Advanced Search Results
Sri Ranganathar Mills Vs. State of Madras
Chennai
Jan-12-1970
Sales Tax
[1971]27STC216(Mad)
Padmanabhan, Adv.
Ramaprasada Rao, J. 1. The assessee started business in groundnut and groundnut kernel in the assessment year 1962-63. For the first assessment year, he returned a turnover of Rs. 78,232.23. There were two surprise inspections made...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Ranganathar Mills Vs. State of Madras, Represented by the Deputy C ...
Chennai
Jan-12-1970
Direct Taxation
(1971)1MLJ268
Mr. Padmanabhan
T. Ramaprasada Rao, J.Tax Case No. 402 of 19691. The assessee started business in groundnut and groundnut kernel in the assessment year 1962-63. For the first assessment year, he returned a turnover of Rs. 78,232.23. There...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMercantile Credit Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai
Apr-23-1998
Direct Taxation
[2000]108TAXMAN210(Mad)
K. Vaitheeswaran, Subburaya Aiyar, Padmanabhan and Ramani, for the Assessee R. Sivaraman and C.V. Rajan, for the Revenue
Janardhanam, J.Four questions of law had been referred to this court for its opinion. The questions are :'1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sankaranarayanan Potti (Dead) by L.R.S. Vs. K. Sreedevi and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-26-1998
TenancyProperty
Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963; Kerala Land Reforms (Amended) Act, 1969 - Sections 2(22 and 57), 72B and K, 108(3) and 125(3)
AIR1998SC1808; JT1998(2)SC637; 1998(2)SCALE476; (1998)3SCC751; [1998]2SCR444
T.R.G. Warriyar and A.S. Nambiar, Senior Advs.,; P.K. Manohar and;
S.B. Majmudar, J.1. Leave granted.2. LA. No. 4, Application for substitution of the heirs of deceased original petitioner, is granted. We have heard learned senior counsel for the appellants, heirs of the original petitioner in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMonna Ahamad (Died) and ors. Vs. Khadeeja Beevi and ors.
Chennai
Oct-11-1968
Property
(1970)1MLJ285
ORDERK.S. Venkataraman, J.1. This is an appeal of a judgment-debtor against the order of the learned Subordinate Judge of Padmanabhapuram in Kanyakumari District overruling his objection to the execution and allowing execution to proceed. The decree...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJindal Drugs Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Mumbai
Apr-27-2007
Excise
Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 68; Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Rule 18
2009[16]STR114
R.A. Dada, Sr. Adv. and ;Prakash Shah, Adv., i/b., ;P.D.S. Legal, Adv.
S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. By this Petition, the Petitioner is challenging the Order-in-Original dated 3rd April, 2007 passed by Respondent No. 3 rejecting the rebate claims filed by the Petitioner and adjudicating the same.2. The brief facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR. Rajamanickam, for Himself and on Behalf of ors. Award Staff Vs. Ind ...
Chennai
Oct-01-1981
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2, 2-A, 4-A and 10; Constitution of India - Article 226; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 2; West Bengal Shops and Establishments Act, 1963; Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 - Sections 6
(1981)IILLJ367Mad
1. The prayer in the writ petition is for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, quashing the circular No. 2/8 dated 3-1-1978 issued by the Personnel Department of the respondent-Bank and directing them to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Vijaya Kumar and ors. Vs. Y.M.C.A. of Greater Hyderabad, Rep. by It ...
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-04-1997
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 114 - Order 47, Rule 1
1997(6)ALT401
N.V. Suryanarayana Murthy and ;N.C. Das, Advs.
ORDERR.M. Bapat, J.1. The review petitioners herein were the appellants in CM. A.No. 730 of 1997 on the file of this Court. The review petition is filed by the review petitioners herein for reviewing the Order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Manoharan, Etc. versus the Administrative Officer and Another
Supreme Court of India
Feb-11-2026
[2026] 2 S.C.R. 596
Ms. Haripriya Padmanabhan
[2026] 2 S.C.R. 596 : 2026 INSC 143 N. Manoharan, Etc. v. The Administrative Officer and Another (Civil Appeal No(s). 1513-1522 of 2026) 11 February 2026 [Pankaj Mithal and S.V.N. Bhatti,* JJ.]Issue for ConsiderationWhether the employees...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohammed Ismail and anr. Vs. Khadirsa Rowther and ors.
Chennai
Feb-24-1982
Trusts and Societies
Trust Act, 1882 - Sections 90 ; Muslim Law; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 65
AIR1983Mad123
E. Padmanabhan, ;Kannalan and ;P. Ramachandran, Advs.
Mohan, J. 1. The following genealogical tree sets out the relationship of the parties:-(See genealogical table below) Defendants 7 to 22 third party purchasers or their legal representatives from defendants 1 and 2.Khadirsa Rowther, the first...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »