Advanced Search Results

Food and Commercial Workers Vs. Brown Group, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Food and Commercial Workers v. Brown Group, Inc. - 517 U.S. 544 (1996) OCTOBER TERM, 1995 Syllabus UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 751 v. BROWN GROUP, INC., DBA BROWN SHOE CO. CERTIORARI TO THE...

Pennell Vs. City of San Jose

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Pennell v. City of San Jose - 485 U.S. 1 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court Pennell v. City of San Jose, 485 U.S. 1 (1988) Pennell v. City of San Jose No. 86-753 Argued November 10, 1987...

The Official Assignee of Madras Vs. T. Krishnaji Bhat

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1933)35BOMLR756

George Lowndes, J.1. On October 5, 1919, one T. Sivasankar Bhat, the father of the respondent, instructed his uncle Sadasiva Tawkar by letter to invest in his firm T.R. Tawker & Sons a sum of Rs....

Shivramdas Vs. B.V. Nerurkar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies Other Taxes

Reported in : (1937)39BOMLR633

B.J. Wadia, J.1. This is a chamber summons taken out by the applicants, who are a firm of solicitors of this Court against the respondents who were the defendants in the suit in the matter of...

In Re: Sabnis, Goregaonkar and Senjit and Vs. B.V. Nerurkar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Municipal Tax

Reported in : AIR1937Bom374

B.J. Wadia, J.1. This is a Chamber Summons taken out by the applicants who are a firm of solicitors of this Court against the respondents who were the defendants in the suit in the matter of...

Shree Precoated Steels Limited Vs. Macsteel International Far East Ltd ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Acts, 1963; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 10 and 151 - Order 7, Rule 11; London Court of International Arbitration Rules

Reported in : 2008(2)BomCR681

Advocate for Appellant : Janak Dwarkadas, Sr. Adv. and; Sandip Parikh,; Amit Pradhan, Adv., i/b.,; Wadia Gandhy, Adv. and Co.

Vazifdar S.J., J.1. It would be convenient to deal with both the notices of motion by a common order as the facts involved therein are the same.2. Defendant No. 1 is a company based in Hongkong...

The Official Assignee of Madras Vs. the Devakottah Nagarathar Sri Meen ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : 121Ind.Cas.603; (1929)57MLJ99

Anantakrishna Aiyar, J.1. M.A.R.N. Ramanathan Chettiar, a Nattukottai Chetty, who was carrying on money-lending transaction under the firm's name of M.A.R.N. Ramanathan Chettiar, was a member of the Committee of the Naga-rathar Sri Meenakshi Vidyasala Paripalana...

Karapaya Servai and Others Vs. Mayandi

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : A. Pennell, for Appellants; V. Avertoon, for Respondent. Solicitors for Appellant, J.E. Lambert; Solicitors for Respondent, Bramall and Bramall.

Sir George Lowndes: The question for determination in this appeal is as to the respondent's right to share in the estate of one Karapaya Servai, a Madrassi Hindu, who seems to have acquired a considerable fortune...

Rowland Ady and Others Vs. Administrator General of Burma, Administrat ...

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Dunne and A Pennell, for Appellants; R.F. Roxburgh and Malore, for Respondent. Solicitors for Appellants, J. E. Lambert. Solicitors for Respondent, Burton, Yeates and Hart.

Lord Wright: The question in this appeal relates to a promissory note executed by the appellants dated 12th September 1933. This note was a renewal of an earlier promissory note executed in 1930, but as it...

Lala Ram Sarup Vs. Court of Wards Through Deputy Commissioner, Delhi a ...

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Contract

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Eddy and A.P. Pennell, for Appellant, W. Wallach, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellant, Lambert and White, Solicitors for Respondents, Solicitor, India Office

SIR GEORGE RANKIN: The appellant Lala Ram Sarup and respondent 4, Lala Alopi Parshad (herein called the plaintiffs), brought the suit out of which this appeal arises in the Court of the District Judge at Delhi...