Advanced Search Results
The Union of India (Uoi) Represented by Deputy Chief Personnel Officer ...
Chennai
Dec-19-2005
Service
(2005)3MLJ588
R. Thiyagarajan, Sr. Counsel for ;V.G. Suresh Kumar, Adv.
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. Considering the limited issue raised, by consent of the petitioner and the contesting second respondent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for disposal.2. Aggrieved by the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.S. Nanda Rao and ors. Vs. V.M. Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar
Chennai
Mar-11-1965
Tenancy
(1969)1MLJ153
M. Natesan, J.1. The legal representatives of the defendant in a suit in ejectment, who have failed in both the Courts below, are the appellants before me; and the question for consideration in the second appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGipoint Development Limited Vs. Collector of Customs, Madras
Chennai
Oct-03-1991
Customs
1995(80)ELT55(Mad)
ORDER1. Writ Petition Nos. 10045 and 10940 of 1991 are filed by Gipoint Development Limited, Hongkong and Writ Petition Nos. 10046 and 10939 of 1991 are filed by Hongkong Polychem Company. Both companies are incorporated under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State Rep by Vs. K.Sivanesan
Chennai
Mar-30-2012
Criminal
Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1)(10) and 3(2)(7); Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 1998 - Sections 3, 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 499; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 227, 197; Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 1998 - Sections 3 and 4 ; Women Harassment Act. - Sections 3 and 4
Mrs.S.Prabha, Adv.
PrayerCriminal Revision case filed under Sections 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records pertaining to the order passed in Cr.M.P.No.1184 of 2011 in Spl.S.C.No.36 of 2011 on the file of the III Additional...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.M. Dinesh Vs. the Union Territory of Pondicherry Through the Chief S ...
Chennai
Feb-11-2006
CommercialConstitution
Pondicherry Municipalities Act, 1973 - Sections 35, 104, 349, 349(3), 350, 352, 353, 355 and 430(3); ;Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 46 and 46(1); ;Pondicherry Municipalities (Places of Public Resort and Entertainments), Rules 1980 - Rules 2, 2(1), 26(1), 26(2) and 233; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 166, 166(1), 239 and 309
AIR2006Mad166; (2006)2MLJ212
R. Thiyagarajan, Senior Counsel for ;R. Sunil Kumar, Adv.
ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. The petitioner submits that he has filed an application before the third respondent for grant of Municipal Licence for the purpose of holding Indian Classical Dance at Hotel Al Rasheed, Citadel at Door...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.M. Dinesh Vs. Pondicherry Municipality Represented by Its Commission ...
Chennai
Feb-11-2006
Commercial
Pondicherry Municipalities Act - Sections 35, 349, 350, 352 and 430(3); Pondicherry Municipalities Rules - Rule 233; Pondicherry Municipalities (Places of Public Resort and Entertainment) Rules, 1950 - Rule 2; Pondicherry Municipalities Regulations; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 239
2006(1)CTC585
R. Thiyagarajan, Sr. Counsel for ;R. Sunil Kumar, Adv.
ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. By consent of the counsel on either side, the writ petition itself is taken up for disposal.2. The petitioner, in support of the relief asked for, has submitted that he is a businessman...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBheena Pharma Japadar Vs. Union of India
Chennai
Dec-12-1991
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 107, 108 and 124
1992(40)ECC79; 1992(58)ELT480(Mad)
Shri R. Thiyagarajan, ;for Shri M. Muthappan, Adv.
ORDER1. Both the writ petitions filed by two different firms through the power of Attorney Agent are directed against the summons issued by the fourth respondent on 11-10-1991 under Section 108 of the Customs Act.2. These...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCholan Paper and Board Mill Private Ltd., Rep. by Its Managing Directo ...
Chennai
Oct-17-2003
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections2(1), 24 and 129A
2003LC1033(Madras)
R. Thiyagarajan, Sr. Counsel for ;V. Bharathidasan, Adv.
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. By consent of both parties, the writ petition itself is taken up for disposal.2. Cholan Paper and Board Mill Private Ltd., aggrieved by the order of the Commissioner of Customs - first respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Sri Ragavendra Ad Lab Rep. by Its Proprietor and Others Vs. the S ...
Chennai
Dec-04-2012
Service Tax
2013(1)CWC87; 2013WLR66
For the Petitioners: T.R. Rajagopalan, Senior Counsel for S. Rajendrakumar , Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, R. Thiyagarajan, Senior Counsel for P.T. Ramkumar, R2, P.H. Aravind Pandian Additional Advocate General Assisted by G. Anantharangan, R. Arunmo
(PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 2nd respondent, its officers, subordinates or any one acting under or through him from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVaigai Traders Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Aug-05-2009
Sales Tax/Vat
Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 7A
(2010)27VST486(Mad)
A. Thiyagarajan, Sr. Counsel for S. Ramsh Kumar, Adv.
ORDERF.M. Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.1. This tax case revision has been preferred by the assessee, where the following substantial questions of law have been framed:(i) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »