Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a s nambiar · Page 1 of about 124 results (0.160 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 16 2006

C.T. Radhakrishnan Vs. C.T. Viswanathan Nair and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-16-2006

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Madras Marumakkathayam Act, 1932 - Sections 38; ;Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975; ;Marumakkathayam Law

Reported in : AIR2006SC910; (SCSuppl)2006(2)CHN40; JT2006(1)SC318; 2006(1)KLT459(SC); 2006(1)SCALE258; (2006)1SCC794

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Nambiar, Sr. Adv.,; Sewa Rama and; P.K. Manohar, Advs

P.K. Balasubramanyan, J.1. The parties to these appeals belong to Chokkura Thaliyadath tarwad, a hindu family governed by Marumakkathayam system of law as modified by the Madras Marumakkathayam Act, 1932. They belong to the thavazhi of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 1994

Government of Union Territory of Pondicherry Vs. Mohammed HussaIn (Dea ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-30-1994

Subject : Civil

Acts : Pondicherry Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling of Land) Act, 1973 - Sections 2(4), 2(10), 2(24), 4(4), 6, 7(1), 9(2) and 21; Constitution of India - Article 39

Reported in : JT1994(7)SC1; 1994(3)SCALE77; (1994)5SCC121; [1994]Supp1SCR282

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Nambiar,; P.K. Manohar and; Shanta Vasudevan, Advs

S.C. Agrawal, J.1. Leave granted in SLP(C) No. 6468/80.2. These appeals raise a common question involving the interpretation of Section 9(2)(a) of the Pondicherry Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 1997

Western India Plywood Limited Vs. P. Ashokan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-19-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923

Reported in : 1997ACJ1281; AIR1997SC3883; JT1997(8)SC154; 1997(2)KLT635(SC); 1997(6)SCALE169; (1997)7SCC638; [1997]Supp4SCR180; 1998(1)LC61(SC); (1997)3UPLBEC1563

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Nambiar,; Shanta Vasudevan and; P.K. Manohar, Advs

ORDERB.N. Kirpal, J.1. The Sole question which arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the respondent, who is an employee of the appellant, can claim damages from the appellant on account of the injury suffered...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 14 1999

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Shiv Kumar Joshi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-14-1999

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1), 7 and 15; Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 5A and 6; Indian Trust Act, 1882 - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR2000SC331; 2000(1)ALLMR(SC)356; [2000]99CompCas347(SC); 2000(1)CTC107; [2000(84)FLR183]; JT1999(10)SC70; (2000)ILLJ552SC; (2000)IIMLJ11(SC); 2000(2)MPHT89; 2000MPLJ328(S

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Nambiar,; Hemant Sharma and; Sushma Suri, Advs

Sethi, J.1. The short but an important question of law to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the provisions of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') can be invoked...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 1993

Hindustan Paper Corpn. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-26-1993

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 6 and 8(2A); Kerala Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 10;Kerala Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 10;

Reported in : JT1993(2)SC458; 1993(1)KLT689(SC); (1993)2MLJ100(SC); 1993(2)SCALE238; 1993Supp(3)SCC350; [1993]2SCR655; [1993]89STC473(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Nambiar,; Shanta Vasudevan,; P.K. Manohar and;

B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.Civil Appeal Nos. 5073-75/85.1. These appeals arise from a common judgment of the Kerala High Court in a batch of three tax revision cases. The question relates to the interpretation of Section 8(2A)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 1996

P.K. Kutty Anuja Raja and Another Vs. State of Kerala and Another Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-01-1996

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3 and 4 to 24

Reported in : 1996IAD(SC)1062; AIR1996SC2212; JT1996(2)SC167; 1996(4)KarLJ509; (1996)1MLJ105(SC); 1996(2)SCALE14; (1996)2SCC496; [1996]1SCR1147; 1996(1)LC753(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Nambiar and; P.K. Manohar, Advs

1. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and decree of the High Court dated January 4, 1977 made in A.S. No. 74 of 1976. The Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 1993

Union Territory of Pondicherry and ors. Vs. P.V. Suresh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-23-1993

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : I(1994)BC8(SC); JT1993(5)SC410; 1993(3)SCALE869; (1994)2SCC70; [1993]Supp2SCR487

Advocate for Appellant : V.T. Gopalan,; A.S. Nambiar and M.N. Krishnamani, Senior Advs.,;

B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. The Union of India represented by the Union Territory of Pondicherry is the appellant in these appeals which are directed against the judgment of a Division Bench of Madras High Court in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2001

Mysore Panels and Boards Ltd., Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Nov-09-2001

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2002)(79)ECC716

1. These are two appeals filed by the above appellants accompanying with the stay applications with reference to the respective impugned Orders passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs (Appeals) Bangalore.2. When the stay...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 2000

State of A.P. Vs. S. Appa Rao and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-21-2000

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : JT2001(2)SC13; (2001)10SCC648

ORDERK.T. Thomas, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the State of Andhra Pradesh under Section 19 of Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (in short 'TADA'). There are thirteen respondents who were arrayed along with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 1971

The Food Inspector, Calicut Corporation Vs. Cherukattil Gopalan and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-06-1971

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7 and 16(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 258(1)

Reported in : AIR1971SC1725; 1971CriLJ1277; (1971)2SCC322; [1971]SuppSCR721

Advocate for Appellant : A. Sreedharan Nambiar, Adv

Vaidialingam, J.1. This appeal, by special leave, by the Food Inspector, Calicut Corporation, is directed against the judgment and order dated June 26, 1968 of the Kerala High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 113 of 1968...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial