Advanced Search Results

Union of India Vs. Shyama Charan Agarwala and Sons

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : (1996)22BOMLR169

Advocate for Appellant : Sh. Suraj M. Shah and ;Ms. S.I. Shah, Adv., i/b., ;S. Bhattacharya

S.M. Jhunjhunuwala, J.1. By this petition, the petitioners seek to have the Award dated 30th August, 1994 filed in this court and numbered as Award No. 233 of 1994 set aside. 2. On 20th Oct., 1987,...

Ramakant Laxman Sarmalkar Vs. Nowrojee Wadia Maternity Hospital and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28

Reported in : 2002(3)ALLMR322; 2002(5)BomCR139

Advocate for Appellant : Niranini Shetty, Adv.

R.J. Kochar, J.1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 26-4-2000 passed by the Industrial Court in Complaint U.L.P. No. 504 of 1990 dismissing the complaint filed by him under section 28 read with Items...

Union of India Vs. M/S. Ajit Mehta and Associates, Pune and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 8, 10, 16, 17, 20, 30, 31, 33, 35, 41 and 43; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 - Schedule - Articles 119 and 158; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1990Bom45; 1989(3)BomCR535

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Agarwal, Adv.

ORDERSawant, J.1. These five appeals arise out of the decision of the trial Court by which the trial Court has disposed of five suits and five objection petitions.Respondent No. 1 in all the appeals is a...

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Thaly Constructions

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20 and 20(4)

Reported in : 1991(1)BomCR389

Advocate for Appellant : H.R. Bharne, Additional Government Adv.

G.D. Kamat, J.1. This appeal purported to be under section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, challenges the order of the trial Court dated 8th September, 1989, whereby that Court directed appointment of an arbitrator in...

Fertilisers and Chemicals Travancore Ltd. Vs. Rajkumar Lines Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1970)72BOMLR271; 1970MhLJ503

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kotwal

Vaidya, J.1. [His Lordship after stating the facts, proceeded]. In view of these contentions before us, the first question that arises in these two appeals is whether the orders passed by Mr. Justice Mody in the...

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs. Globe Hi Fabs Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 28(3), 31(7) 30, 33 and 34; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; Constitution of India - Article 12 and 14; UNCITRAL Model Law - Schedule - Article 34

Reported in : 2004(3)ARBLR636(Delhi); 116(2005)DLT1

Advocate for Appellant : J.C. Seth, Adv

Vijender Jain, J.C.M.No. 13370/20041. Learned counsel for the appellants wishes to withdraw the application for interim injunction. 2. In view of the submissions made, the application is dismissed as withdrawn.F.A.O.(OS) No. 222/20041. This appeal has been...

Ghanshyam Chatursing Rajpurohit Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Criminal

A.H. Joshi, J. The appellant herein was named as accused in crime No.I-67/2010 of Shirdi police station. After investigation charge sheet was filed and upon committal, charge for offence punishable u/s 302 of the Indian Penal...

M/S. Bindra Builders Vs. I.B.Pl. Group of Companies

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20

Reported in : 2001IIIAD(Delhi)920; 2001(57)DRJ848; 2001(3)RLR323

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.S. Vohra, Adv

ORDERVikramajit Sen, J.1. In the present case the Petitioner had, on 25th March, 1994 issued a letter to the Respondent stating the receipt of a cheque No.173639 for Rs.1,41,696/- would be towards full and final payment...

Union of India Through Secretary, Govt. of India Ministry of Communica ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8 and 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20 - Order 7, Rule 10, Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 1998(3)ALLMR816; 1998(2)BomCR874

Advocate for Appellant : G.V. Tamba, Central Govt. Standing Counsel and ;S.R. Rivenkar, Addl.S.C.

ORDERR.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. This is a revision application against the Order dated 23rd October 1996 passed in Special Civil Suit No. 208/94/A by the Civil Judge, Senior Division at Panaji. By the impugned Order the trial...

PravIn Sankalchand Shah Vs. D.B. Dalal (Official Liquiddator)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 477 and 543

Reported in : [1967]37CompCas317(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Ajit Mehta, Adv.

1. The facts giving rise to the present judge's summons dated 11th June, 1965, taken out by the applicant, Pravin Sankalchand Shah, for vacating the order passed by this court on 2nd March, 1963, directing private...