Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ajit kumar pande · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.066 seconds)

Jan 16 2008

Sattatiya @ Satish Rajanna Kartalla Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-16-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 136; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD(Cri)510; 2008CriLJ1816; JT2008(1)SC434; RLW2008(3)SC2135; 2008(1)SCALE399; 2008AIRSCW1136; AIR2008SC1184; 2008(3)SCC210; (2008)1SCC(Cri)733; 2008(1)Crimes191; 2008(1)LH(SC)449.

Advocate for Appellant : Ajit Kumar Pande, Adv. (A.C.

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Bombay High Court, which upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentence of life imprisonment awarded to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2007

Rama Paswan and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 60, 64 and 91; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 320 and 376; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 311, 313 and 482

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1442; 2007CriLJ2750; [2007(3)JCR131(SC)]; JT2007(9)SC336; RLW2007(2)SC1534; 2007(5)SCALE646; 2007(1)LC635(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Ajit Kumar Pande, Adv

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. Appellants call in question legality of the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Jharkhand High Court dismissing the petition filed by the appellants.3. Background facts in a nutshell...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2004

Raju Pandurang Mahale Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-11-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 292, 302, 323, 340, 342, 354, 376 and 376(2); Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2004SC1677; 2004CriLJ1441; JT2004(2)SC425; 2004(2)SCALE408; (2004)4SCC371; 2004(2)LC876(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Ajit Kumar Pande, Adv

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Appellant calls in question legality of the conviction recorded in terms of Sections 342 and 354 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'the IPC') by the Trial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Aug 09 2004

Prakash Chand Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-09-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 304

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD(Cri)612; 2004(6)SCALE495; (2004)11SCC381

Advocate for Appellant : Ajit Kumar Pande, Adv. (A.C

Arijit Pasayat, J. 1. Leave granted.2. Over a petty matter the appellant is supposed to have committed fratricide. He was found guilty by the Trial Court for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2004

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Farid Khan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-23-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 324

Reported in : AIR2004SC5050; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)977; JT2004(8)SC322; 2005MPLJ241(SC); RLW2004(4)SC588; 2004(8)SCALE139; (2005)9SCC103

Advocate for Appellant : Ajit Kumar Pande and; Pramod Swarup, Advs

K.G. Balakrishnan, J. 1. These appeals are preferred by the State of Uttar Pradesh assailing the acquittal of the three respondents accused of the offences charged against them under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 2009

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and anr. Vs. Dhanurdhar Champatiray

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-11-2009

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(2), 11(4), 11(5), 11(6) and 11(8)

Reported in : 2010(1)AWC917(SC); 2010(I)OLR(SC)541; 2009(14)SCALE545; (2010)1SCC673

Advocate for Appellant : Debasish Moitra and; Ajit Kumar Pande, Advs

Tarun Chatterjee, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals by special leave have been filed against the orders dated 5th of January 2005 in A.R.B.P. Nos. 11, 12, 17, 18 and 28 of 2005 passed by the High...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 2008

Premiya @ Prem Prakash Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-22-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 228A, 354, 375, 376, 376A, 376B, 376C and 376D; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR3060; [2008(4)JCR91(SC)]; RLW2009(1)SC738; 2008(12)SCALE739; 2008(10)SCC81; 2008(4)Crimes126; 2008(6)Supreme596; 2008(5)LH(SC)3473.

Advocate for Appellant : Ajit Kumar Pande, Adv

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant and upholding his conviction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2006

Sada Ram Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-01-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 307; Arms Act - Sections 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : JT2006(7)SC430; 2006(7)SCALE657

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Dateer,; Ajit Kumar Pande and; Chander Kanta Dateer

B.P. Singh, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No. 534-DB of 1996 dated February 8, 2005 whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
Next ›

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.