Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ajay kumar ambastha · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.022 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 24 2006

Paglu Yadav Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-24-2006

Subject : Criminal

1. Sole appellant was put on trial for offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Additional Sessions; Judge IVth, Begusarai by judgment dated 25th of January, 2002...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 1999

Suniram Kisku Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Dec-01-1999

Subject : Criminal

D.P.S. Choudhary, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 28th of September, 1993 passed by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Dumka (Santhal Pargana) in Sessions Case No. 503 of 1990 convicting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2005

Vijay Kumar Manmouji Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jan-19-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 - Sections 18(1) and 18(2)

Advocate for Appellant : Promod Mishra and Arun Kumar, Advs.Sanjeev Nikesh, Adv.

R.S. Garg, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and Shri Ajay Kumar Ambastha, learned counsel for the intervener (Up-Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat).2. The facts necessary for disposal of the present...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 09 2006

Mani Roy Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-09-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bihar Control of Crimes Act, 1981 - Sections 12(2), 17, 19, 21(1) and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 22(5)

Advocate for Appellant : Ajay Kumar Ambastha, Subhash Kumar Mishra and Vijay Kumar Sahay, Advs.

1. A proceeding under the provisions of the Bihar Control of Crimes Act, 1981, hereinafter referred to as 'Act 1981', was initiated against the petitioner. The order of detention was passed under Section 12(2) of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial