Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ajay ukas · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.020 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 31 1999

Surajmal Vs. Rukminibai

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-31-1999

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 23(A) and 25

Reported in : AIR2000MP48; I(2000)DMC582; 2000(1)MPLJ19

Advocate for Appellant : Ajay Ukas, Adv.

J.G. Chitre, J. 1. Shri Ajay Ukas, counsel for the appellant. The respondent is absent. None is present for her. 2. By this appeal the appellant is assailing correctness, propriety and legality of the order which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2001

Union of India Vs. Chhabhaiya and Co. and ors. Narayan Timbers and ors ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-24-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]253ITR201(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : R. L. Jain, for the Revenue Ajay Ukas and S. M. Dagaonkar, for the Assessee

N. K. Jain, J. The judgments impugned in these appeals filed under section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, are rendered by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offence), Indore, in Criminal Cases Nos....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2001

Union of India Vs. Narayan Timbers

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-24-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]121TAXMAN406(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : R.L. Jain, for the Revenue Ajay Ukas and S.M. Dagaonkar, for the Assessee

The judgments impugned in these appeals filed under section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 are rendered by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offence), Indore, in Criminal Case Nos. 36 of 1988, 39 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 12 1996

Jaggi @ Jagdish S/O Ramprasad Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-12-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 9 and 10

Reported in : 1997(2)MPLJ433

Advocate for Appellant : S.L. Ukas and ;Ajay Ukas, Advs.

J.G. Chitre, J.1. The petitioner is assailing correctness, propriety and legality of the order of conviction and sentence recorded against him by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhar, in the matter of Cr. C. No. 2154/82.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial