Advanced Search Results

Dashrath D. Tembhurnikar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 3 and 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304, 307, 323 and 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164 and 428

Reported in : 2006CriLJ222

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Jaiswal and ;R.B. Gaikwad, Advs.

J.N. Patel, J.1. Heard Mr. A.S. Jaiswal with Mr. R.B. Gaikwad, learned Advocates for appellant/accused and Mr. D.B. Yengal, learned A.P.P. for State.2. In Sessions Trial No. 43/92 the appellant Dashrath s/o. Daji Tembhurnikar was tried...

Prafulla Son of Vinodji Gudadhe Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through t ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Act, 1986 - Sections 2; City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 6, 20(1E), 20(1E)(1), 40A(2), 407 and 407(1); Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 19(1AA); Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Rules, 1987 - Rules 3, 3(4) and 10; Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Regulations

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3593; 2009(6)MhLj695

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Jaiswal and ;A.S. Chandurkar, Advs.

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. The Writ Petition is to be decided finally at admission stage, and accordingly it appears that the same was being fixed at 2-30 p.m., by earlier Benches. It also appears that it was...

Jimmy Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 34, 34(2), 75 and 81

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR729; 2008(4)BomCR648; 2008(3)MhLj141

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Jaiswal, Adv.

C.L. Pangarkar, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the original applicant to the application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which came to be rejected by the District Judge.2. The facts giving...

idbi Ltd. Vs. the Official Liquidator.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company Law

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 529A, 529, 456(2),132, 125, 529(1), 446, 537, 529A(1), 529A(1)(b), 529(1)(c), 446(2), 19(22), 124 ; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19, 19(22), 25, 28,17, 34, 29,30, 18, 34, 38 ;

Advocate for Appellant : Shri S.V. Sohoni; Shri A.S. Jaiswal Advs.

1. A Company, viz. Maharashtra Explosives Ltd. (Company under liquidation), incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 (for short, "the said Act"), having its registered office at Plot No.2, Villa Marina, 924, Nelson Square, Nagpur-13, was ordered...

Taramati Agrawal Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 22, 22(3), 24A, 24B, 26, 26(1) and 26(4); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Madhya Pradesh Minor Mineral Rules, 1961; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 8(2) and 8(3)

Reported in : [2007(1)JCR145(MP)]

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Jaiswal, Sr. Counsel and; Manoj Kushwaha, Adv.

Abhay M. Naik, J.1. This petition relates to refusal of renewal of lease for major minerals for a period of 20 years prayed for by the petitioner, in respect of mining lease granted to her.2. Brief...

M.P. Electricity Board Vs. Anil Narendra

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(28)

Reported in : [2000]102CompCas178(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Jaiswal, Adv.

Dipak Misra, J. 1. In this appeal, preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the appellants have called in question the sustainability of the award passed by...

M/S.Top Ten, a Partnership Firm and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226, 227; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Section 101, 154, 154(2), 91, 137, 94(4), 94(5), 154(2A), 163, 93(2), 152(4), 144D, 94(1) ; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Section 17(3)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.S. Jaiswal, Adv.

1. In both these petitions, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge is to the provisions of Rule 86E of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the...

M/S. Top Ten, a Partnership Firm and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227, 14; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act - Section 101, 154, 154(2), 91, 137, 94(4), 94(5), 93(2), 101(3), 17(3), 91(1)(e), 144D

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.S. Jaiswal, Adv.

1. In both these petitions, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge is to the provisions of Rule 86E of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the...

Dashrath and Others Vs. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: (B. R. Gavai, J) : 1. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent. 2. The petitioners, who are employees in Group D on the establishment of Respondent No.1, have approached this Court praying for...

Suresh Kumar Agrawal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. U.S.Jaiswal

M.C.C.No.1054/2012 21.09.2012 Shri U.S.Jaiswal, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Swapnil Gangully, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of typographical error the designation of the petitioner has...