Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ajit kumar dutta and · Page 1 of about 70 results (0.428 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 24 1962

Ananta Kumar Karan Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-24-1962

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1955 - Section 116; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4, 207A, 208 to 213, 374, 512 and 532; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302

Reported in : AIR1962Cal428

Advocate for Appellant : Ajit Kumar Dutta and ;Jyotirmoyee Nag, Advs.

N.K. Sen, J. 1. Ananta Kumar Karan was tried by the Additional Sessions Judge, 24 Parganas and a jury on a charge under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The jury unanimously found him guilty...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1963

Thandulal Dhanuka Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-02-1963

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167(8), 168, 172, 179, 182 and 184

Reported in : AIR1964Cal490,1964CriLJ536

Advocate for Appellant : Ajit Kumar Dutta, ;Nikhil Chandra Talukdar, ;Anath Bandhu Pal, Advs. (in Cr.R. No. 392 of 1963) and ;Nikhil Chandra Talukdar, Adv. (in Cr.R. No. 393 of 1963)

ORDERAmaresh Roy, J.1. These two Revision Cases have been heard together as they arise out of the same case now pending in the Court of the Chief Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta, and raise same point regarding the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 1961

Arun Kumar Banerjee and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-18-1961

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 154, 162, 297 and 374; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 302; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8, 21, 45 and 157

Reported in : AIR1962Cal504

Advocate for Appellant : Ajit Kumar Dutta and ;Dilip Kumar Dutta, Advs.

P.B. Mukharji, J. 1. The two appellants were convicted of murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to death by the Additional Sessions Judge, Alipore, on the majority verdict of the jury...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 10 1970

Nathmull Poddar Vs. Salil Kumar Chakraborty

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-10-1970

Subject : Criminal

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 26; ;General and Special Acts; ;Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 40, 85 and 86; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 403, 405 and 406

Reported in : AIR1971Cal93,1971CriLJ361,74CWN792

Advocate for Appellant : Ajit Kumar Dutta and ;Amiya Kumar Chakraborty, Advs.

ORDERN.C. Talukdar, J.1. This Rule is at the instance of the accused-petitioner Nathmull Poddar, for quashing proceedings under Sections 406/403, I.P.C., being Case No. C-1583 of 1969, pending in the court of the learned Chief Presidency...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 09 1959

Kirtibash Das and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-09-1959

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 233, 297 and 537; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 304

Reported in : AIR1960Cal269,1960CriLJ469,64CWN282

Advocate for Appellant : Ajit Kumar Dutta, Adv.

Mitter, J.1. The appellants were tried by a learned Assistant Sessions Judge of Midnapore with the aid of a Jury, Appellant No. 1 was charged under Ss. 304 and 326 or the Indian Penal Code. Appellants...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 1966

Kartick Chandra Saha Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-15-1966

Subject : Civil

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 12A; ;Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 1964; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 173

Reported in : AIR1968Cal127,1968CriLJ311

Advocate for Appellant : Ajit Kumar Dutta and ;Bimal Chandra Chatterjee, Advs.

ORDERT.P. Mukherji, J. 1. The petitioner who is an accused in a case under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act of 1955 obtained this Rule against the order of the Magistrate forwarding the records of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 15 1955

Sreenath Malakar and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-15-1955

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 260(1); ;Bengal Excise Act, 1909 - Sections 46 and 63

Reported in : AIR1955Cal552,1955CriLJ1354,61CWN686

Advocate for Appellant : Ajit Kumar Dutta, Adv.

J.P. Mitter, J.1. This is a petition for revision of an order of conviction and sentence under Section 46, Bengal Excise Act (Act V of 1909) for unlawful possession of a quantity of 'charas', an intoxicant....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2004

Lakakula Sujatha Vs. Thummu Manemma and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-22-2004

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 20, Rule 6A

Reported in : 2004(3)ALD215; 2004(3)ALT298

Advocate for Appellant : Bankatlal Mandhani, Adv.

T.Ch. Surya Rao, J.1.This second appeal is directed against the order dated 6-6-2002 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Warangal in A.S.SR. No. 4423 of 2002.2. The unsuccessful appellant who sought to file the appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2004

Bhutka Rabidas Vs. Saraswati Devi

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-22-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 and 103

Reported in : [2004(3)JCR615(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Manjul Prasad and; R.K. Sinha, Advs.

Vishnudeo Narayan, J.1. This appeal at the instance of the plaintiff-appellant has been preferred against the impugned judgment of reversal and decree dated 9.1.1990 and 17.1.1990 respectively passed in Title Appeal No. 41 of 1988 by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 1973

Pawan Kumar Gupta Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-01-1973

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1973CriLJ1368

ORDERN.C. Talukdar, J.1. This Rule is at the instance of the claimant-petitioner, Pawan Kumar Gupta, being directed against an order dated 6-12-1972 passed by Shri I,. N. Roy, Senior Municipal Magistrate, Calcutta, in Misc. Case No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial