Advanced Search Results
Shriyaskumar Vs. Laxman
Mumbai
Aug-30-1985
Tenancy
Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 27A and 27B
AIR1986Bom183; 1985(2)BomCR697; 1986MhLJ736
A.V. Mohta, Adv.
ORDER1. This revision raises a short but interesting question of interpretation of Ss. 27A and 27B of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, in its application to the State of Maharashtra relating to distress warrant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Panna Sunit Khatau and Others Vs. Dilip Dharamsey Khatau and Othe ...
Mumbai
Apr-12-2013
Land Acquisition
Oral Judgment: By this petition filed under section 30 read with section 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, the petitioner seeks to challenge the interim award dated 4th December, 1985, directions dated 10th September, 1985, 25th...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevidas Vs. Chandrakala and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-10-1995
Motor Vehicles
1996ACJ566
A.V. Mohta, Adv.
V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. By these counsel notes, the appellants take an exception to the order passed by the Additional Registrar (Judicial) of this court, dated 15.9.1995.These are the appeals under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Victor Fernandes and ors Vs. Raghav Bahl of Noida and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-21-2011
MRTP
JUDGMENT: (Per Anoop V. Mohta,J.) 1. The Appellants (original Plaintiffs) appealed against an order dated 8 August 2008 passed by the learned Single Judge in Notice of Motion No.3232 of 2006 in Suit No.2709/2006, whereby no...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRadhika George and ors Vs. 6 Tanishq Builders.
Mumbai
Apr-24-2012
Land Acquisition
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 - Section 95A; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act - Section 164
ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.1 Heard by consent of the parties in view of order of Division Bench dated 11 January 2012 thereby directed to hear and dispose of the Writ Petition with restricted prayer clauses which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharat Oman Refineries Ltd. Vs. Mantech Consultants
Mumbai
May-02-2012
Arbitration
ArbitrationandConciliationAct; 1996-Sections34; 11; 33; 16
E.P. Bharucha, Prantik Majumdar, M.P. Savla And Co. Advs.
1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 2 nd September, 2011 passed by the learned single Judge in Arbitration Petition No. 477 of 2006. By the aforesaid order, the learned single Judge allowed the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ravi Construction
Gujarat
Dec-16-2014
Direct Taxation
K.S. Jhaveri, J. 1. This is an appeal by the appellant-Revenue, seeking to challenge the order of the learned ITAT, Ahmedabad Bench 'C' (for short, 'the Tribunal'), Dated : 01.02.2002, rendered in ITA No. 2405/AHD/1996 for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaheja Universal Pvt. Limited Vs. B.E. Billimoria and Co. Limited
Mumbai
Mar-31-2016
Land Acquisition
Anoop V. Mohta, J. 1. This is an Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Arbitration Act ) filed by the original Respondent-Billimoria and Co., challenging the Judgment of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWay2Wealth Brokers Pvt Ltd. Vs. C.B. Sharma
Mumbai
Mar-14-2016
Arbitration
Anoop V. Mohta, J. 1. The Appellants (original Respondents) have filed the present Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act of 1996) against judgment dated 12 September 2014 passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVithalrao Udhaorao Uttarwar and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-13-1976
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 15, 15(3), 16, 17, 19, 19(1), 21, 22, 25, 25(1), (2), (2A), (2B), (3), (4), (5) and (6),29(1), 31, 31(2), 31-A, 31-B, 31-C, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 39, 50, 53(1), 53(2), 132, 133, 226, 277, 245, 246, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 301, 352, 354, 355, 357, 358, 359(1), 359(1-A), 360, 367, 368 and 394; Constitution (Fortieth Amendment) Act; Constitution (Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Act, 1972; Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Lowering of Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2-A, 2(5), 22(5), 2(9), 2(21), 2(30), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(14), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 5(1), 8, 9, 10, 10(1), 4(1), 11, 12, 12(2), 13, 13(2), 13(3), 14, 15, 16, 16(3), 17, 17(1), 18, 21, 21-A(1), 21(4), 23, 27, 28
AIR1977Bom99
R.M. Hajarnavis, S.R. Deshpande, S.N. Kherdekar, J.N. Chandurkar, B.R. Mandlekar, R.N. Deshpande, V.L. Mohta, R.N. Pendharkar, V.R. Manohar, V.S. Sohoni, R.M. Joharapurkar, B.P. Jaiswal, M.S. Choudhar
Masodkar, J. 1. These 2661 cases have clogged the Court's corridors for considerable time, challenging the provisions of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 (Act No. 27 of 1961) as amended by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »