Advanced Search Results
People for Elemination of Stray Troubles by Its Convener Dr. Rosario M ...
Mumbai
Dec-19-2008
Civil
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 - Sections 2, 3, 4 to 10, 11 to 13, 13(3), 15, 20, 20(3), 25J, 25J(2) and 28 to 41; Goa Municipalities Act, 1968 - Sections 278, 278(1), 278(2), 278(3), 278(4), 278(5) and 278A; Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 191BA, 191BA(1), 191BA(2), 191BA(3) and 191BA(4); Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1975 - Sections 13, 40, 41(1) and 41(3); State of Jammu and Kashmir Government Servants (Prevention of Corruption) Act, 1962; Right to Information Act (RTI); Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1957 - Sections 6R(2); West Bengal Municipalities (Amendment) Act; Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1978; Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Acquisition Act, 1976 - Sec
2009(1)BomCR501
Jaydeep S. Deo, Adv. in W.P.(PIL) No. 111 of 2005 and in W.P. No. 6257 of 2006, ;A.V. Anturkar and ;S.B. Deshmukh, Advs. in W.P. No. 8120 of 2007, ;S.M. Gorwadkar and ;H.V. Kode, Advs. in W.P. No. 306
S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. In the above, the following questions have been>referred to us by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice:(1) Whether in the circumstances and seriousness of the problem, the danger posed and the menace caused by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Gajanan Joshi Vs. State of Maharashtra,
Mumbai
Mar-31-2004
ConstitutionTrusts and Societies
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21 and 226; Development Control Regulations; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 37, 37(1) and 37(2), Regulation 165; Co-operative Societies Act; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 16
2004(4)ALLMR223; 2004(5)BomCR825
A.V. Anturkar, Adv.
C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. The petitioner by invoking Article 226 of the Constitution as pro bono publico has prayed for a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order for grant of benefits of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Sails India Vs. Mrs. Rita M. Rupani
Mumbai
Sep-24-1996
Tenancy
Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13-A2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 4; Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 13
AIR1997Bom247; 1997(2)BomCR151; 1997(2)MhLj269
A.V. Anturkar and ;Nainar Dayakar, Advs.
ORDER1. Rule returnable forthwith. By consent, the Civil Revision Application is heard finally at this stage.2. On 30-7-1996, the Competent Authority (Rent Act), Konkan Division, Bombay, allowed the application made by the respondent herein Mrs. Rita...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Subhash Tatoda Nikam Vs. the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature of Bomba ...
Mumbai
Dec-03-1998
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 226 and 311
1999(1)BomCR760
A.V. Anturkar and ;Chandrakant Chavan, Advs.
ORDERDr. B.P. Saraf, J.1. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order of the High Court dated 12th February, 1996 in Administration Appeal of the petitioner against the order of his dismissal from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskZahida NizamuddIn Jalal and ors. Vs. Abidali Jafferali Syyed and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-19-2002
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 94, 115 and 115(1) - Order 38, Rules 2, 3 and 6 - Order 43, Rule 1; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) Amendment Act, 1999
2003(1)ALLMR206; 2003(2)BomCR374; 2002(4)MhLj913
Y.S. Jahagirdar, Senior Adv. and ;G.S. Godbole, Adv.;A.S. Oak, ;A.V. Anturkar, ;V.Z. Kankaria, ;G.S. Godbole, ;V.K. Shah, ;U.P. Warunjikar and ;P.R. Naidu, Advs.
R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. The petitioners challenge the order dated 7th August, 2002 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kalyan District -Thane under Exh. 40 in Reg. Civ. Suit No. 471 of 1998. By the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnand Govind Bhide Vs. Smt. Rohini Bhide
Mumbai
Nov-22-2000
FamilyCivil
Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 7(1) and 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151
I(2001)DMC646
A.V. Anturkar, Adv.
Ranjana Desai, J. 1. In this appeal judgment and order dated 24.1.2000, passed by the learned Single Judge in F.A. No. 377 of 1990 is under challenge. The appellant is the original defendant and the respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubhas Anna Kool Daund Taluka Sahakari Dudh Uttapadak Sangh Maryadit ( ...
Mumbai
May-02-2006
Civil
Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 9(1); U.P. Intermediate Education Act; Bombay Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1953; Bombay Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1954; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 29A; Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 - Rule 18; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rules 4 and 4(1); Constitution of India -Articles 217(2), 226 and 227
2006(4)ALLMR37; 2006(4)BomCR607; 2006(4)MhLj611
Sarvasri A.V. Anturkar and ;Sandeep Salunke, Advs.
R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Admit. Heard forthwith by consent. The appellant challenges the judgment and order dated 25-10-2005 passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition No. 7404 of 2005. By the impugned order, the learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.V. Shah and A.V. Bhat, Now Known as Shah Promoters and Developers Th ...
Mumbai
Apr-29-2005
PropertyCivil
Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 14, 22, 25, 37, 37(1), 43, 44, 45, 46, 49, 53, 55, 56, 58, 59, 73, 89, 90, 107, 112, 125, 127, 126(1), 126(2), 135, 136, 136(1), 142 and 152; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 2(15), 2(19), 68, 68(1), 68(2) and 73
2005(3)ALLMR197; 2006(3)BomCR216
Y.S. Jahagirdar, Senior Counsel, i/b., G.S. Godbole, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 7846 of 2004, ;K.K. Singhvi, Senior Counsel i/b., P.B. Shah, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 9644 of 2004 and ;A.V. Anturkar, A
R.M. Lodha, J.1. The arguments advanced before us in this batch of three writ petitions have crystalised two issues for our determination. These issues are:(i) Whether the designation of the land bearing survey Nos.577 Hissa No.1,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Satish Dattatray Nadgauda Vs. the State of Maharashtra,
Mumbai
May-03-2007
ServiceConstitution
MEPS Act; Maharashtra Official Languages Act, 1964 - Sections 5; Goa, Daman and Diu Reorganisation Act, 1987 - Sections 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 16, 17, 20, 120, 122, 123, 141 - Rule 2 and 2(1); Constitution of India - Articles 154, 226, 229(2), 234, 235, 309, 345, 348, 348(1), 348(2) and 348(3)
2008(1)ALLMR184; 2007(3)BomCR791; (2007)109BOMLR1089; 2007(4)MhLj475
M.M. Sathaye, Adv.;A.V. Anturkar, ;R.S. Apte and ;Uday Warunjikar, Advs.
F.I. Rebello, J.1. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The petitioner had approached this Court to challenge the legality and propriety of G.R. dated 29.7.2006 and G.R. dated 25.11.2005 as described in prayer Clause (b) and for a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNachane Ashiwni Shivram and ors. Etc. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr ...
Mumbai
Apr-25-1997
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 162, 226, 371 and 371(2); Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 61, 63, 64, 461 and 463; Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Sections 5(15), 5(60) and 65
1997(4)ALLMR602; 1997(3)BomCR680; (1997)4BOMLR556; 1998(2)MhLj234
M.M. Vashi, ;S.V. Sadavarte, ;G.B. Lohiya, ;A.V. Mohta, ;Pradeep Deshmukh, ;A.V. Anturkar, ;M.L. Patil, ;T.S. Ingole, ;R.S. Apte, ;C.S. Dharmadhikari, ;Sunil V. Manohar, ;E.P. Bharucha and ;M.B. Rao,
Ashok Agarwal, J.1. A Division Bench at Bombay is not ad idem with the views expressed by similar Benches, one at Nagpur and the other at Aurangabad. The Honourable the Chief Justice has, in the circumstances,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »