Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: additional advocate general · Page 1 of about 6,590 results (1.010 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 23 2005

Bharathidasan University, Represented by Its Registrar-in-charge and o ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-23-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 - Sections 3, 9, 12(a), 14, 14(4), 14(6), 15, 17, 18, 20 and 20(3); All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 10 and 10(1); Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 10A; National Council for Teacher Education Regulations, 2002 - Regulation 6; Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 4(1) and 4(2); Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Rules, 1976 - Rule 2(b); National Council for Teacher Education Rules, 1997; National Council for Teacher Education Regulations, 2002; Madras University Act, 1923 - Sections 5(5); Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Act, 1993; Andhra Pradesh Commissionerate of Higher Education Act, 1986; Constitution of India - Article 254

Reported in : AIR2005Mad377; 2005(2)CTC182

Advocate for Appellant : P. Subbaya, Adv. assisted by ;C.K. Chandrasekaran, Adv. in W.A. Nos. 4202 and 4205/2004, ;R. Muthukumarasamy, Additional Advocate General assisted by ;V. Karthikeyan, Additional Government Pleader in

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. Higher Education Department of State of Tamil Nadu, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirapalli, aggrieved by the common order of the learned Single Judge dated 25.11.2004, made in W. P. No. 27030/2004, etc., batch, directing the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2001

Govt. of A.P. Vs. C. Prakash Goud and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-10-2001

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 40, 226, 243-D, 243-K, 243-K(3), 243-P, 243-R, 243-S, 243-T, 243-T(1), 243T(6), 243U, 243-U(1), 243-V, 243ZA and 243-ZF; Constitution (Seventy Fourth Amendment) Act, 1992; Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 - Sections 5(2) and 585; Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1994 - Sections 6; Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporation (Reservation of Seats) Rules, 1995 - Rule 10

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD339; 2001(5)ALT723

Advocate for Appellant : Additional Advocate-General

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J. 1. Government of Andhra Pradesh in Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department is the appellant in this letters patent appeal, filed against the judgment of the teamed single Judge dated 31-7-2000 in Writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2000

Syed Mehdi Ispahani Vs. Shakeel Ur-rehman

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-25-2000

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 -- Sections 14 (1)

Reported in : 2000(4)CTC585

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. T.R. Rajagopalan, Additional Advocate General for ;Mr. R. Balachandar, Adv.

ORDER1. The landlord of a building in the city of Madras is the revision petitioner. The respondent in this revision is the tenant. The landlord's petition for evicting the tenant on the ground of demolition and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 09 2011

State of Karnataka, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Department of Edu ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-09-2011

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellants: K.M. Nataraj, Additional Advocate General, B. Veerappa, Additional Government Advocate. For the Respondent: R1 - K.R. Bhavani Shankar and K.B. Muralidhar, C.R. Gopalaswamy, V. Lakshminarayana, S.M. Chandrashekar, Advocates.

(Prayer: These Writ Appeals are filed under Section-4 of the Karnataka High court Act praying to set aside the order passed in Writ Petition Nos.13449-453/2011, 13454/2011, c/w. 19712-718/2011, 20777/2011, 17650-652/2011, 17661-665/2011, 14269-270/2011, 17667/2011, 17726/2011, 17862-863/2011, 17874-876/2011,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1998

P. Senniappan and Others Vs. Kannammal and 2 Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-25-1998

Subject : tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 -- Sections 10(2 and 3); Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 -- Sections 13(1); Transfer of Property Act Sections 105

Reported in : 1998(1)CTC537; (1998)IIMLJ416

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.T.R. Rajagopalan,;Additional Advocate General for Mr.N. Damodaran

ORDER1. The landlords/petitioners aggrieved against the order in appeal, have filed the above revision.2. The petitioners filed R.C.O.P.No.37 of 1989 on the file of the learned Rent Controller/District Munsif, Erode for eviction of the respondents/tenants under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 1990

Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-20-1990

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 32 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Sections 24, 25 and 321; Administrative Law

Reported in : AIR1991SC537; JT1990(4)SC211; (1991)1SCC212; [1990]Supp1SCR625; 1991(1)LC645(SC); (1990)2UPLBEC1174; MANU/SC/0504/1991

J.S. Verma, J.1. This judgment disposes of a bunch of maters comprising of some writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India and special leave petitions under Article 136 of the Constitution of India,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 1998

Vijay Shankar Mishra Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-17-1998

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; Terrorism and Destructive Activities (Prevention) Act; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 241(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 314; Income Tax Act - Sections 269UD and 276A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16(1), 141, 162, 226, 309, 310, 311, 311(2) and 313; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 5, 13(1)(E) and 13(2); Contempt of Courts Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 24, 24(4), 34 and 321; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(7); Uttar Pradesh State Law Officers Rules, 1942 - Rules 2, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 10, 13 and 14; Uttar Pradesh Crown Law Officers Rules, 1942; Uttar Pradesh Forest Service Rules, 1952 - Rule 27; Audi Alt

Reported in : 1999CriLJ521

Advocate for Appellant : W.H. Khan, Adv.

S.H.A. Raza, J.1. The fate of this writ petition hinges on the upright on the following questions :1. Whether the duties of the public prosecutor/Government Advocate are statutory in nature? If so, its effect?2. Whether the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2001

Om Prakash Joshi, Advocate and ors Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-06-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 24, 24(1), 24(4), 24(8), 35 and 321; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(3), 14, 16, 16(1), 124(2), 126, 162, 163, 165, 165(2), 165(3), 216, 217, 217(1), 217(2), 222, 222(1), 226, 319, 361(1), 367 and 368 ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(7) - Order 3, Rule 4(2) and Rule 4(6); General Clauses Act - Sections 13; Advocates Act, 1961 ;

Reported in : AIR2002Raj33; 2001(3)WLC199; 2001(3)WLN632

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Bhandari, Adv.

Lakshmanan, C.J. (1). The petitioners in the instant writ petition are the practicing advocates at Jodhpur. They filed the writ petition with the followingprayers:-'It is, therefore, prayed that a writ, direction or order or in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 2003

Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors. Vs. Pushpindar Kaur

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-15-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Bar Council of India Rules - Rule 49

Reported in : AIR2004AP41; 2003(6)ALD214; 2003(6)ALT30

Advocate for Appellant : Additional Adv. General

B. Sudershan Reddy, J. 1. A distinguished member of the legal fraternity invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in W.P. No. 18610 of 2002 challenging the legality...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2006

State of Assam and ors. Vs. Rimki BuragohaIn and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Dec-06-2006

Subject : Service

1. This batch of writ appeals, heard analogously, is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.12.2005 disposing of 222 writ petitions filed challenging the legality and validity of selection of constables in the police department...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial