)CTC40; (1999)3MLJ423
Mr. K. Alagiriswamy, Senior Counsel for ;Mr. A. Veerasamy, Advs.
ORDER1. These Second Appeals are directed against a common judgment of the learned District Judge, Coimbatore, in A.S.Nos. 150, 215 and 216 of 1992.2. O.S.No. 1397 of 1987 on the file of the Sub-Court, Coimbatore, was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askintegral Coach Factory Staff Council and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...
Chennai
May-25-1993
Labour and Industrial
Indian Railway Establishment Code, 1951; Constitution of India - Article 309
(1994)ILLJ678Mad; (1993)IIMLJ343
K. Alagiriswami, Adv. for T.K. Rajeswaran, Adv. and ;C.M. Krishnakumar, Adv.
Abdul Hadi, J.1. A decision on a short point would dispose of the above referred to two writ appeals against W.P. No. 16141 of 1991, according to Mr. K. Alagiriswami, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDove Investments Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. Gujarat Industrial Investme ...
Chennai
Dec-30-2004
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F, 108(1A), 108(1B), 108(1C), 108(1D) and 111A
[2005]124CompCas399(Mad); (2005)6CompLJ490(Mad); 2005(1)CTC249; (2005)1MLJ269; [2005]60SCL604(Mad)
S. Alagiriswamy, Sr. Counsel for ;S. Murugan, Adv. for Appellants in CMA No. 3188/2004 and ;P.H. Aravindh Pandian, Adv. for Appellant in C.M.A. No. 3223/2004
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. By consent of all the parties, the Appeals themselves have (been) taken up for disposal. M/s. Dove Investments Private Limited, Mumbai-21; M/s. Max worth Investments Private Limited, Chennai-34; and Mr. P.N. Mohan, partner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »