Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: abdul rashid · Page 1 of about 1,087 results (0.299 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 09 2001

Shri Jayantilal Modi and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-09-2001

Subject : Criminal Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 42, 42(1), (2) and 43

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)601; 2001BomCR(Cri)908; (2001)3BOMLR385; 2002(81)ECC33; 2001(2)MhLj615

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Yogesh Yagnik, ;Mr. Jayesh Yagnik, ;Ganesh Gole, ;Ms. Q.M.N. Ziaee, ;Mr. A.P. Mundergi, Advs. and ;M/s. Ayaz Khan

Vishnu Sahai. J.1. On 14th July. 2000, while S. A. Bobde, J. was hearing Criminal Appeal Nos. 622 of 1994, 643 of 1994, 649 of 1994 and 82 of 1995, two conflicting decisions of this Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 1980

Mohd. Ramzani Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-30-1980

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 96 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Evidence Act - Sections 105

Reported in : AIR1980SC1341; 1980CriLJ1010; 1980Supp(1)SCC215; 1980(Supp)SCC215; 1980(12)LC541(SC)

R.S. Sarkaria, J.1. This appeal is directed against a judgment, dated December 2, 1978, of the High Court of Delhi, maintaining the conviction of Mohd. Ramzani, appellant under Section 302, Penal Code, with a sentence of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2000

Hardeep Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-14-2000

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotrophic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 15, 42, 42(1), 42(2) and 43; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2001CriLJ593; 2000(3)WLC610

Advocate for Appellant : Kulwant Singh, Adv.

Sunil Kumar Garg, J.1. The abovenamed accused-appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment and order dated 11-9-1996 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS cases, Sri Ganganagar in Sessions case No. 9/93 by which he...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 29 2007

Narendra S/O Gotu Pardesi Vs. Mayor, Dhule Municipal Corporation,

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-29-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 19(1)(AA) and 19IAA; Municipal Corporations Act; Maharashtra Local Authorities (Members' Disqualification) Rules, 1987 - Rule 2(B1)

Reported in : AIR2007Bom195; 2007(5)ALLMR52; 2007(5)BomCR674; (2007)109BOMLR1402; 2007(6)MhLj216

Advocate for Appellant : V.J. Dixit, Sr. Adv. h/f. ;S.V. Natu, Adv.

S.J. Vazifdar, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable and heard forthwith.By an order dated 12.1.2007 the parties were put to notice that the petition was likely to be decided finally at the stage of admission. With...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 2009

Ghulam Rasool Lone Vs. State of J and K and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-16-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 136 and 226

Reported in : JT2009(13)SC422; 2009(3)SLJ211(SC); 2009(8)LC3740(SC):2009AIRSCW5260:2009(4)LHSC2572

Advocate for Appellant : Dinesh Kumar Garg,; B.S. Billowary and; Bheem Pratap Singh

ORDERS.B. Sinha, J.1. One Hamiddulah Dar was an Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police. He was granted promotion to the post of Sub-Inspector illegally upon relaxing the prescribed Rules in the year 1987. Seven persons said to be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 1999

Asgari Begam (Smt.) and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-23-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 3

Reported in : [2000(85)FLR860]; (2000)IIILLJ1249MP

S.C. Pandey, J. 1. This is an appeal filed by the appellants/applicants under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (henceforth the Act) against the Award dated December 30, 1997 passed by the Commissioner for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2015

Rajesh V. Choudhary Vs. Kshitij Rajiv Torka and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-15-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Purohit

1. An award dated 7.1.2010 passed by Mr.Justice S.M.Jhunjhunwala (retired) is sought to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (the said Act). Though it is not stated specifically in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 1962

Bapurao Vs. Waman and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-29-1962

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act, 1958 - Sections 6, 36, 36(1), 36(2), 38(3) and 39(1); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 113; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2; Bombay Vidarbha Region Agricultural Tenants (Protection from Eviction and Amendment of Tenancy Laws) Ordinance, 1957; Bombay Vidarbha Region Agricultural Tenants (Protection from Eviction and Amendment of Tenancy Laws) Act, 1957

Reported in : AIR1963Bom179; (1962)64BOMLR541; ILR1963Bom629

Advocate for Appellant : M.M. Qazi, Adv.

Shah, J.1. This is an application filed by a tenant against the landlord-respondents challenging the order passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in revision against the order passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer who, in his turn,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1941

Ganapa Rama Hegde Vs. Timmaya Narayan Hegde

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-01-1941

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1942)44BOMLR111

Broomfield, J.1. The facts are stated in the judgments of the lower Courts. The question for decision in this second appeal reduced to its essentials may be stated in this way. A mortgages property to B...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 1943

Ambaram Popat Vankar Vs. Budhalal Mahasukram Shah

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-15-1943

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1943Bom443; (1943)45BOMLR795

Jonh Beaumont, C.J.1. This is an appeal under the Letters Patent against an order made by Mr. Justice Wassoodew in second appeal, and it raises the question, whether under the Indian Easements Act a lessee can...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial