Advanced Search Results
Bheru Lal Vs. State
Rajasthan
Sep-18-2008
Criminal
RLW2009(1)Raj565
A.M. Kapadia, J.1. Sole appellant ('the accused', for short) was charged and tried by learned Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Chittorgarh in Sessions Case No. 208/01 for offence under Section 302 and 201 of the Indian...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Aski. Jairaj Vs. B. Champalal JaIn and ors.
Chennai
Feb-18-2004
SICA
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 16, 17, 22 and 22(1)
II(2004)BC373; [2004]122CompCas79(Mad); (2004)2MLJ235; [2004]54SCL432(Mad)
Chitra Narayanan, Adv.
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J. 1. Since the petitioner is one and the same and issue raised is also similar, they are being disposed of by the following common Order. C.R.P.No. 3388 of 2001 is directed against the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC. Manuel Vs. Management of Needle Industries (India) Ltd. Keeti, Nilg ...
Chennai
Mar-05-1981
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2, 10, 10(1), 12, 12(5), 20 and 22; Tamil Nadu Industrial Disputes Rules - Rule 24
(1981)IILLJ102Mad
1. In the present Writ Petition, the petitioner challenges the award dated 2-7-1977 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore, the 2nd respondent herein, in I.D. No. 44 of 1977, Certain admitted facts have got...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
A. Venkatesan and Another Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its ...
Chennai
Oct-30-2012
Land Acquisition
For the Contemnor: A. Venkatesan, Contemnor appeared in person, A. Navaneethakrishnan, Advocate General (for assisting the Court). For the Petitioners: S. Ramasamy, Senior Counsel for R. Girirajan, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, to R4, A. Navaneethakr
(Prayer in Suo Motu Contempt Petition No.1438/2012 : Suo Motu Contempt Proceedings initiated against the Contemnor herein as per order dated 04.10.2012 made in H.C.P.Nos.380, 617 and 1406 of 2012 Prayer in W.P.No.27632/2012: Petition filed under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.M. MuneeruddIn and 4 Others Vs. P.M. Punnoose
Chennai
Jan-28-2000
Tenancy
Tamil Nadu Buildings ( Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 -- Sections 8(5), 10(3) and 11(4)
2000(2)CTC577
Mr. A. Venkatesan, Adv.
ORDER1. The matter arises under the Rent Control Act. The owners are the revision petitioners. The eviction of the respondent/tenant was sought on the ground of wilful default in the payment of rent from 1.11.1988 to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Shree Bajrang Jute Mills Ltd., Guntur
Chennai
Feb-04-1957
Civil
Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 39
AIR1962Mad218
E. Venkatesan, Adv.
Rajamannar, C.J. (1) Three points were pressed upon us by Mr. E. Venkatesan, learned counsel for the appellant in this case. The appeal is against the judgment of Rajagopalan, J., confirming the order of the Railway...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijaya Vs. Raman
Chennai
Nov-16-1996
CriminalFamily
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125
I(1997)DMC67
V. Venkatesan, Adv.
Karpagavinayagam, J.1. The petitioner wife filed an application for maintenance in M.C. No. 1 of 1986 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Dharapuram. The Magistrate after consideration of the materials produced by both...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.E.Sathyanarayana Reddi Vs. C.E.Sulochana and Others
Chennai
Sep-14-2012
Education
For the Applicant: V.K.Vijayaraghavan, Advocate. For the Respondents: A.Venkatesan, Advocate.
(APPLICATION under Order XLVII Rules 1 and 2 and Section 114 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment dated 19.8.2009 made in O.S.A.No.355 of 2008.) P. JYOTHIMANI, J. The appellant, against whom the judgment was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunian Vs. Kesava Pandithan and ors.
Chennai
Oct-29-1954
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 33, Rules 1, 5 and 8 - Order 7, Rules 11
AIR1955Mad467
S. Venkatesan, Adv.
ORDERBasheer Ahmed Sayeed, J.1. C. R. P. No. 1079 of 1952 arises out of an order passed by the learned District Munsif of Vridhachalam, refusing leave to the petitioner to file a suit in 'iorma pauperis'...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Karim Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and Others Etc. Etc.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-07-2000
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 321; National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 14; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 143, 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 326, 341, 342 and 396; Indian Explosives Act - Sections 3, 4 and 5; Arms Act - Sections 3 and 25; Tamil Nadu Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Preventive Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(3), 4, 4(1) and 5
2001(1)ALD(Cri)12; 2001(1)ALT(Cri)14; 2001CriLJ148; 2000(7)SCALE313; [2000]Supp4SCR382; AIR 2001 SC 116
S.P. Bharucha, J.1. The border between the States of Karnataka and Tamil Nadu runs through mountainous forest. On about 16,000 acres of this forest land, half in Karnataka and half in Tamil Nadu, a man named...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »