Advanced Search Results

People for Elemination of Stray Troubles by Its Convener Dr. Rosario M ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 - Sections 2, 3, 4 to 10, 11 to 13, 13(3), 15, 20, 20(3), 25J, 25J(2) and 28 to 41; Goa Municipalities Act, 1968 - Sections 278, 278(1), 278(2), 278(3), 278(4), 278(5) and 278A; Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 191BA, 191BA(1), 191BA(2), 191BA(3) and 191BA(4); Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1975 - Sections 13, 40, 41(1) and 41(3); State of Jammu and Kashmir Government Servants (Prevention of Corruption) Act, 1962; Right to Information Act (RTI); Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1957 - Sections 6R(2); West Bengal Municipalities (Amendment) Act; Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1978; Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Acquisition Act, 1976 - Sec

Reported in : 2009(1)BomCR501

Advocate for Appellant : Jaydeep S. Deo, Adv. in W.P.(PIL) No. 111 of 2005 and in W.P. No. 6257 of 2006, ;A.V. Anturkar and ;S.B. Deshmukh, Advs. in W.P. No. 8120 of 2007, ;S.M. Gorwadkar and ;H.V. Kode, Advs. in W.P. No. 306

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. In the above, the following questions have been>referred to us by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice:(1) Whether in the circumstances and seriousness of the problem, the danger posed and the menace caused by...

Ashok Gajanan Joshi Vs. State of Maharashtra,

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ConstitutionTrusts and Societies

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21 and 226; Development Control Regulations; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 37, 37(1) and 37(2), Regulation 165; Co-operative Societies Act; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 16

Reported in : 2004(4)ALLMR223; 2004(5)BomCR825

Advocate for Appellant : A.V. Anturkar, Adv.

C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. The petitioner by invoking Article 226 of the Constitution as pro bono publico has prayed for a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order for grant of benefits of...

M/S. Sails India Vs. Mrs. Rita M. Rupani

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13-A2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 4; Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 13

Reported in : AIR1997Bom247; 1997(2)BomCR151; 1997(2)MhLj269

Advocate for Appellant : A.V. Anturkar and ;Nainar Dayakar, Advs.

ORDER1. Rule returnable forthwith. By consent, the Civil Revision Application is heard finally at this stage.2. On 30-7-1996, the Competent Authority (Rent Act), Konkan Division, Bombay, allowed the application made by the respondent herein Mrs. Rita...

Subhash Tatoda Nikam Vs. the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature of Bomba ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 226 and 311

Reported in : 1999(1)BomCR760

Advocate for Appellant : A.V. Anturkar and ;Chandrakant Chavan, Advs.

ORDERDr. B.P. Saraf, J.1. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order of the High Court dated 12th February, 1996 in Administration Appeal of the petitioner against the order of his dismissal from...

Zahida NizamuddIn Jalal and ors. Vs. Abidali Jafferali Syyed and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 94, 115 and 115(1) - Order 38, Rules 2, 3 and 6 - Order 43, Rule 1; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) Amendment Act, 1999

Reported in : 2003(1)ALLMR206; 2003(2)BomCR374; 2002(4)MhLj913

Advocate for Appellant : Y.S. Jahagirdar, Senior Adv. and ;G.S. Godbole, Adv.;A.S. Oak, ;A.V. Anturkar, ;V.Z. Kankaria, ;G.S. Godbole, ;V.K. Shah, ;U.P. Warunjikar and ;P.R. Naidu, Advs.

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. The petitioners challenge the order dated 7th August, 2002 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kalyan District -Thane under Exh. 40 in Reg. Civ. Suit No. 471 of 1998. By the...

Smt. Vithabai Balwant Jadhav Vs. Shri Shripati Tukaram Jorkar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (2000)102BOMLR57

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. A.V. Anturkar

A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. This writ petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution, has been filed by the petitioner-landlady challenging the order passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Pune dated 28.7.1986.2. The husband of the Petitioner-landlady, original...

Yeshwant Maruti Lonkar, Since Deceased, by His Legal Heirs Shri Kalida ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.V. Anturkar

1. Heard Mr. A.V. Anturkar, learned counsel for the appellants, Mr. V.S.Kapse, learned counsel for respondent nos.1(g),1(h) and 1(i), Mr. A.Y.Sakhare, learned Senior Counsel for respondent no.2 in both the Appeals at length. 2. The short...

Govinddas W. Shah Vs. Administrator, Saswad Mali Sahakari Sakhar Karkh ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F and 25FF

Reported in : 2001(1)BomCR415; [2001(88)FLR377]; (2002)IVLLJ281Bom

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. A.V. Anturkar

Vijay Daga, J.1. This petition is directed against the order of the learned Member, Industrial Court, Pune dated July 31, 1984 passed in Appeal (I.C/P.N.) Nos. 19, 20 and 21 of 1983 under the provisions of...

Anand Govind Bhide Vs. Smt. Rohini Bhide

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 7(1) and 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151

Reported in : I(2001)DMC646

Advocate for Appellant : A.V. Anturkar, Adv.

Ranjana Desai, J. 1. In this appeal judgment and order dated 24.1.2000, passed by the learned Single Judge in F.A. No. 377 of 1990 is under challenge. The appellant is the original defendant and the respondent...

Subhas Anna Kool Daund Taluka Sahakari Dudh Uttapadak Sangh Maryadit ( ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 9(1); U.P. Intermediate Education Act; Bombay Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1953; Bombay Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1954; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 29A; Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 - Rule 18; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rules 4 and 4(1); Constitution of India -Articles 217(2), 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(4)ALLMR37; 2006(4)BomCR607; 2006(4)MhLj611

Advocate for Appellant : Sarvasri A.V. Anturkar and ;Sandeep Salunke, Advs.

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Admit. Heard forthwith by consent. The appellant challenges the judgment and order dated 25-10-2005 passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition No. 7404 of 2005. By the impugned order, the learned...