Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a ramamurthy · Page 1 of about 3,575 results (0.526 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 10 1982

National Textile Workers' Union and Ors. Vs. P.R. Ramakrishnan and Ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-10-1982

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 439, 443, 445(3) and 450; Constitution of India - Article 43A; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 34; Administrative Law; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 25FFF

Reported in : AIR1983SC75; [1983]53CompCas184(SC); (1983)1CompLJ1(SC); (1983)ILLJ45SC; (1983)IIMLJ1(SC); 1982(2)SCALE1144; (1983)1SCC228; [1983]1SCR922

Advocate for Appellant : M.K. Ramamurthi,; Somyaji,; Ambrish Kumar,;

P.N. Bhagwati, J.1. There three appeals by special leave raise a short but interesting question of law relating to the right of workmen employed in a company to appear and oppose a petition for winding up...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 1962

Thota Appanna Died After Disposal of the Appeal and His Lrs. and Sons ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-28-1962

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1963AP418

Advocate for Appellant : S. Ramamurthy, Adv.

Chandrasekhara Sastry, J. 1. This Second Appeal is referred to a Bench by our learned brother, Manohar Pershad, J., as an important question of law is involved in it, the question being whether it is competent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 1991

Anil Kumar Soni Vs. the Managing Director, Punjab Financial Corporatio ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-25-1991

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Financial Corporation (Staff) Regulations, 1961 - Regn. 19(2)

Reported in : AIR1991SC1840; 1(1992)BC128(SC); JT1991(3)SC315; 1991LabIC2137; (1992)ILLJ281SC; 1991(2)SCALE219; (1991)3SCC624; [1991]3SCR184

Advocate for Appellant : M.K. Ramamurthi and; S.S. Rana, Advs

ORDERN.M. Kasliwal, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the decision of the Punjab & Haryana High Court dated 9.5.1985. The appellant Anil Kumar Soni was appointed as Assistant Technical Officer in the Punjab...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 03 1993

P. Murugesan and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-03-1993

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 136 and 309; Madras Corporation Engineering Service Rules, 1969; Madras City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919 - Sections 87

Reported in : JT1993(2)SC115; (1993)ILLJ944SC; (1993)2MLJ5(SC); 1993(1)SCALE423; (1993)2SCC340; [1993]1SCR405

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K. Ramamurthy

1. Heard the counsel for the parties. Leave granted.2. The dispute is between the degree holders and the diploma holders in the engineering service under the Madras Municipal Corporation.3. The Corporation of Madras is governed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 2004

Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. Vs. Federal Motors Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-10-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1), 38, 38(3); Constitution of India - Article 224; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 5, 5(1) and 5(3); Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Madhya Prdesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961

Reported in : 2005(3)BomCR274; 2005(1)CTC53; 115(2004)DLT531(SC); JT2004(10)SC410; (2005)2MLJ1(SC); (2005)141PLR643; 2004(10)SCALE345; (2005)1SCC705

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ramamurthy, Sr. Adv.,; L.K. Garg,; Sriram J. Thalapathy

R.C. Lahoti, C.J.1. Leave granted.2. The suit premises are non-residential commercial premises admeasuring approximately 1000 sq. ft. and situated in Connaught Circus, New Delhi. The premises are owned by the appellant and held on tenancy by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 2004

Cholan Roadways Limited Vs. G. Thirugnanasambandam

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-17-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 11 and 33(2); Evidence Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 19; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173Q

Reported in : I(2005)ACC143; AIR2005SC570; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)439; [2005(104)FLR440]; [2005(2)JCR196(SC)]; JT2005(1)SC116; (2005)ILLJ569SC; (2005)3SCC241; (2005)1UPLBEC817

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ramamurthy, Sr. Adv.,; A. Krishnamoorthy and; Sriram J. T

S.B. Sinha, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 6.6.2001 passed by a Division Bench of the Madras High Court in W.A. No.46/1993 as also the judgment and order passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 1994

Rambahu Vyankuji Kheragade Vs. Maharashtra Road Transport Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-1994

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : (1996)IILLJ733SC; 1995Supp(4)SCC157

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. Chandan Ramamurthi

ORDERKuldip Singh, J.1. The appellant was working as a conductor with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Nagpur (the Corporation). A departmental enquiry was held against him on the allegations that he misappropriated a sum of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2008

Rajendran and ors. Vs. Shankar Sundaram and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-30-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 2, 18, 19, 22 and 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 38, Rule 5; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2008SC1170; 2008(2)ALLMR(SC)797; 2008(3)ALT17(SC); (SCSuppl)2008(3)CHN212; [2008(2)JCR152(SC)]; JT2008(1)SC666; 2008MhLJ547; (2008)151PLR637; RLW2008(2)SC1502; 2008(2)SC1170; 2008AIRSCW1116; 2008(2)CivilLJ876; 2008(3)LH(SC)1777; 2008(2)ICC1; (2008) 2 SCC 724

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ramamurthy, Sr. Adv.,; Kawaljit Kochar,; Rishi Dewan a

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.Appellants herein were defendant Nos. 4 to 7 in the suit. Plaintiff-respondent No. 1 filed the suit against them and four others. They are admittedly partners of defendant No. 1 firm, M/s....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2025

Shri V M Krishnamurthy vs Mr Mathew Koshy

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-18-2025

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 18THDAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.504 OF 2014 (CPC) C/W MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.506 OF 2014 IN...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2017

Chandan Ramamurthi vs.the State & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-23-2017

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajiv Dutta, Mr. P.V. Raghunandan, Mr. Kumar Dushyant Singh, Ms. Sweety Singh, Mr. Sachin Chopra, Mr. Shubhnit Hans, Ms. Aastha Dhawan, Mr. Kamal Bansal

$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) 83/2017 and C.M. Nos.10904/2017& 17404/2017 CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI ..... Appellant Through:Mr. Rajiv Dutta, Senior Advocate with Mr. P.V. Raghunandan and Mr. Kumar Dushyant Singh,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial