Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ajay sharma · Page 1 of about 319 results (0.070 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 01 2006

Oriental Insurance Company Vs. Smt. Sheela Devi and Smt. Durga Devi an ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : May-01-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bar Council of India Rules, 1975 - Rule 39; Advocates Act, 1965 - Section 49(C); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3, Rules 3, 4, 4(1) and 4(2) - Sections 144 and 152; ;Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 - Rules 1 to 4

Reported in : AIR2006HP94,2006(1)ShimLC454

Advocate for Appellant : Lalit Shrama,; Ajay Sharma and; Salochna Kaundal and

Deepak Gupta, J.1. The main point raised in these cases is whether a fresh Counsel can appear in a matter without obtaining consent from the Counsel previously engaged and appearing in the matter and without determining...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2006

Hari Chand Vs. Jaishi Ram and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : May-24-2006

Subject : Contract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 16 and 21

Reported in : 2006(2)ShimLC289

Advocate for Appellant : Ajay Sharma, Adv.

Deepak Gupta, J. 1. This appeal raises a short question of law with regard to the jurisdiction of the trial Court, who heard the suit.2. The facts relevant for the decision of the present appeal are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 1999

Balwinder Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-23-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 25F

Reported in : (1999)IILLJ1116HP

Advocate for Appellant : Ajay Sharma, Adv.

D. Raju, C. J. 1. The above writ petition has been filed seeking for the issue of a writ to set aside the memo, dated August 22, 1992, filed as Annexure P-5, whereunder the services of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 23 2006

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Sat Pal

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : May-23-2006

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ499

Advocate for Appellant : Ajay Sharma, CGSC in CIMA No. 42/2004 and; D.S. Saini, Adv. in Cross Appeal (C) No. 9/2005

J.P. Singh, J.1. Union of India, IG Frontier, Headquarter, BSF, Paloura Camp, Jammu, and Madan Lal, Head Constable, have filed this appeal to question award dated 07-11-2003 in claim petition No. 642(Claim) titled Sat Pal v....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2011

Dalel Singh Vs. Dharam Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : May-04-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (C.P.C) - Orders 21, 41 Rule 32, 5

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv.

1. By means of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed that the application under Order XXI, Rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the decree...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2011

Suresh Kumar and Yash Pal Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : May-26-2011

Subject : Property

Acts : The Central Act; The H.P.Public Premises and Land Act 1971; Constitution of India - Article 227

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv.

1. This petition is directed against the order of the Divisional Commissioner, Kangra at Dharamshala whereby he has dismissed the appeal filed by Shri Suresh Kumar and upheld the order of eviction passed by the Collector...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2003

Anju Misra (Smt.) Vs. General Manager, Kanpur Jal Sansthan

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-26-2003

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependent of Government Servant Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1974; Constitution of India - Article 14 and 16

Reported in : (2004)1UPLBEC201

Advocate for Appellant : Ajay Sharma and ;Durga Tiwari, Advs.

R.B. Misra, J.1. In the present writ petition the petitioner has sought to quash the order dated 30.3.1994 (Annexure-3 to the writ petition), whereby the General Manager, Kanpur Jal Sansthan, Kanpur, has rejected the application of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2005

Smt. Urmila Devi Vs. District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-26-2005

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 12(3) and 18

Reported in : 2006(2)AWC1123

Advocate for Appellant : Vijai Prakash, ;Ajay Sharma, ;R.N. Singh and ;S.N. Singh, Advs.

Vikram Nath, J. 1. This writ petition filed by the landlady is directed against the judgment and order dated 23.4.1987, 20.4.1987 and 10.12.1985, passed by respondent Nos. 1 and 2 whereby the application of the landlady...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 2000

Saphi Mohammad Vs. Ram Jiyawan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-24-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 18, Rule 3A

Reported in : 2000(4)MPHT454

Advocate for Appellant : Ajay Sharma, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') the plaintiff petitioner has called in question the legal validity of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2003

AmIn Chand and ors. Vs. Bhagtu and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-27-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 100 - Order 8, Rule 5; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34 and 38; ;Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Reforms Act, 1974 - Sections 3, 90 and 91

Reported in : AIR2003HP161

Advocate for Appellant : Ajay Sharma, Adv.

ORDERArun Kumar Goel, J.1. This appeal was admitted on 17-12-1996 on the following substantial questions of law :1. Whether the learned Courts below appreciated the provisions of law applicable, pleadings of the parties and evidence adduced...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial