Advanced Search Results
P. Bravani Shankar and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.
Chennai
Aug-21-1998
Direct Taxation
(1999)155CTR(Mad)402
ORDERP. SA THASHIVAM, J. :The petitioners numbering 16 who are employees of Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Ranipet, aggrieved by the Circular dt. 12th Feb., 1990 of the third respondent have approached this Court for quashing the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Duraisamy Vs. State of Tamilnadu, Represented by Its Secretary to G ...
Chennai
Aug-11-2006
Property
Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1), 5A and 6; Housing Board Act - Sections 37 to 56 and 70
(2006)4MLJ576
K.V. Subramanian, Sr. Counsel for ;K. Goviganesan, Adv.
P. Sathasivam, J.1. The above Writ Appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge, dated 11.07.2001, made in W.P. No. 9521 of 1994, in and by which, the learned Judge, after finding that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. New Horizon Sugar Mills Ltd.
Chennai
Feb-25-1997
Direct Taxation
Molasses Control (Amendment) Order, 1962; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 36(1), 37, 37(1), 37(2A), 40A (7), 143(3), 144B and 256
(1997)139CTR(Mad)130; [1999]237ITR102(Mad)
S.V. Subramanian, Adv.
N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. The Tribunal, at the instance of the Revenue, has referred the following questions of law under s. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961 for the opinion of this Court : '1. Whether, on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Seshasayee Bros. (P) Ltd.
Chennai
Feb-11-1997
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 5 and 28
[1999]239ITR471(Mad)
S.V. Subramanian and ;C.V. Rajan, Advs.
N.V. Balasubramanian, J. 1. Pursuant to the directions of this Court, the Tribunal has stated a case and referred the following question of law for the opinion of this Court : '1. Whether, on the facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Chennai
Jan-02-1997
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37 and 37(2A)
[1998]233ITR779(Mad)
S.V. Subramanian, Adv.
N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. At the instance of the CIT, Tamil Nadu-II, Madras, the Tribunal has stated a case and referred the following question of law under s. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. K.P. Madan Mohan
Chennai
Jan-11-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 28, 37(1) 56(2) and 57
[1996]222ITR1(Mad)
Deokinandan and ;S.V. Subramanian, Advs.
Thanikkachalam, J.1. At the instance of the Department, the Tribunal referred the following question for the opinion of this court under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, 'the Act') : 'Whether, on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJail Electronic (Partnership Firm) Rep. by Its Partner N. Jayakumar Vs ...
Chennai
Jun-11-2007
BankingInsurance
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 13(2)
2007(5)CTC451
K.V. Subramanian, Sr. Counsel for ;M.A. Abdul Wahab, Adv.
ORDERP. Jyothimani, J.1. The Writ Petition No. 41416 of 2005 has been filed to forbear the respondent Bank from proceeding with the sale by auction or other modes in respect of the guarantee relating to Shri....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPalanichamy Vs. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endow ...
Chennai Madurai
Aug-22-2016
Land Acquisition
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for records of the impugned notice, dated 29.08.2016 in Na.Ka.No.1795/2014-1/A3, issued by the 2nd...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSpencer Consumer Products and Services Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central E ...
Chennai
Feb-03-1987
Excise
Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 35F
1988(34)ELT19(Mad)
S.V. Subramanian, Adv.
ORDERNainar Sundaram, J.1. As against the impugned order, an appeal is competent. What Mr. S.V. Subramanian, learned counsel for the petitioner, would state is that the amount involved in large and further, Section 35F of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRoyapettah Benefit Fund Investors Grievance Consortium, Regn No. 302/2 ...
Chennai
Jun-28-2000
Company
Constitution of India -- Article 226; Companies Act, 1956 -- Sections 403
2000(3)CTC338
Mr. K.V. Subramanian, Adv.
ORDER1. Petitioner seeks for an issue of writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to appoint a fit and proper person as custodian for taking over the management of 6th respondent and take immediate control...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »