Advanced Search Results

P.V. Kapoor and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Criminal Procedre Code, 1973 - Sections 130, 131, 132 and 173; Delhi Police Act; Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1992CriLJ128; 1991(21)DRJ285; 1991RLR513

B.N. Kirpal, J. (1) Two lawyers of this court have filed this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, alleging that in the police firing on a crowd...

Ccn Entertainment (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Msm Discovery India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : For Petitioner: Ms. Neha Jain, Vineet Bhagat, Advocates. For Respondent: Mr. Aditya Narain, Advocate.

S.B. Sinha The petitioner herein is a Multi Service Operator. Respondent is a content aggregator of the channels of several broadcasters. The parties hereto entered into an affiliation agreement on or about 13.09.2008. The said affiliation...

Km. Rohini Singh Vs. Visitor, B.H.U., President of India and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Banaras Hindu University Act, 1915 - Sections 18

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC387

Advocate for Appellant : Aditya Narain, Adv.

O.P. Garg, J.1. The petitioner Km. Rohini Singh appeared in the entrance test for admission to M.Ed. course 1997-98 conducted by Banaras Hindu University (for short 'B.H.U.'). On 8.9.1997 a letter was received by her from...

M/S Steel City Central Network Vs. Msm Discovery Private Limited

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : Miscellaneous

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: Mr.Vibhav Srivastava, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr.Aditya Narain, Advocate.

S. B. Sinha The petitioner is a multi system operator. The respondent is a content aggregator. It carries on business as a distribution agent of same broadcasters under the name of ‘One Alliance’. The parties hereto,...

Mohammad YasIn and Another Vs. Mohammad YasIn and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 and 115 - Order 21, Rule 97; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1992All55

Advocate for Appellant : Aditya Narain, Adv.

ORDER1. Petitioners were the plaintiffs in a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale.2. Mohd. Bashir and Abdul Ghafoor were the predecessor in interest of respondents Nos. 1 to 13. They were the owners...

Country Club Ltd. and Another Vs. K. Dhamodhar

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 21(b)

Reported in : 2012(2)CPJ36; 2012(2)CPR452

Advocate for Appellant : Aditya Narain; Ms.Astha Tyagi; Ms.Suchi Singh; Varun Kumar, Advs.

R.C. Jain, Presiding Member:Oral:1. Challenge in these proceedings is to the order dated 14.6.2011 passed by the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short ‘State Commission’) in appeal No. 4506/2010. The appeal before the State...

Ganesh Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Advocate for Appellant : Aditya Narain Singh and Kundar Kumar Sinha, Advs. in CWJC No. 15417/04 and Chakradhari Sharan Singh, Shantanu Kumar, Ram Kishore Singh and Chendra Prakash Singh, Advs. in CWJC No. 9791/04

Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.1. Both these writ applications involve certain common questions and, therefore, with the consent of the parties, they have been heard together.2. Heard Mr. Aditya Narain Singh and Mr. Chakrdhari Sharan Singh, learned...

M/S. Variety Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. Versus M/S. Msm Discovery Pvt. Lt ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : FOR THE PETITIONERS: BALAJI SRINIVASAN, ADVOCATE. FOR THE RESPONDENT: ADITYA NARAIN, ADVOCATE.

1. In this petition directions were issued vide our Order dated 1.10.2009 that the parties should meet on 23.10.2009 in the office of the respondent for settling their dispute and differences. The meeting, as directed, was...

State of U.P. Vs. Ballabh Das and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 225 and 302

Reported in : AIR1985SC1384; 1985CriLJ2009; 1985(2)SCALE1361; (1985)3SCC703; 1985(17)LC906(SC)

S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J.1. These appeals by special leave arise out of a judgment dated December 19, 1975 of the Allahabad High Court by which the High Court reversed the conviction and sentence of the...

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Vibhu Bakhru, J. 1. These petitions have been filed by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ), a company incorporated under the Laws of Sweden (hereafter also referred to as 'Ericsson'), inter alia, impugning orders dated 12th November, 2013...