Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a thiyagarajan · Page 1 of about 411 results (0.190 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 19 2005

The Union of India (Uoi) Represented by Deputy Chief Personnel Officer ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-19-2005

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2005)3MLJ588

Advocate for Appellant : R. Thiyagarajan, Sr. Counsel for ;V.G. Suresh Kumar, Adv.

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. Considering the limited issue raised, by consent of the petitioner and the contesting second respondent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for disposal.2. Aggrieved by the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1965

B.S. Nanda Rao and ors. Vs. V.M. Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-11-1965

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1969)1MLJ153

M. Natesan, J.1. The legal representatives of the defendant in a suit in ejectment, who have failed in both the Courts below, are the appellants before me; and the question for consideration in the second appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 1991

Gipoint Development Limited Vs. Collector of Customs, Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-03-1991

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1995(80)ELT55(Mad)

ORDER1. Writ Petition Nos. 10045 and 10940 of 1991 are filed by Gipoint Development Limited, Hongkong and Writ Petition Nos. 10046 and 10939 of 1991 are filed by Hongkong Polychem Company. Both companies are incorporated under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 30 2012

State Rep by Vs. K.Sivanesan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-30-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1)(10) and 3(2)(7); Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 1998 - Sections 3, 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 499; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 227, 197; Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 1998 - Sections 3 and 4 ; Women Harassment Act. - Sections 3 and 4

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs.S.Prabha, Adv.

PrayerCriminal Revision case filed under Sections 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records pertaining to the order passed in Cr.M.P.No.1184 of 2011 in Spl.S.C.No.36 of 2011 on the file of the III Additional...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2006

M.M. Dinesh Vs. the Union Territory of Pondicherry Through the Chief S ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-11-2006

Subject : CommercialConstitution

Acts : Pondicherry Municipalities Act, 1973 - Sections 35, 104, 349, 349(3), 350, 352, 353, 355 and 430(3); ;Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 46 and 46(1); ;Pondicherry Municipalities (Places of Public Resort and Entertainments), Rules 1980 - Rules 2, 2(1), 26(1), 26(2) and 233; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 166, 166(1), 239 and 309

Reported in : AIR2006Mad166; (2006)2MLJ212

Advocate for Appellant : R. Thiyagarajan, Senior Counsel for ;R. Sunil Kumar, Adv.

ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. The petitioner submits that he has filed an application before the third respondent for grant of Municipal Licence for the purpose of holding Indian Classical Dance at Hotel Al Rasheed, Citadel at Door...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2006

M.M. Dinesh Vs. Pondicherry Municipality Represented by Its Commission ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-11-2006

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Pondicherry Municipalities Act - Sections 35, 349, 350, 352 and 430(3); Pondicherry Municipalities Rules - Rule 233; Pondicherry Municipalities (Places of Public Resort and Entertainment) Rules, 1950 - Rule 2; Pondicherry Municipalities Regulations; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 239

Reported in : 2006(1)CTC585

Advocate for Appellant : R. Thiyagarajan, Sr. Counsel for ;R. Sunil Kumar, Adv.

ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. By consent of the counsel on either side, the writ petition itself is taken up for disposal.2. The petitioner, in support of the relief asked for, has submitted that he is a businessman...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 1991

Bheena Pharma Japadar Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-12-1991

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 107, 108 and 124

Reported in : 1992(40)ECC79; 1992(58)ELT480(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri R. Thiyagarajan, ;for Shri M. Muthappan, Adv.

ORDER1. Both the writ petitions filed by two different firms through the power of Attorney Agent are directed against the summons issued by the fourth respondent on 11-10-1991 under Section 108 of the Customs Act.2. These...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2003

Cholan Paper and Board Mill Private Ltd., Rep. by Its Managing Directo ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-17-2003

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections2(1), 24 and 129A

Reported in : 2003LC1033(Madras)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Thiyagarajan, Sr. Counsel for ;V. Bharathidasan, Adv.

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. By consent of both parties, the writ petition itself is taken up for disposal.2. Cholan Paper and Board Mill Private Ltd., aggrieved by the order of the Commissioner of Customs - first respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2012

M/s. Sri Ragavendra Ad Lab Rep. by Its Proprietor and Others Vs. the S ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-04-2012

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : 2013(1)CWC87; 2013WLR66

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioners: T.R. Rajagopalan, Senior Counsel for S. Rajendrakumar , Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, R. Thiyagarajan, Senior Counsel for P.T. Ramkumar, R2, P.H. Aravind Pandian Additional Advocate General Assisted by G. Anantharangan, R. Arunmo

(PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 2nd respondent, its officers, subordinates or any one acting under or through him from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2009

Vaigai Traders Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-05-2009

Subject : Sales Tax/Vat

Acts : Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 7A

Reported in : (2010)27VST486(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : A. Thiyagarajan, Sr. Counsel for S. Ramsh Kumar, Adv.

ORDERF.M. Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.1. This tax case revision has been preferred by the assessee, where the following substantial questions of law have been framed:(i) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial