Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a vijay narayanan · Page 1 of about 45 results (0.054 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 16 2011

V.Bhaskaran Vs. the Special Director of Enforcement and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-16-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 61(2)(ii), 8(1), 9(1)(a); Foreign Exchange Management Act - Section 49(3); Constitution of India - Article 20(3)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.V.Vijaynarayanan, Adv.

The appellant was issued with an 'opportunity notice' contemplated under Section 61(2)(ii) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as FERA) by the third respondent, alleging that he contravened the provisions of FERA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2009

Dharmalingam, Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Secretary t ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-05-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4(1), 6, 6(3), 9, 16, 16A, 16B, 17A, 23(1A), 23(2), 39 and 48B; Tamil Nadu Housing Board Act, 1961 - Sections 162; City Improvement Trust Act, 1950; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 - Sections 9, 9B, 17(2), 18, 20, 36 and 40; MRTP Act - Sections 126; Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1996; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 31, 162 and 300A

Reported in : (2009)6MLJ757

Advocate for Appellant : A. Vijay Narayanan, SC for R. Syed Mustafa, Adv. in Writ Petition Nos. 45821 to 45824 of 2006 and ;K.M. Vijayan, SC for R. Syed Mustafa, Adv. in Writ Petition Nos. 45825 to 45828 of 2006

ORDERS. Nagamuthu, J.1. The lands belonging to the petitioners comprised in various survey numbers at Madhavaram village, Ambattur Taluk, Chengalput District were acquired by the Tamil Nadu Government for the purpose of organising a truck and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2012

Mohamed Fazal. Vs. K.S.Palanisamy

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-10-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : State Finance Corporation Act - Section 29; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 14

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Vijay Narayanan, Adv.

Writ Appeal preferred under clause 15 of the Letters Patent as against the order of the learned single Judge dated 16.9.2011 made in W.P.No.7440 of 2011.JUDGMENTELIPE DHARMA RAO, J.1. One B.Gowdappa, Proprietor of M/s.Sree Anand Mansion...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 30 2012

R.Gopal. Vs. the Secretary to Government and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-30-2012

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules - Rule 17(e), 9-A, 8; Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 120(B); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1)(c) (d), 13(2),15; Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 - Rule 21,; Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.N.Vijay Narayanan, Adv.

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order issued by the 1st respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 1992

S. Prasanna Vs. the Senior Divisional Manager, Life Insurance Corporat ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-29-1992

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Life Insurance Corporation of India Act, 1956 - Sections 49; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 226 and 300-A; Life Insurance Corporation of India (Agents) Regulations, 1972 - Regulations 8, 16, 19 and 20; Life Insurance Corporation of India (Agents) Rules, 1972 - Rules 8(2), 16, 16(1) and 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1993Mad150

Advocate for Appellant : Vijay Narayanan, Adv.

ORDER1. The prayer in the above writ petition is as follows:'.....to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus or any other appropriate writ, Order or direction, calling for the records of the respondent in Proceedings No. MD/Sect1/...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2008

Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissione ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-08-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 6 and 7A; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10A, 12(3), 18(1) and 18(3); Madras Industrial Disputes Rules - Rule 25(1)

Reported in : [2008(119)FLR635]; (2009)ILLJ257Mad

Advocate for Appellant : Vijay Narayanan, Sr. Counsel for ;R. Parthiban, Adv.

K. Raviraja Pandian, J.1. In this appeal, the appellant Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited assailed the order of the Writ Court dated June 14, 2002 made in W.P. No. 2467/1990, wherein and whereby the Writ Court dismissed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2012

Chemplast Sanmar Limited. Vs. the Chairman and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-23-2012

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 2(51); Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004 - Regulation 2(l); Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Vijay Narayanan, Adv.

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent in its Lr.No.SE/CEDC/CUD/DFC/AO/R/AS/RCS/A4/F.ACCD/12 dated 18.5.2012 with respect to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 1998

Kothari Industrial Corporation Ltd. Rep. by Its Company Secretary Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-16-1998

Subject : Miscellaneous

Acts : Textiles (Consumer Protection) Regulation 1988 -- Clause 6(5); Textile Control Order -- Clauses 17(1)(2), 21(1)(2) and 25(1)

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC314

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Vijay Narayanan, Adv.

ORDER1. The appeal is against the order of the learned single Judge, dated 11.1.1999, passed in W.P.No. 8178 of 1991.2. The appellant herein had filed in W.P.No. 8178 of 1991, challenging the proceedings of the 2nd...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2008

Lakshmi Shankar Mills (P) Ltd., Vs. the Authorised Officer/Chief Manag ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-15-2008

Subject : Banking

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 13, 17 and 17(4); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19(12); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 69 and 69A; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 36; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22; ;State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 31; NPA Act; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI) - Sections 13, 13(2), 13(4), 15, 17, 17A, 17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 17(4), 17(6), 17(7) and 34; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR2008Mad181; [2008]85SCL421(Mad); AIR2008Mad181; 2008(4)AIRKarR285(FB)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajasekaran, Adv. in W.P. No. 37148/2007 and Vijay Narayanan, Sr. Counsel for Narmada Sampath W.P. No. 1418/08;;;V.T. Gopalan, Addl. Solicitor General Ass

ORDERA.P. Shah, C.J.1. Interpretation of the amended provisions of Sections 13 and 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, hereinafter for brevity's sake referred to as 'the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 1995

U.P. Co-operative Spinning Mills Federation Ltd. Vs. Pukh Raj Mantri

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-11-1995

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226

Reported in : [1995(70)FLR841]; (1995)IILLJ1101All; (1995)1UPLBEC442

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Upadhyaya and ;Ramesh Upadhyaya, Advs.

1. The controversy here is with regard to the validity of the withdrawal of resignation from service and the consequences thereof.2. To give the relevant factual background, on October 13, 1982, Pukh Raj Mantri was appointed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial