Advanced Search Results
Hany Gupta Vs. Madras Port Trust and anr.
Chennai
Jul-17-1985
Labour and Industrial
Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 21 and 28
(1987)ILLJ482Mad
Mr. A. R. Ramanathan
Chandurkar, C.J.1. The two appellants in these two appeals had filed two separate writ petitions challenging the order of the promotion made by the Chairman on 22nd December 1979 promoting eight persons out of whom six...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarry Gupta and anr. Vs. the Madras Port Trust Represented by Its Chai ...
Chennai
Jul-17-1985
Service
(1986)1MLJ73
Mr. A.R. Ramanathan
N.M. Chandurkar, C.J.1. The two appellants in these two appeals had filed two separate writ petitions challenging the order of the promotion made by the Chairman on 22.12.1979 promoting eight persons out of whom six persons...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSundaram Fasteners Limited and ors. Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of ...
Chennai
Aug-01-1988
Property
(1989)1MLJ72
Mr. A.R. Ramanathan, Mr. Ramanathan
ORDERSwamikkannu, J.1. In all these writ petitions, the main point raised on behalf of the petitioners is that when once the power of resumption of the lands assigned to the petitioners is vested with the respondent-Government,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Parvathy Ammal and ors.
Chennai
Oct-15-1987
InsuranceMotor Vehicles
2(1988)ACC494
Mr. A.R. Raman, Mr. A.R. Ramanathan
Swamikkannu, J.1. The appeal is preferred by the New India Assurance Company Limited (the Second respondent before the Tribunal) against the Award of the Tribunal dated 26-4-1982, passed in M.C.O.P. No. 108 of 1978, on a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLucas Tvs, Madras Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs, Madras and ors.
Chennai
Dec-18-1985
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(16), 2(18), 2(23), 2(27), 12, 50, 51 and 75
1987(13)ECC292; 1987(12)LC1213(Madras); 1987(28)ELT266(Mad)
A.R. Ramanathan, Adv.
M.N. Chandurkar, C.J.1. The substantial question which arises for consideration in this appeal relates to the determination of the stage at which goods can be treated as having been exported out of India for the purpose...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Insurance Co. Ltd. Madras Vs. A. Babu and Others
Chennai
Jan-09-1990
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 3, 96(2) and 110A; Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Rules - Rule 39; Road Traffic Act, 1960
II(1990)ACC313; 1990ACJ1003; AIR1990Mad305
A.R. Ramanathan, Adv.
ORDERK. M. Natarajan, J.1. The second respondent Insurance Company, in O.P.No. 175 of 1980 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. Madras is theappellant herein. The facts which are necessary for the disposal of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.R. Rajamanickam Chettiar and ors. Vs. the Union of India
Chennai
Sep-12-1973
Commercial
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73, 151, 152 and 161; Indian Railways Act, 1961 - Sections 73 and 74
AIR1974Mad375
Mr. A. R. Ramanathan
Ismail, J.1. The plaintiffs in O. S. No.79 of 1965 on the file of the court of the Subordinate Judge. Thanjavur are the appellants herein. The main facts are not in controversy. The appellants are merchants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManagement of Tvs Suzuki Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Feb-21-1992
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 10(1), 18 and 19; Constitution of India - Article 226
[1992(65)FLR971]; (1993)ILLJ855Mad; (1992)IIMLJ432
A.R. Ramanathan, Adv.
K.S. Bakthavatsalam, J.1. The short question that has to be considered in this case is whether a reference under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act by the Government is valid, when the charter of demands...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKattabomman Transport Corporation Ltd. Vs. C. Kamachi Ammal and ors.
Chennai
Jun-17-1986
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 34
AIR1987Mad84
A.R. Ramanathan, Adv.
1. This appeal is filed by the second defendant, namely, Kattabomman Transport Corporation Limited, Nagercoil represented by its present Managing Director, M. Jayaraj having his office at Nesamani Nagar, Rani Thottam, Nagercoil, against the judgment and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLucas T.V.S. Ltd., Madras Vs. Government of India, New Delhi
Chennai
Nov-29-1983
Excise
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 131
1984(17)ELT93(Mad)
A.R. Ramanathan, Adv.
ORDER1. The appellant is a public limited company carrying on business in manufacturing electrical equipments for automobile industry. In the course of the business, it imported aluminium rods which were held by the Customs authorities to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »