Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a v raghavan · Page 1 of about 934 results (0.429 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 16 2009

B. Krishna Reddy S/O. Venkata Rami Reddy Vs. M.D. Sudheendra Rao S/O. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-16-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 166 and 181; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 127; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 141 - Order 5, Rules 17, 19 and 20 - Order 21, Rules 54 and 66 - Order 26 - Order 48, Rule 2; Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1882 - Sections 647; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 540

Reported in : 2009(3)ALT26

Advocate for Appellant : C. Hanumantha Raayudu, Adv.

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. This Court on 27-2-2009 ordered urgent notice.2. Sri K. Rathangapani Reddy, the learned Counsel representing the 1st respondent/contesting respondent entered appearance.3. Heard Sri Hanumantha Rayudu, the learned Counsel representing the Revision Petitioner and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 1952

In Re: Ramaswami Reddiar and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-22-1952

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 164, 176, 176(1), 364 and 533(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 21

Reported in : AIR1953Mad138; (1952)2MLJ814

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Raghavan, Adv. as Amicus Curiae

1. The two appellants, who incidentally bear the same name, have been found guilty under Section 302 I.P.C. of the murder of Sellappa Reddiar, an elderly man in the early hours of the 17th of May...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 1963

E. Rangarajulu Naidu and ors. Vs. Madura Srinivasa Mills Ltd. and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-24-1963

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 27 and 179; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 36 and 457

Reported in : AIR1963Mad409; [1963]33CompCas453(Mad); (1963)1MLJ276

Advocate for Appellant : V.V. Raghavan and ;U. Sriniwasan, Advs.

S. Ramachandra Iyer, C.J.1. This appeal which is filed under Section 483 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, by certain share-holders of the Madura Srinivasa Mills Ltd., now under liquidation, concerns the correctness of the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 20 1967

Trustees of the Port of Madras Vs. Home Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-20-1967

Subject : ContractLimitation

Acts : Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 6, 39, 39(1), 40, 41, 41A, 104, 110 and 111; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 102; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 151, 152 and 161; Madras General Clauses Act, 1891 - Sections 3(2) and 3(22); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(42); Marine Insurance Act, 1963 - Sections 79; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 92, 130A and 135A; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 120

Reported in : AIR1970Mad48

Advocate for Appellant : V.V. Raghavan and ;N. Nagarajan, Advs.

1. I have had the advantage of reading the judgment just delivered by my learned brother. I entirely agree with him, not merely on the conclusion that the appeals ought to be allowed, but also on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 1966

E.R. Sitarama Reddiar Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-01-1966

Subject : Election

Reported in : (1968)2MLJ615

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.V. Raghavan

ORDERP.S. Kailasam, J.1. This petition is filed by the Chairman of the Panchayat Union Council, Rishivandyam, against whom a motion of no-confidence had been passed for the issue of a writ of certiorari calling for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1966

Trustees of the Port of Madras Vs. Mettur Chemical and Industries Ltd. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-21-1966

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 110; Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 15(2) and 29(2)

Reported in : AIR1967Mad102

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.V. Raghavan

1. This revision has been preferred by the Trustees of the Port of Madras, defendants in a suit for the recovery of damages for short delivery of goods. It is a finding of the Court of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1966

The Trustees of the Port of Madras Vs. Mettur Chemical and Industries ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-21-1966

Subject : CivilLimitation

Reported in : (1968)1MLJ162

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.V. Raghavan

M. Natesan, J.1. This revision has been preferred by the Trustees of the Port of Madras, defendants in a suit for the recovery of damages for short delivery of goods. It is a finding of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1962

M.S.A. Jayaraman Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-28-1962

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1962)2MLJ300

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.V. Raghavan

S. Ramachandra Iyer, C.J.1. This appeal which is directed against the Judgment of Veeraswami, J., arises out of an application filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a writ of mandamus to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 1970

A.S. Krishnamurthi Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer, Saidapet, Chinglepu ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-03-1970

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 141 and 152

Reported in : AIR1971Mad236

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. V. Raghavan

1. (3-12-1969): For setting up the Industrial Estate, Guindy, certain plots of land on the outskirts of the City but in Alandur Village were acquired by issuing a notification dated October 12, 1960 under Sec. 4(1)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 1949

Navan Kattayya Goundan Vs. Mambattanveettu Kannan Alias Periabbu Gound ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-03-1949

Subject : Property

Acts : Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR1950Mad598

Advocate for Appellant : V.V. Raghavan, Adv.

Vishwanatha Sastri, J.1. The plaintiff is the appellant in this second appeal. He sued for an injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with his right to go on the defendant's land and having access to ten...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial