Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: alagiriswami · Page 1 of about 761 results (0.134 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 06 1992

S.P. Dhandapani Pondicherry Vs. the State Transport Authority and Othe ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-06-1992

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 51(9), 89(1) and 90; Pondicherry Motor Vehicles Taxation Act ; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939

Reported in : AIR1993Mad44

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K. Alagiriswami, Sr. Adv. and;Mr. C.S. Prakasa Rao, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner has filed theabove writ petition to call for the records inF.No. TD/TP.1/11/92 dated 4-3-1992 on thefile of the 1st respondent and quash the sameand for any other appropriate order ordirection.2. The petitioner's grievance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2000

N. Ponnusamy Vs. Returning Officer and Special Grade Executive Officer ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-18-2000

Subject : Election

Acts : Tamil Nadu Panchayat (Election) Rules, 1995 - Rules 63 and 64 to 67;

Reported in : (2001)1MLJ649

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K. Alagiriswamy, ;Senior Counsel for Mr. V. Chithranjandoss

ORDER1. The writ petition is for the issue of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records connected with the judgment and decree dated 23.9.1998 made in Election Original Petition No.67 of 1996 on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 1986

E.i.D. Parry India Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-14-1986

Subject : Excise

Acts : Tamil Nadu Act, 1979; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 46 and 49; Tamil Nadu Act, 1946; Tamil Nadu Essential Articles Control and Regulationing (Temporary Powers) Act, 1949; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19(1) and 201; Sale of Goods Act - Sections 64-A; Tariff Act - Sections 4; Excise Act

Reported in : 1987(27)ELT64(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Ramasubramaniam, ;King and Pattridge and ;K. Alagiriswami, Advs.

ORDER1. In all these writ petitions, petitioners have sought for issue of a writ of Mandamus to forbear respondents from demanding and collecting the Central Excise Surcharge of three paise per unit as provided in Part...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 30 1993

A. Sahadevan Pillai and ors. Vs. T. Vasanthakumari and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-30-1993

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1994)1MLJ60

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.P. Subramaniam

A.R. Lakshmanan, J.1. A.A.O. No. 994 of 1992 is against the order of the District Judge of Kanyakumari, dated 13.10.1992 in O.P. No. 26 of 1991. The respondents in O.P. No. 26 of 1991 are the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 1951

M.G. Narayanaswami Naidu and anr. Vs. M. Balasundaram Naidu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-28-1951

Subject : FamilyTrusts and Societies

Acts : Hindu Law; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 42; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 11 and 92; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 142 and 144

Reported in : AIR1953Mad750; (1952)1MLJ487

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Raghavarama Sastri and ;M.R. Narayanaswami, Advs.

1. Both these appeals arise out of the decrees of the Sub-Court, Madura in O. S. No. 1 of 1946, wherein a preliminary decree for the framing of a scheme, after removing the appellant from ithe...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1925

Muthu Karu V. Alagappa Chettiar and anr. Vs. Krishnier and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-25-1925

Subject : Contract

Reported in : AIR1927Mad62; 97Ind.Cas.866

Venkatasubba Rao, J.1. The question to be decided in this appeal is whether the plaintiff is entitled to the return of the advance paid by him in respect of a yarn contract. The contract was entered...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1978

M. Kunjithapatham and ors. Vs. the Thiruvilaiyattam Village Co-operati ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-11-1978

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1979)1MLJ6

ORDERT. Ramaprasada Rao, C.J.1. The interesting question raised in this civil revision petition is whether the proceedings initiated against the petitioners, amongst others, under Section 71 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, is maintainable at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 1999

M/S. Ram Mohan and Co Rep. by Its Proprietrix R. Renuka and Another Vs ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-19-1999

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 100 and 106; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 -- Sections 11 -- Order 43, Rule 1; Registration Act, 1908 -- Sections 17 and 49; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC40; (1999)3MLJ423

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K. Alagiriswamy, Senior Counsel for ;Mr. A. Veerasamy, Advs.

ORDER1. These Second Appeals are directed against a common judgment of the learned District Judge, Coimbatore, in A.S.Nos. 150, 215 and 216 of 1992.2. O.S.No. 1397 of 1987 on the file of the Sub-Court, Coimbatore, was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 25 1993

integral Coach Factory Staff Council and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-25-1993

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Railway Establishment Code, 1951; Constitution of India - Article 309

Reported in : (1994)ILLJ678Mad; (1993)IIMLJ343

Advocate for Appellant : K. Alagiriswami, Adv. for T.K. Rajeswaran, Adv. and ;C.M. Krishnakumar, Adv.

Abdul Hadi, J.1. A decision on a short point would dispose of the above referred to two writ appeals against W.P. No. 16141 of 1991, according to Mr. K. Alagiriswami, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 30 2004

Dove Investments Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. Gujarat Industrial Investme ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-30-2004

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F, 108(1A), 108(1B), 108(1C), 108(1D) and 111A

Reported in : [2005]124CompCas399(Mad); (2005)6CompLJ490(Mad); 2005(1)CTC249; (2005)1MLJ269; [2005]60SCL604(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Alagiriswamy, Sr. Counsel for ;S. Murugan, Adv. for Appellants in CMA No. 3188/2004 and ;P.H. Aravindh Pandian, Adv. for Appellant in C.M.A. No. 3223/2004

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. By consent of all the parties, the Appeals themselves have (been) taken up for disposal. M/s. Dove Investments Private Limited, Mumbai-21; M/s. Max worth Investments Private Limited, Chennai-34; and Mr. P.N. Mohan, partner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial