Advanced Search Results

Attar Singh Vs. Executive Officer, Municipal Board and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Fundamental Rules - Rules 56

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2497

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Jee Saxena and ;A.R. Dubey, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner's service was dispensed with in exercise of Rule 56 of Financial Hand Book, Vol. II, Part II by an order dated 20th July, 1990 containing in Annexure-1 to the writ petition....

Lal Chand Vs. Executive Officer, Municipal Board and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Retrenchment and Retirement of Servants of Municipal Boards Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 3 and 3(2); Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1960 - Sections 297(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2495

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Jee Saxena and ;A.R. Dubey, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner was asked to retire by a notice dated 23rdNovember, 1990 with 3 months pay in lieu of notice. The said order is Annexure-1, since being challenged in this writ petition. Mr....

Kishan Singh Vs. Executive Officer, Municipal Board and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Fundamental Rules - Rule 56; Retrenchment and Retirement of Servants of Municipal Boards Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 3 and 3(2)

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2522

Advocate for Appellant : Ramji Saxena and ;A.R. Dubey, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. By a notice dated July 12, 1990, the petitioner was sought to be retired prematurely under Rule 56, Volume II, Part II to IV of the Financial Hand Book. The said order is...

Smt. Vidya Gupta and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1997 - Sections 6(1A) and 12; Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Rules, 1998 - Rule 22; Constitution of India; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 66

Reported in : AIR2003All1; MANU/UP/0914/2002

Advocate for Appellant : C.P. Ghildyal, ;H.P. Dubey, ;A.R. Dubey, ;A.D. Saunder and ;B.B. Singh, Advs.

S.K. Sen, C.J.1. In the writ petition No. 1025 of 2001 (Tax) and in all the connected writ petitions, common questions of facts and law are involved and, therefore, they are being disposed of by this...

Surendra Rao Vs. Regional Trasport Authority, Gorakhpur Region, Gorakh ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 226; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 71 (2), 72 and 90; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 47 (3) and 64A

Reported in : AIR1992All211

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. C.P. Ghildyal, ;L.P. Naithani, ;A.D. Saunders and ;A.R. Dubey, Advs.

ORDERR.A. Sharma, J.1. Petitioners who are the existing operators holding stage carriage permits, have by means of these writ petitions challenged the orders, passed by the Regional Transport Authorities (hereinafter referred to as the RTA) granting...

Sheopal Srivastava and Others Vs. District Magistrate, Varanasi and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesBanking

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 - Sections 25, 34, 71, 92, 95, 95A and 97; Uttar Pradesh Public Money (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 - Sections 2 and 3; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Rules, 1965 - Rule 2; Banking Regulations Act, 1949 - Sections 22(1), 23 and 56

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC2790; (2000)3UPLBEC2087

Advocate for Appellant : C.K. Parekh, ;M.P. Gupta, ;Salil Kumar Rai, ;Ramakrishna, ;A.R. Dubey, ;G.K. Singh, ;S.S. Tripathi, Saghir Ahmad, ;Jai Prakash Singh, ;P.K. Ganguly and ;Bajrang Bahadur Singh, Advs.

Palok Basu, J. 1. Nagariya Sahkari Bank Ltd., Varanasi (hereinafter referred to as the Bank) is a Primary Urban Co-operative Bank within the meaning of Section 2 of the U. P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 (for...

Dhirajilal Vishanji Chedda and Others Vs. Kshitija Infrastructure Pvt. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Gorwadkar

Oral Judgment:- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. 2. Since parties and issues involved are similar, these Civil Revision Applications are being disposed of by common judgment. The representative facts are taken from...

Damji Ramji Shah Vs. Angela Joseph Montero and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Order: 1. By this Appeal, the original defendant no.4 has challenged the Judgment and order dated 1.8.2014 passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court, Mumbai, in Draft Notice of Motion in L.C.Suit No.2160 of...

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Reported in : JT2008(7)SC210; (2008)5MLJ604(SC); 2008(6)SCALE499; (2008)7SCC126; 2008(7)SCC133; 2008AIRSCW3877

Advocate for Appellant : G.R. Vahanvati, S.G., ;A. Sharan, ASG, ;Harish N. Salve, ;Uday U Lalit, ;T.S. Doabia, ;Ranjit Kumar, ;K.K. Venugopal, ;Mukul Rohtagi, ;P.S. Patwalia, ;Altaf Ahmed, ;V.A. Mohta, ;S.B. Upadhyay, ;Ranjit

ORDER1. It is an undisputed fact that the forest in this country is an important and vital component to sustain the life support system on this planet. For various reasons, our forest is being slowly depleted....

State of Bihar and Ors. Etc. Vs. Anil Kumar and Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4397-4400 OF2017(Arising from SLP(C) Nos. 27524-27 of 2011) State of Bihar and others etc. ..Appellants versus Anil Kumar and others etc. ..Respondents With...