Advanced Search Results
The Archidiocese of Goa, Daman and Dui, Through Its Constituted Attorn ...
Mumbai
Jul-17-2006
Property
Daman (Abolition of Proprietorship of Villages) Regulations, 1962
2006(5)BomCR881
Aditya Chitale, Adv.
J.H. Bhatia, J.1. The petition is filed by the Archidiocese of Goa, Daman and Diu and the dispute pertains to certain lands situated in two villages of Daman. The properties including agricultural and non-agricultural lands of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKamgar Utkarsha Sabha Vs. Bharatiya Kamgar Karmachari Mahasangh and Ot ...
Mumbai
Jan-13-1998
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour practices Act, 1971 - Sections 11 and 13
1998(2)ALLMR21; 1998(2)BomCR411; [1998(79)FLR619]; 1998(1)MhLj854
E.P. Bharucha, S.A. and ;Kiran Bapat, Adv.
ORDERR.M. Lodha, J.1. Rule. Returnable forthwith. Mr. Aditya Chitale appears for respondent No. 1 and waives service. Mr. S.M. Naik appears for respondent No. 2 and waives service on his behalf. Respondent Nos. 3 and 4...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRuby Coach Builders Limited Vs. Shri P.S. Ghose, Member, Industrial Co ...
Mumbai
Jan-29-2008
Labour and Industrial
Companies Act, 1956; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practice Act, 1971; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 12(3), 18, 18(3), 20 and 28; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 3, 4 and 4(5); Payment of Bonus Act, 1965
[2008(117)FLR143]; 2008(4)MhLj270
Aditya Chitale, Adv.
B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. The Petitioner is a private limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 with its registered office at Mumbai, which is aggrieved by the Judgment and order dated 29-9-1995 rendered by the Learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kumari Meena Mohanlal Merchant Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
Jun-08-1990
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 340
AIR1991Bom74; 1990(3)BomCR151
K.K. Singhvi and ;S.N. Singhvi, ;Aditya Chitale and ;B.N. Singhvi, Advs.
ORDER1. The petitioner after passing her Higher Secondary School Examination (XII Standard) in June, 1984 applied for admission for medical course under a reserved seat for other backward class on the ground that she belonged to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Union Carbide (India) Ltd. Vs. Ramesh Kumbla and Others
Mumbai
Dec-15-1998
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1985 - Sections 2; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 3(5), 28 and 44; Constitution of India - Article 227; Trade Union Act, 1926; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972
1999(1)ALLMR540; 1999(1)BomCR705; 1999(2)MhLj63
P.K. Rele, ;T.S. Shetty and ;Aditya Chitale, Advs.
ORDERA.V. Savant, J.1. Heard both the learned Counsel; Shri Rele for the petitioner employer and Shri S.M. Dharap for respondent No. 1 complainant, who claims to be a workman.2. The petition is by the employer Union...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Lever Limited Vs. Municipal Corporation of Gr. Bombay and an ...
Mumbai
Feb-25-2005
Other Taxes
Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888; Octroi Rules, 1965 - Rules 24 to 30; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 265
2005(191)ELT148(Bom)
Aditya Chitale and ;Kusum Joshi, Advs., i/b., M & M Legal Venture
D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. Hindustan Lever Limited manufactures soaps and detergents in its factory at Sewri at Mumbai. The company uses a raw material by the name of Sulphuric Acid which is an Organic Surface Active Agent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Razia Bano Vs. Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika
Mumbai
Feb-18-2008
Property
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act - Sections 52(1), 55, 55(1), 136, 136(1) and 149; Bombay Shops And Establishments Act, 1948
2008(5)BomCR453
Aditya Chitale, Adv.
J.H. Bhatia, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Parties.2. The appellant before this Court is the original plaintiff. According to the appellant, she had purchased the suit premises being suit shop No. 1 from one...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Rashid Khan Vs. Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika
Mumbai
Feb-18-2008
Property
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act - Sections 55, 55(1), 52(2), 136, 136(1) and 149; Bombay Shops And Establishments Act, 1948
(2008)110BOMLR711; 2008(3)MhLj842
Aditya Chitale, Adv.
J.H. Bhatia, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Parties.2. The appellant before this Court is the original plaintiff. According to the appellant, he had purchased the suit premises being suit shop No. 3 from one...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Shameem Shah Through Her Constituted Attorney Mr. Abdul Rehman Kh ...
Mumbai
Feb-18-2008
Property
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act - Sections 52(1), 55, 55(1), 136, 136(1) and 149; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948
2008(4)MhLj699
Aditya Chitale, Adv.
J.H. Bhatia, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Parties. 2. The appellant before this Court is the original plaintiff. According to the appellant, she had purchased the suit premises being suit shop No. 4 from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Rehman S/O. Abdul Karim Khan Vs. Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika
Mumbai
Feb-18-2008
Property
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act - Sections 52(1), 55, 55(1), 136, 136(1) and 149; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948
2008(4)MhLj198
Aditya Chitale, Adv.
J.H. Bhatia, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Parties. 2. The appellant before this Court is the original plaintiff. According to the appellant, he had purchased the suit premises being suit shop No. 2 from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »