Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ajoy kumar · Page 1 of about 319 results (0.204 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 22 1961

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Benode Kumar

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-22-1961

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 66, 74 and 113; ;Contract Act - Section 19

Reported in : AIR1962Cal48,65CWN727

Advocate for Appellant : Ajoy Kumar Basu, Adv.

Banerjee, J.1. The plaintiff, who is the respondent, claims to be a business man in stationery and toilet goods. He came to court with the case that, on June 9, 1951, he purchased a Railway Ticket...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 2004

Furkhan Ali Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-25-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 10A, 10A(1) and 33; ;Graduate Medical Education (Amendment) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 6 and 6A

Reported in : 2005(4)KarLJ168

Advocate for Appellant : Ajoy Kumar Patil, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 43056, 43629 and 46207 of 2004, ;Mahesh R. Uppin, Adv. in W.P. No. 43830 of 2004, B.L. Sanjeev Associates in W.P. No. 44724 of 2004, ;C. Jagadish and ;G. Krishnamu

ORDERR. Gururajan, J. 1. All these petitions are filed by students seeking a direction directing the 2nd respondent to allot seats to the petitioners in the 3rd respondent-College.2. In W.P. No. 43830 of 2004 the prayer...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 2011

Bombay Rayon Fashions Ltd. Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-27-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 - Article 20 (4) (1), Section 50(3), 44; Karnataka Stamp (Prevention of Undervaluation of Instruments) Rules, 1977 - Rule 5; E-Stamping Rules, 2009. - Section 31

Advocate for Appellant : Sri Ajoy Kumar Patil, Adv

1. Petitioner in these writ petitions has sought for a declaration that the petitioner is liable to pay stamp duly under Article 20 (4) (I) of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 22 2005

impact Polytechnic and ors. Vs. All India Council for Technical Educat ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-22-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987; Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 10A; Constitution of India - Article 226; Grant of Approval for starting New Technical Institutions, Introduction of Courses or Programmes and Approval of Intake Capacity of Seats for Courses or Programmes Regulations, 1994 - Regulation 10

Reported in : ILR2006KAR548; 2006(1)KarLJ396

Advocate for Appellant : Ajoy Kumar Patil, Adv. in W.P. No. 16315 of 2005 and ;Ujwala Walwadikar, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 24301 and 24550 of 2005

ORDERS. Abdul Nazeer, J.1. In W.P. No. 16315 of 2005-1st petitioner is an educational institution by name 'Impact Polytechnic' (for short 'Institution'), imparting education in Diploma Courses. Petitioners 2 to 11 are the students admitted by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1994

Goodricke Group Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of W.B. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-25-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : West Bengal Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 2 and 3; West Bengal Rural Employment and Production Act, 1976 - Sections 3, 4(2A), 4(3), 4(4) and 4B; Constitution of India - Article 14; Tea Act, 1953 - Sections 16B(1), 16C, 16D and 25(1); West Bengal Primary Education Act, 1953 - Sections 78(2A)

Reported in : 1995(50)ECC138; JT1994(7)SC577; 1994(4)SCALE1138; 1995Supp(1)SCC707; [1994]Supp6SCR120; [1995]98STC32(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. Pal

B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. The validity of the levy of education cess and rural employment cess created by the West Bengal Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 1989 is called in question in these writ petitions preferred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2005

Ram Babu Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-07-2005

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311

Advocate for Appellant : Amit Prakash and Soni Srivastava, Advs.

Chandramauli Kumar Prasad, J.1. This application has been filed for quashing the order as contained in memo dated 10.10.2003 (Annexure-4) whereby the service of the petitioner has been terminated with immediate effect.2. Facts lie in a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 1958

Anowar HussaIn and anr. Vs. Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-27-1958

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Judicial Officer's Protection Act, 1850 - Sections 1; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 156(3), 190, 200, 202 and 204; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 2 and 19

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Choudhuri, Adv. in F.A. No. 14 of 1954, G.K. Talukdar, Adv. and R.K. Goswami, Jr. Govt. Advs. in F.A. No. 18 of 1954

Sarjoo Prosad, C.J.1. These two appeals arise out of the same action for recovery of damages for false imprisonment. First Appeal No. 14 of 1954 has been presented by Anowar Hussain, the defendant No. 3 in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 13 2008

Lakshmi Talukdar @ Lakhsmi Bala Talukdar and ors. Vs. State of Assam a ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-13-2008

Subject : Criminal

A. Hazarika, J.1. Petitioners herein three in number from the same family have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus for a direction to the Respondent No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 1979

Muddada Chayanna Vs. G. Veerabhadrarao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-13-1979

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Judicial Officers Protection Act, 1850 - Sections 1-A; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : AIR1979AP253

Advocate for Appellant : Y. Suryanarayana, Adv.

Amareswari, J.1. This is an appeal against the order of the Subordinate Judge. Srikakulam, dated 15-2-1974 rejecting the plaint filed by the plaintiff.2. The plaintiff is the appellant herein. The suit was instituted against defendants 1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2008

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. General Insurance Dev. Officers Asson. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-03-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : General Insurance (Business Nationalization) Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 16, 16(1), 16(2), 16(3), 16(6), 16(7), 16(8), 17, 17A, 17A(1), 17A(2), 17A(4) and 17A(6); Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Act, 1999; Life Insurance (Business Nationalization) Act, 1956; Insurance Act, 1938; Companies Act; Life Insurance Corporation Act; Banking Companies Act; General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Amendment Ordinance, 1984 - Sections 3; Central Board of Direct Taxes Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21 and 39

Reported in : AIR2008SC2657; 2008(4)SCALE768; (2008)5SCC472; 2008AIRSCW4438

Advocate for Appellant : Vikas Singh, ASG,; Ranjit Kumar,; L.N. Rao and;

Arijit Pasayat, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals are taken up alongwith Transfer Case (Civil) Nos.60-64/2004, 73/2004, 42/2005 and 47/2005. 3. In all these cases the basic issue is the legality of General Insurance (Rationalisation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial