Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ajit singh · Page 1 of about 3,496 results (0.194 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 16 1999

Ajit Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-16-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4), 16(1, 4 and 4A), 142 and 335; Punjab Secretariat Class III Service Rules, 1976 - Rules 7(1) and 9; Civil Secretariat Service, Class II Service Rules, 1963 - Rules 8(2) and 10; Punjab Civil Secretariat(Class I) Rules, 1974; Haryana Education Department(State Service, Group B) Rule, 1980 - Rules 9(3) and 11; State Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 115(7)

Reported in : AIR1999SC3471; JT1999(7)SC153; 2000(1)MPHT1; 1999(II)OLR(SC)401; 1999(5)SCALE556; (1999)7SCC209; [1999]Supp2SCR521; (2000)1UPLBEC195

Advocate for Appellant : C.S. Vaidyanathan, Additional Solicitor General,; Harish N. Salve,;

ORDERM. Jagannadha Rao, J.1. We have before us these three Interlocutory Applications Nos. 1 to 3 filed for 'clarification' by the State of Punjab in Civil Appeal Nos. 3792-94 of 1989 (Ajit Singh Januja and Ors....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2001

Smt. Pushpa Kochar and ors. Vs. the Rajasthan High Court and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-17-2001

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2001(3)WLC269; 2002(3)WLN174

Rajesh Balia, J.1. Through this writ petition, the petitioners, who are six in number challenge the validity of the consolidated seniority list (Annexure/4) dated 28.4.1999 of the Officers of Rajasthan Judicial Service (for short 'R.J.S.) manning...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 1992

Mahendra Pratap Singh (Deceased) and Another Vs. Smt. Padam Kumari Dev ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-22-1992

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 183; Power of Attorney Act, 1882 - Sections 2; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 77 - Order 3, Rule 1 - Order X, Rules 2 and 4 - Order 26, Rules 7, 13 and 20 - Order 32, Rules 1 to 14, 15, 16 and 21 - Order 32A, Rules 1, 2 and 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 109 and 165

Reported in : AIR1993All143

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Sharma, ;P.M. Gupta and ;K.S. Chauhan, Advs.

1. A very ugly situation faces the Court, the High Court, in its original jurisdiction in these cases. Many questions have been flung at the Court. The Court must answer them as they are all questions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 01 2000

M.G. Badappanavar and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-01-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Karnataka Government Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957 - Rules 2, 4 and 4A; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : [2001(88)FLR808]; 2000(8)SCALE124; [2000]Supp5SCR302; (2001)1UPLBEC298

ORDERM. Jagannadha Rao, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 24115-24116 of 1996 (hereinafter called the main batch) are directed against the judgment of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal dated 20-11 -1996 in Application...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 1997

Jagdish Lal and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-07-1997

Subject : Service Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(1), 16, 46, 309 and 335; Haryana Education Department Class III Service Rules, 1974 - Rule 11

Reported in : AIR1997SC2366; JT1997(5)SC387; 1997(4)SCALE202; (1997)6SCC538

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Rohtagi

ORDERK. Ramaswamy, J.1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Counsel on both sides.3. This appeal by special leave arises from the Division Bench Judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court, made on November 5, 1996 in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2009

Ajay Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-04-2009

Subject : Service

Reported in : RLW2009(1)Raj713

K.S. Rathore, J.1. Since all these writ petitions are similar in nature, therefore, the same are being decided by this common order.2. In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3355/2004- Hanuman Singh Bhati and Ors. v. State...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 1997

Sube Singh Bahmani Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-08-1997

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1997)6SCC765

G.N. Ray and; G.B. Pattanaik, JJ.1. It appears to us that a three-Judge Bench of this Court in Ajit Singh Januja v. State of Punjab1 after extensively referring to the decision of this Court in R.K....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 2000

M.G. Badappanavar and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-01-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 4-A, 14, 15 & 16(1); Karnataka Government Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957 - Rules 2, 4

Reported in : 2001(1)KarLJ236

Advocate for Appellant : Sri Rajiv Dhawan, ;Sri Raju Ramachandran and ;Sri M. Rama Jois, Senior Advs., ;Ms. Kiran Suri, ;Sri B.B. Bajentry, ;Sri E.C. Vidya Sagar, ;Sri Satya Mitra, ;Sri Sanjay R. Hegde and ;Sri S.N. B

ORDER1.Leave granted.2. These appeals arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos. 24115 and 24116 of 1996 (hereinafter called the 'main batch') are directed against the judgment of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal dated 20-11-1996 in Application Nos. 2756...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 1990

Union of India Vs. Jyotsna Holdings (P.) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-28-1990

Subject : Company

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections. 5, 8(1), 14, 33(2), 47, 47(1), 50 and 54

Reported in : 1992(38)ECC308

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Desai, Adv

Y.K. Sabharwal, J.1. In this application seeking condensation of delay in filing the appeal, this court is not concerned with the merits of the case except for the limited purpose of deciding the plea of public...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2008

Shiv Nath Prasad Vs. Saran Pal Jeet Singh Tulsi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-10-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 16(4A); Madhya Pradesh Lok Seva (Anusuchit Jatiyon, Anusuchit Jan Jatiyon Aur Anya Pichhade Vargon Ke Liye Arakshan) Adhiniyam, 1994 - Sections 5 and 5A; Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission (Services Promotion Rules, 2002; Madhya Pradesh Lok Seva (Anusuchit Jatiyon, Anusuchit Jan Jatiyon Aur Anya Pichhade Vargon Ke Liye Arakshan) Sanshodhan Adhiniyam, 2002; Madhya Pradesh Civil Service (General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1961; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Department Engineering (Gazzetted Service Recruitment) Rules, 1969

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR992; [2008(116)FLR552]; [2008(1)JCR203(SC)]; JT2008(1)SC630; (2008)1MLJ1202(SC); 2008(1)SCALE250; (2008)3SCC80; 2008(1)LC255(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Krishan Singh Chauhan,; Gyan Mitra,; Chand Kiran,;

A.K. Mathur, J.1. These appeals are directed against the order dated 15th may 2003 passed by the Division Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court in Writ Petition No. 5634 of 1999, whereby Shiv Nath Prasad, appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial