Advanced Search Results

Prayag NaraIn and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16, 39 and 226

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC1755; (1998)3UPLBEC2125

Advocate for Appellant : Amit Saxena and ;P.N. Saxena, Advs.

O.P. Garg, J.1. All the petitioners in these five writ petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, are employed as class IV employee in thePublic Works Department in district Fatehpur. They are working on...

Lcl Jewellery Ltd. and ors. Vs. Bank of Baroda and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CompanyBanking

Acts : Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR2004All138; IV(2004)BC124; [2004]53SCL97(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Brijesh Kumar Saxena, ;K.K. Saxena and ;Jaspreet Singh, Advs.

ORDERA.N. Verma, J.1. Through the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India the petitioners have assailed the order dated 31-3-2003 and 30-9-2003 passed by opposite party No. 4 as contained in...

In Re: Tannery and Footwear Corporation of India Limited

Court : Allahabad

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 20

Reported in : [2003]115CompCas332(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Vinay Khare and ;Somesh Khare, Advs. for TAFCO Officers' Association, ;S.C. Budhwar, Adv. assisted by ;Yashwant Varma, Adv., ;Narendra Mohan, Adv. for TAFCO Janta Mazdoor Union and ;Sandeep Saxena, Ad

A.K. Banerji, J.1. The Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR in short) had vide its order dated February 14, 1995, recommended the winding up of the company Tannery and Footwear Corporation of India Limited ('TAFCO'...

Mohd. Umar S/O Bilal Vs. Ashok S/O Dattatray Nayak and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules and Orders - Sections 1 - Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 14; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 23A, 23E and 23J

Reported in : 2002(3)MPHT218; 2002(2)MPLJ139

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Saxena, Sr. Adv. i./b. ;S.C. Shrivastava, Adv.

ORDERA.K. Gohil, J.1. Applicant-tenant has filed this civil revision under Section 23E of the Accommodation Control Act, against the order dated 18-3-99, passed by the Rent Controlling Authority, Indore, in Eviction Case No. A-9(7) 13/99, allowing...

Janki Bai and ors. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 302, 304B and 498A; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 374(2)

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1211; I(2006)DMC405; 2006(1)MPLJ523

Advocate for Appellant : Madhukar Kulshreshtha and ;Nutan Saxena, Advs.

A.K. Shrivasvata, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 28.8.2002, passed by VIth Additional Sessions Judge, Bhind in Sessions Trial No. 28 of 2001 convicting appellants 1 to 3 under...

S.C. Saxena Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 4E(3); Constitution of India - Article 234

Reported in : (2000)3UPLBEC1900

Advocate for Appellant : Sandeep Saxena, Adv.

O.P. Garg and S. Harkauli, JJ.1. The core question, which has been canvassed in this writ petition is whether the officers of the Indian Administrative Service, Labour and other departments who have never discharged judicial functions...

i.G. Shoes Private Limited Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 13A and 28A

Reported in : [2003]129STC496(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Kunwar Saxena, Adv.

R.B. Misra, J.This trade tax revision has been preferred under Section 11 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 (in short called 'the Act') against the order dated July 26, 2002 passed in Appeal No, 148...

Shri Kishore and anr. Vs. Roop Kishore

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 103; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27 and 27(1)

Reported in : AIR2006All103; 2006(2)AWC1486

Advocate for Appellant : Amit Saxena, Adv.

ORDERVineet Saran, J.1. Petitioners Shri Kishore and Bacchan Babu as well as respondent Roop Kishore are all real brothers having their landed properties situated in the village. After the death of their father, they inherited the...

Veera Nath Vs. Director of Education and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1091; (2004)2UPLBEC1448

Advocate for Appellant : Sandeep Saxena, Adv.

Vineet Saran, J.1. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer for quashing the order dated 5.12.2001 passed by respondent No. 1 as well as the consequential orders dated 29.12.2001 and 5.2.2002 passed by the...

Manminder Singh Vs. Chandra Cold Storage and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 - Rules 245 (H) and (I) and 285 (D), (H), (I) and (J); Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 154; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 11

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC1505

Advocate for Appellant : Y.K. Saxena and ;P.C. Shakya, Advs.

S.R. Singh, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.2.1999 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 5350 of 1999 in Re : Chandra Cold Storage v. State of U. P. and...